[Mrs. Don-o]

I think you've misunderstood what I wrote. I did not state, nor even imply, that "being gay is new." I did not state, nor even imply, that gay sexual arrangements could be "accepted, condoned, or justified."

Where you got that from, I do not know. It's not what I wrote, and it's the opposite of what I believe.

[presently no screen name]

it's the opposite of what I believe.

I have no doubt about that. It's why I said don't get caught up in it. You listed them after cohabitation, abortion, etc. as if the wrongs of man/women can justify their depravity. While you showed how mighty we have fallen as a society, this article, IMO, is mocking the 'traditionalists' into accepting 'homo' marriage is just as valid - with their 'beam in their own eye' comment.

[presently no screen name]

I think you've misunderstood what I wrote.

I think are minds were on different things. Your's was on the progression of wrongs in society and mine was on the intent of this article.