“and therefore cannot be telling the truth now when you say you got this from a Brewer PDF”
I confess, you caught me. I copied from the eeevil anti-Catholic website first, and then searched for a PDF for the entire book online to quote from instead. Finding Brewer’s website small PDF, and that they were the same though not the entire book, I did not bother to recopy the material.
So, you got me big time on this one.
You wrote:
“I confess, you caught me. I copied from the eeevil anti-Catholic website first, and then searched for a PDF for the entire book online to quote from instead. Finding Brewer’s website small PDF, and that they were the same though not the entire book, I did not bother to recopy the material.”
So, in other words:
1) you used the banned website,
2) you then used another source and claimed it was the actual source when that was completely untrue,
3) you have now admitted that you posted something that was untrue and that you knew it was untrue when you posted it (i.e. your claim that you got it from the Brewer PDF was a complete fabrication on your part because you actually got it from the banned website - as you have now admitted).
“So, you got me big time on this one.”
Do you wonder - even for a second - why I believe anti-Catholic Protestants are liars? You can pass this off as no big deal, but what you did was wrong. Anti-Catholic Protestants lie. They lie often and they don’t care about being honest in regard to the Catholic Church. I’m glad you admitted that you acted falsely, but I don’t doubt for a second that you’ll just say this is no big deal. Lying is morally wrong.
Fifty lashes with a wet noodle for you mister.....