Posted on 11/03/2013 6:47:04 AM PST by don-o
Just seven years ago, if someone had told me that I'd be writing for Christianity Today magazine about how I came to believe in God, I would have laughed out loud. If there was one thing in which I was completely secure, it was that I would never adhere to any religion—especially to evangelical Christianity, which I held in particular contempt.
I grew up in the Episcopal Church in Alaska, but my belief was superficial and flimsy. It was borrowed from my archaeologist father, who was so brilliant he taught himself to speak and read Russian. When I encountered doubt, I would fall back on the fact that he believed.
Leaning on my father's faith got me through high school. But by college it wasn't enough, especially because as I grew older he began to confide in me his own doubts. What little faith I had couldn't withstand this revelation. From my early 20s on, I would waver between atheism and agnosticism, never coming close to considering that God could be real.
(Excerpt) Read more at christianitytoday.com ...
First, belief in God....
Next comes, belief in the sanctity of life from conception to natural death?
We’ll be waiting, hon.....
Maybe she’s like Bono (U2) slowly but surely..
Kirsten is pro-life, as far as I know.
I believe she is prolife.
If God is truly doing a work in her life and I believe He is (not that it matters what I believe), He will continue to change her and make her into a new creature. As a fellow Christian, I support her 100% even if I think her politics aren’t excatly where they should be at this moment in time.
Really cool, would have never guessed it, but this could be from not paying attention to Fox News for years. Hope she keeps progressing from progressivity.
Here’s something I came across a while ago along the same lines, sci-fi writer John C. Wright’s conversion from atheist libertarian to conservative Catholic.
http://www.scifiwright.com/2011/09/a-question-i-never-tire-of-answering/
Freegards
I’ve always liked her when she was on FOX. She does not have the wild eyed radical fanatical look the other Dem hags have.
**After college I worked as an appointee in the Clinton administration from 1992 to 1998. The White House surrounded me with intellectual people who, if they had any deep faith in God, never expressed it. Later, when I moved to New York, where I worked in Democratic politics, my world became aggressively secular. Everyone I knew was politically left-leaning, and my group of friends was overwhelmingly atheist.**
Are we claiming one from the far left?
If atheists really believe this ("there is no rhyme or reason to the world"), then what's with all the fanatical moral crusading for "social justice?"
Unless you are telling us something new, I believe that she is still a regular on Fox News as one of the Dem. viewpoints. And I further agree that she has been and hope still is one who is not all party line all of the time.
I hope she has truly believed and won't be reclaimed by the world...
..and I hope her Christian friends give her room on that sanctification road to understand what it means to be a child of God.....and give her room to grow, experience, make mistakes and grow some more.
As far as I know she's still pro choice, for instance....but she was truly appalled with the abortionist, Gosnell(sp) who killed babies after 20 weeks and longer.----She didn't fake her revulsion....
..and I have noticed positive changes in her throughout the year.
And quite frankly, it took guts to write this ....and know her friends can read it.
If I had gone public with a life changing decision I had made, this is exactly the kind of support that would help me on my journey.
Well, if she IS pro-life, she needs to really consider her support of the pro-Death Party...I do with the Stupid Party ALL the time....and I’m not on TV.
I also heard she dated Weiner at one time...
That might make anyone do a u-turn....
I was amazed at how kindly her boyfriend handled his efforts to bring her into the fold so he could try to prepare her to marry him. Single young men everywhere, take note!
Perhaps she may be ready to consider the validity of the historical analysis and assertions about America's role in the history of nations delivered by Methodist Bishop and Ohio State Legislator, Rev. Benjamin W. Arnett, and delivered as the "Centennial Thanksgiving Sermon," celebrating the Declaration of Independence, at St. Paul A.M.E. Church in Urbana, Ohio.
The Sermon can be read in its entirety online at the American Memory Section of the LOC, in the African-American Collection. It disputes and explodes "liberals'" claims about America's foundations. His theme: "Righteousness Exalteth a Nation, but Sin is a Reproach to Any People." Below is a small excerpt from that Sermon's conclusion. In it Rev. Arnett warned about a movement among "liberals" to remove the ideas underlying America's founding documents.
