Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Alex Murphy; Biggirl; Gamecock
We don't know the "how" but we know the "why": because she was to be Kecharitomene.

This I know.

For the Bible tells me so.

40 posted on 07/29/2013 8:36:48 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Behold the Cross of the Lord! Flee, hostile powers! The Lion of the Tribe of Judah has conquered!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

The Bible says Jesus was “like us in every way” yet was without sin. So, the fact that Jesus could sin is indisputable; he wasn’t guilty of Mary’s sin because while Mary certainly passed on her human/sinful nature to Jesus HE NEVER OBEYED IT. He was without sin. Therefore no judgement nor guilt.


51 posted on 07/29/2013 8:45:30 AM PDT by Dansong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Don-o; Alex Murphy; Biggirl; Gamecock
Luke 1:28 does use the word kecharitomene, which literally means "one who has been graced" or “I favor, bestow freely on”.

Acts 6:8 refers to Stephen as plErEs charitos, which literally means "full of grace" and just the same as the description used of Jesus in John 1:14.

So if Catholics insist that Mary was sinless because of the use of kecharitomene they must also believe that Stephen was also sinless since the version of the word charitos along with the word plErEs gives Stephen the same “full of grace” as Jesus but does not give that to Mary.

109 posted on 07/29/2013 3:45:50 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson