[metmom]

When demonstrably false positions are represented as the doctrines and dogmas of the Church and are substantiated by nothing more than unverifiable anecdotes, repeated urban legends, excerpts from forbidden websites, attempts to represent the actions of a single or small group of individuals as representative of the billion plus Catholics and the writings so-called Protestant experts on Catholicism

Interesting in that almost all of what I post from is from here.......

http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/_INDEX.HTM

Others quote the "church fathers" Catholics love to lean on in support of Catholic doctrine.

[presently no screen name]

I’m in the middle of a few things - am I reading/understanding Daniel’s post correctly - does that apply to him, like he received that message from a mod?

[Natural Law]

"Interesting in that almost all of what I post from is from here......."

I invite you to provide your definition of "almost all" for me. I have gone back through your entire posting history since the first of the year. I have seen hundreds of posts that about the Catholic Church (RCs, RCC, "they, etc.) While I have seen hundreds of posts that I find to be dismissive, disdainful, rude, insulting, and completely fallacious about Catholics, the Church and its doctrines, the one thing I did not see was any citation of the Catechism or references to it. I remind you that communications always work better when they are limited to the truth and the subject matter begs it.

Peace be with you.

[CynicalBear]

How often have we seen that happen? Information from Catholic sites is accused of being from an anti Catholic site. I’m almost embarrassed for them at times.