"The Danger to our Country."Now that our national glory and grandeur is principally derived from the position the fathers took on the great questions of right and wrong, and the career of this nation has been unparalleled in the history of the past, now there are those who are demanding the tearing down the strength of our national fabric. They may not intend to tear it down, but just as sure as they have their way, just that sure will they undermine our superstructure and cause the greatest calamity of the age. What are the demands of this party of men? Just look at it and examine it for yourselves, and see if you are willing that they shall have their way; or will you still assist in keeping the ship of state in the hands of the same crew and run her by the old gospel chart! But ye men who think there is no danger listen to the demands of the Liberals as they choose to call themselves:
"'Organize! Liberals of America! The hour for action has arrived. The cause of freedom calls upon us to combine our strength, our zeal, our efforts. These are The Demands of Liberalism:"'1. We demand that churches and other ecclesiastical property shall no longer be exempt from just taxation.
"'2. We demand that the employment of chaplains in Congress, in State Legislatures, in the navy and militia, and in prisons, asylums, and all other institutions supported by public money, shall be discontinued.
"'3. We demand that all public appropriations for sectarian educational and charitable institutions shall cease.
"'4. We demand that all religious services now sustained by the government shall be abolished; and especially that the use of the Bible in the public schools, whether ostensibly as a text-book or avowedly as a book of religious worship, shall be prohibited.
"'5. We demand that the appointment, by the President of the United States or by the Governors of the various States, of all religious festivals and fasts shall wholly cease.
"'6. We demand that the judicial oath in the courts and in all other departments of the government shall be abolished, and that simple affirmation under the pains and penalties of perjury shall be established in its stead.
"'7. We demand that all laws directly or indirectly enforcing the observance of Sunday as the Sabbath shall be repealed.
"'8. We demand that all laws looking to the enforcement of “Christian” morality shall be abrogated, and that all laws shall be conformed to the requirements of natural morality, equal rights, and impartial liberty.
"'9. We demand that not only in the Constitution of the United States and of the several States, but also in the practical administration of the same, no privilege or advantage shall be conceded to Christianity or any other special religion; that our entire political system shall be founded and administered on a purely secular basis; and that whatever changes shall prove necessary to this end shall be consistently, unflinchingly, and promptly made.'
"'Let us boldly and with high purpose meet the duty of the hour.'
"Now we must not think that we have nothing to do in this great work, for the men who are at the head of this movement are men of culture and intelligence, and many of them are men of influence. They are led by that thinker and scholar, F. E. Abbott, than whom I know but few men who has a smoother pen, or who is his equal on the battle-field of thought. He says in an address on the duty of his leagues:
"'My answer may be a negative one to all who see nothing positive in the idea of liberty. The conviction I refer to is this: that, regarded as a theological system, Christianity is Superstition, and, regarded as an organized institution, Christianity is Slavery. The purpose I refer to is this: that, whether regarded as theological system, Christianity shall wholly cease to exercise influence in political matters. Although the national Constitution is strictly secular and non-Christian, there are many things in the practical administration of the government which violate its spirit, and constitute a virtual recognition of Christianity as the national religion. These violations are very dangerous; they are on the increase; they more and more give Christianity a practical hold upon the government; they directly tend to strengthen the influence of Christianity over the people, and to fortify it both as a theology and a church; and they are therefore justly viewed with growing indignation by liberals. Not unreasonably are they looked upon as paving the way to a formidable effort to carry the Christian Amendment to the Constitution; and the liberals are beginning to see that they must extinguish the conflagration in its commencement. I believe all this myself, with more intense conviction every day; and therefore I appeal frankly to the people to begin now to lay the foundations of a great National Party of Freedom. It is not a moment too soon. If the liberals are wise, they will see the facts as they are, and act accordingly. Not with hostility, bitterness, defiance, or anger but rather with love to all men and high faith in the beneficence of consistently republican institutions, do I urge them most earnestly to begin the work at once.'
