Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor
You are mistaken as far as the Bible goes. The references to brothers and sisters are there because there was no word for cousins. Please study a little more.

Mary was a perpetual virgin. Even these men say so!

Essays for Lent: Mary Ever-Virgin
Why is the perpetual virginity of Mary so important to Catholics? [Ecumenical Vanity]
Is the Perpetual Virginity of Mary a Biblical View?
Aeiparthenos (An Anglo-Catholic Priest on Mary's Perpetual Virginity)
The Heõs Hou polemic is over: Radio Debate Matatics VS White & Svendsen on Perpetual Virginity Mary
The Early Church Fathers on Mary’s Perpetual Virginity - Catholic/Orthodox Caucus
The Heõs Hou polemic is over: Radio Debate Matatics VS White & Svendsen on Perpetual Virginity Mary
Luther, Calvin, and Other Early Protestants on the Perpetual Virginity of Mary
Luther, Calvin, and Other Early Protestants on the Perpetual Virginity of Mary

42 posted on 07/22/2013 4:41:55 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Salvation
Mary was a perpetual virgin. Even these men say so!

Why do you guys always go for the wisdom of men instead of the Wisdom of God???

You are mistaken as far as the Bible goes. The references to brothers and sisters are there because there was no word for cousins. Please study a little more.

And get as biblically smart as you are??? No thanks...

Luke 1:36 And behold thy cousin Elizabeth, she also hath conceived a son in her old age; and this is the sixth month with her that is called barren:

The bible ofcourse says you are wrong, again...

52 posted on 07/22/2013 5:19:46 PM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation
The references to brothers and sisters are there because there was no word for cousins.

Your theology forces you to conclude they MUST have been cousins. ... You do not get this from the text at all.

It is your man-made traditions that inspire you to make this claim, there is nothing in the text that even remotely hints that "cousins" is meant here.

Keep up the gymnastics and you will make the Olympic team.

229 posted on 07/23/2013 12:04:22 PM PDT by dartuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

>> “You are mistaken as far as the Bible goes. The references to brothers and sisters are there because there was no word for cousins” <<

.
That is one of Rome’s ugliest falsehoods.

Who would the parents of these “cousins” be?

They sim,ply do not exist. Mary was a very productive and proper Jewish wife, and bore many children as the Gospels accurately speak.


277 posted on 07/23/2013 8:11:27 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation
Even these men say so!

Then, by GOD!, I believe it!


I believe it - I believe it!

(Obscure Stalag 17 reference.)

491 posted on 07/26/2013 3:19:51 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation
Even these men say so!

Romans 3:4
God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written...

492 posted on 07/26/2013 3:20:52 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson