You wrote:
“Would you believe a Jesuit source, Fordham University? Or are they themselves indulging [no pun intended] in a “juicy anti-Catholic fantasy”?”
The quote you posted IS NOT THE QUOTE THAT WAS POSTED EARLIER and it CLEARLY SAYS SOMETHING DIFFERENT. I can understand that Protestant anti-Catholics commonly are ignorant about history, but that doesn’t mean they should falsely and dishonestly claim that two DIFFERENT QUOTES are the same when they obviously are not!!!
What was posted earlier in the thread IS A LIE. The Council of Trent NEVER SAID IT. The quote you posted does not say the same thing. That won’t stop Protestant anti-Catholics from lying about it anyway, of course.
Oh, relax. If what I brought didn't include the quote you were referencing, then WHAT QUOTE are you talking about?
As far as I could tell, the "Trent" reference/quote made by Persevero included;
That was made in #38, which you later seemed to attribute to #31, which would be an impossibility, since #31 was a post made by...wait for it....yourself.
Now the above [in teal color] is found within what I posted to you. If there be some OTHER quote attributed to the Council of Trent, brought here by Persevero, then I'll confess to having missed it. Could you point it out to me?
I have searched this thread, and saw no other thing from Persevero presented as a quote from "Trent". You called it a lie. I PROVED OTHERWISE. Should I re-post and highlight that one sentence from the larger context portion, so that you may see it?
I'm not lying at all. I do wish you would stop with the ceaseless accusations.
What EXACTLY was the Persevero statement which he himself attributed to "Trent"?With yourself having referenced post #31, I went there looking for a Trent reference, found it was one of your own comments, went looking at adjacent posts, found #38.
This may take some time on your own part, but at least I gave you the post #'s to begin your own search with.
otherwise, re-tracing the conversation you had with Persevero, leads nowhere else but to his quote in #38.
Don't you remember it? You replied to it with a lengthy post quite difficult to read due to lack of paragraphs. In that post you apparently quoted a priest but failed to give a source reference or link.