"He acknowledges that this is a religious nation and wants all men to assist him in eliminating the grand old granite principles from the framework of our national union. Will you do it freeman; will we sell the temple reared at the cost of so much precious blood and treasure? These men would have us turn back the hands on the clock of our national progress, and stay the shadow on the dial plate of our christian civilization; they would have us call a retreat to the soldiers in the army of Christ; the banner of the cross they would have us haul down, and reverse the engines of war against sin and crime; the songs of Zion they would turn into discord, and for the harmony and the melody of the sons of God, they would give us general confusion; they would have us chain the forces of virtue and unloose the elements of vice; they would have the nation loose its moorings from the Lord of truth and experience and commit interest, morally, socially; religiously and politically to the unsafe and unreliable human reason; they would discharge God and his crew and run the ship of State by the light of reason, which has always been but a dim taper in the world, and all the foot-prints it has left are marked with the blood of men, women and children. No nation is safe when left alone with reason.
"But we have no notion of giving up the contest without a struggle or a battle. We are aware that there is a great commotion in the world of thought. Religion and science are at arms length contending with all their forces for the mastery. Faith and unbelief are fighting their old battles over again, everything that can be shaken is shaking. The foundations of belief are assaulted by the army of science and men are changing their opinions. New and starting theories are promulgated to the world; old truths are putting on new garbs. Error is dressing in the latest style, wrong is secured by the unholy alliances, changes in men and things, revolution in church and state, Empires are crumbling, Kingdoms tottering; everywhere the change is seen. In the social circle, in the school house, in the pulpit and in the pews. But amid all the changes and revolutions there are some things that are unchangeable, unmovable and enduring. The forces that underline the vital power of Christianity are the same yesterday, to-day, to-morrow and forever more. They are like their God, who is omnipotent, immovable and eternal, and everywhere truth has marched it has left its moccasin tracks." - (End of Excerpt from "Righteousness Exalteth a Nation, but Sin is a Reproach to Any People")
So said Rev. Benjamin Arnett in 1876! Most Americans today would be totally surprised at Arnett's recounting of the history of nations, and his analysis and documentations of America's Christian foundations should be read by all who claim an "open mind" in evaluating the great questions of our time.
"Thus while the country was awakening to the duties of the hour, the grand Centennial year came upon us and found a nation grand in all that makes a nation great. Let all the people sing praises to the Lord."Let us see what it is that makes us so great; wherein lies our strength. What has made us one of the greatest powers of the earth, politically and intellectually? Have we come to the conclusion that it is Righteousness that exalteth a nation? We have met to-day at the request of the President of the United States, Ulysses S. Grant, and also the Governor of our beloved State, Rutherford B. Hayes. For what? Why call us from our homes? Why come to the house of God? Why not go to the hall of mirth and to the places of amusement to-day? No that is not what they want us to do. We are commanded to go to our 'several places of worship, and there offer up thanks to Kind Providence which has brought our nation through the scenes of another year, and blessed the land with peace, plenty and prosperity.' Then as Americans we have reason to rejoice and congratulate ourselves on the greatness of our beloved country; at this the close of the first hundred years of experimental government of the people, by the people, and for the people. To be a citizen of this vast country is something, and to share in its privileges and duties is more than something." - Rev. Benjamin W. Arnett, Centennial (of the Declaration) Thanksgiving Sermon 1876
Here's a link to the index of her columns for the Daily Beast. Scroll through them. She's smacked down Wendy Davis, and her columns during the Gosnell trial were awesome. Poke around for yourself.
This admission of faith, especially to the extent that "Jesus came to her in a dream" is not gonna sit well with her leftie friends..99.9% of whom are non-religious. It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. ( Joan Walsh, are you listening??)
One more thing...I believe she's recently divorced..she no longer has a ring on...maybe she met the right guy after all, finally.
Well said, Ken!
Very interesting article; I’m happy for Kirsten. Praise God.
We should pray that she continues to grow in her walk with Christ, and to see that the Democratic party is purely evil.
Now she has to work to pull herself out of that pagan party. She already feels God's tug.
I'll be praying for her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.