Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: vladimir998
Therefore, Simon was not ALREADY called Peter when those events unfolded.

So you are trying to claim that the writer, after an event (Duh! when else!!), would FAIL to provide the correct information about what took place?

379 posted on 09/04/2013 4:45:48 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies ]


To: Elsie

“So you are trying to claim that the writer, after an event (Duh! when else!!), would FAIL to provide the correct information about what took place?”

Nope. No incorrect information was provided. Simon was called Peter - just not at the time when the events unfolded. Hence, John 1:42. Ever read it?


388 posted on 09/04/2013 8:41:25 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson