Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/27/2013 5:14:21 PM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: markomalley

Good article.


2 posted on 06/27/2013 5:19:05 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

I think it is time that the good Cardinal put up or shut up and start excommunicating the many phony Catholics that infest the beltway.


3 posted on 06/27/2013 5:22:49 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

+1


4 posted on 06/27/2013 5:24:01 PM PDT by WriteOn (Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
Are we coming to a point where we should consider dropping our use of the word “marriage?”

I don't know, but I do know the word "fiance" seems about beyond redemption.

5 posted on 06/27/2013 5:26:55 PM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Yes, we should talk about holy matrimony, or unity covenants, or some other term which means a man and a woman coming together in such a union.

Since the meaning of marriage has now been changed, this seems like a good idea.

Ya, the homosexual community changed the definition of gay. Nobody uses the dictionary definition of gay anymore. Nowadays, gay means only homosexual. It just can’t be used to mean anything else anymore.

In the case of marriage, liberals will tell us it’s bigoted if we assume a married woman is married to a man. So perhaps it is time to use a term which by definition will be an opposite sex union, not a same sex union.


6 posted on 06/27/2013 5:27:23 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Better to have no state involvement in the area of marriage.


7 posted on 06/27/2013 5:37:25 PM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

I like the thought process here....


8 posted on 06/27/2013 5:37:34 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Let it go, please let it go! The internet, the TV and the talk radio shows are all full of this DOMA crap. I’m tired of watching this squirrel. We have much more important political issues to pay attention to. The homosexuals can go marry chickens for all I care.


9 posted on 06/27/2013 5:37:45 PM PDT by jespasinthru (Proud member of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
People who get married in the church should abandon the practice of making marriages legal by registering with the government.

If you have a church ceremony, you are morally married.

Dispense with the piece of paper, and the feral government has no further say.

10 posted on 06/27/2013 5:37:54 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Who could have guessed that one day pro wrestling would be less fake than network news?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

IMO, good idea. Think I’ll start using that phraseology. Give them “marriage.” Let’s see how blasphemous the Left can become. After ringing the National Cathedral bells yesterday I’m curious...


11 posted on 06/27/2013 5:41:12 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

The Church should - stop filling in and submitting documents to the state and then change the requirements for a person to receive Holy Matrimony in a Church.

People can then go and to a registry office to have the marriage sanctioned/recognized by the state if that is what they want.

They do this in places like Singapore. First they will do the legal wedding and then the Church service later.

Firstly though the Pope needs to make it clear to all clergy that anyone performing a service or “wedding” for homos will be forcibly excommunicated i.e. kicked out of the church - their living accommodation the full works. Not this “has “automatically excommunicated themselves but nothing is ever done rubbish”.

Mel


13 posted on 06/27/2013 5:42:36 PM PDT by melsec (Once a Jolly Swagman camped by a Billabong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

I think giving up a perfectly good word because judges, pols, or the voting public have such a hard time defining it is foolish. I mean we didn’t change the word because of civil divorce and remarriage. I don’t think we should let the people that have the problem make us change. No one suggests that we quit using the word priest because some wackadoos think they can be ‘women priests.’

If you want a concrete way to demonstrate the difference between what the Church knows marriage to be and the state, stopping acting as the state’s representatives for the civil side might be the way to go. Explain why the change is being made, show everyone that yes, it is a big deal. It’s not like the Church looks at the civil recognition as the determining factor to decide if someone is married or not anyhow if you consider civil divorce and remarriage.

Freegards


14 posted on 06/27/2013 5:44:15 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
yes... the word marriage has been defiled
16 posted on 06/27/2013 5:45:20 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
I would just set aside the notion of marriage.

Did it twice, can't recommend it.

19 posted on 06/27/2013 6:04:48 PM PDT by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
B T T T ! ! ! ©

20 posted on 06/27/2013 6:13:50 PM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

What about calling it hetero-marriage (vs homo-marriage)? As in, My hetero-marriage is a Sacrament of Holy Matrimony.


23 posted on 06/27/2013 6:26:06 PM PDT by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs stay silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

I second that but, the words husband and wife are also being redefined.

Joe + Joe = husband and husband


25 posted on 06/27/2013 6:38:54 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

What baffles me is the argument. 87 congress members and a president are racist because sodomizers have rights ?

The Chief Justice can set the rule of the the arguments of merit to the case before the court. It’s done every day it’s known as “the judge won’t allow”. Because the administration now favors “gay marriage” I wouldn’t expect what could be called a healthy defence from them. Sodomy wasn’t the issue . The issue was protecting the integrity and intention of a basic unit of society through a mechanisim known as marriage to encourage familys.

What should we expect from a political party which itself has gone through a marriage with one world socialist radicals known to many as communists who can’t even use the word God. They’ve hyphenated into Demo-Coms.

No just because a radical bunch have taken over and edicts changes in customs and values to conform to their idology should we set back and accept it. Time to stand up and be counted.


30 posted on 06/27/2013 9:02:50 PM PDT by mosesdapoet (Serious contribution pause.Please continue onto meaningless venting no one reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

This is a good idea. We Christians need to talk about Christian marriage. And those bakers and florists who are now getting sued for not providing for “gay weddings” need to make clear they only provide services for “Holy Matrimonies.”


31 posted on 06/27/2013 9:30:35 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom; thefrankbaum; Tax-chick; GregB; saradippity; Berlin_Freeper; Litany; SumProVita; ...

Catholic ping!


33 posted on 06/28/2013 3:06:38 PM PDT by NYer ( "Run from places of sin as from the plague."--St John Climacus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson