Not exactly. We are to take both the Hebrew and NT scriptures in a literal-grammatic approach. Not one interpreting the other.
I take it you are not a follower of Yeshua HaMashiach so you will disagree.
You chrstians absolutely refuse to even think about this, don't you?
When the "new testament" says that J*sus "fulfilled" this or that prophecy, it is interpreting the Hebrew Bible. You have never even wondered whether it has the authority to do so because you have always just assumed that it did. If the "new testament" is in fact a fraud, then it does not have the authority to declare J*sus as the fulfillment of this or that "messianic prophecy." And if J*sus was a fraud, then he didn't have the authority to declare this or that act a "fulfillment of messianic prophecy."
Jews go by the Torah because they were given the Torah at Sinai. You don't accept the "old testament" because you received it from G-d. You accept it only on the "authority" of the "new testament." You are engaged in a logical fallacy known as "affirmation of the consequent," "proving" your argument by simply assuming it's truth (evolutionists do the same thing, but chrstians are the world champions).
But never mind. You won't even consider a word I've said because you "know" the "new testament" is divinely inspired by the same G-d Who gave the Torah. You have absolutely no reason whatsoever to assume this (you've just decided to do so), but that won't stop you.
I take it you are not a follower of Yeshua HaMashiach so you will disagree.
He's still not the messiah no matter what you call him.