Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yes, Atheism and Conservatism Are Compatible [uh, huh. bye]
NRO ^ | 26 Feb 2014 | Charles C. W. Cooke

Posted on 02/26/2014 3:05:25 PM PST by Notary Sojac

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-258 next last
To: re_nortex

Thanks for the ping!


41 posted on 02/26/2014 4:07:46 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

>> Where do your rights come from?
> Tradition, the social contract, biology, enlightened self
> interest, etc.

Then they are subject to the vicissitudes of the culture at large, and there is no reason for us to complain when they change. For example, why fight for “gun rights” if such things are a completely artificial construct?

>> Why do you wear clothes?
> Fashion, social acceptance, desire to avoid social
> friction, mating strategies, survival, comfort, etc.

I can see I should have qualified this question.
:)
If we are nothing more than mere animals, then why do we wear clothes? None of the animals do. When the weather is warm, what’s the point of being uncomfortable?

>> Why are there seven days in a week?
> A social convention, tradition.

All over the world? Even in “primitive” cultures?

>> How do you know what is good and what is evil?
> There is no such things as good and evil, just biological
> optimums or the opposite, enlightened self-interest, etc.

If there are no such things as good and evil, then why strive for justice? Who determines what kind of self-interest is “enlightened”? If only driven by biological drives, why don’t feral animals have the same moral sensibilities of obligation toward the weak and feeble members of their own species? How does helping the weak and feeble, the sick and elderly, advance our biological advantage? If anything, it compromises it.

> Biological programming towards reproduction and the
> survival of progeny; biological programming towards the
> survival of the group, etc.

I would submit that biology is very unlikely the only force driving sentient beings capable of abstract thought.


42 posted on 02/26/2014 4:08:03 PM PST by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
I don't care what my neighbor does, unless it is something that demands I shoot him or her.

A good many people live that way. They should not be surprised when the country goes to sh*t as they sit and wait for someone to give reason to act, and then only to shoot.

43 posted on 02/26/2014 4:08:20 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: trisham
The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were the general principles of Christianity. I will avow that I then believed, and now believe, that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God.

-- John Adams, second President of the United States and a signer of the Declaration of Independence


44 posted on 02/26/2014 4:09:47 PM PST by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell
Maybe in the past..

It is nice that you know about the Inquisition

45 posted on 02/26/2014 4:09:52 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex
"When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with inherent and inalienable Rights; that among these, are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness; that to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

For the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor."

~Thomas Jefferson


46 posted on 02/26/2014 4:11:00 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex

Curiously, its extremely easy to visualize a theistic socialism. Several have existed and some still do, in the rest of he world. Very easy to justify philosophically. The longest-living “communes” are religious ones.

There isn’t much of it around now, politically speaking in the US, but I think thats just a matter of fashion.


47 posted on 02/26/2014 4:11:38 PM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac
Let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be
maintained without religion. Reason and experience both forbid us to
expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.
- George Washington


Click The Pic To Donate


48 posted on 02/26/2014 4:11:48 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RginTN
Wrong. Communism’s atheists have killed millions for not agreeing with them.

That's because they were communists, not because they were atheists.

49 posted on 02/26/2014 4:12:27 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
The thing is I do not believe their are really atheist. .im not trying to be funny I am serious. .all people have a god .. ie something they follow. Atheist do not believe in a being as god but can have a thing as god
I might say God is Truth. .but an atheist might have Truth as there god..ie the principal they follow..
Same thing with Love
Some will say God is love but an atheist have love as their god

Its the narcissus atheists that have their self as their god that are the biggest problem..most narcissus become atheist because the idea of anything bigger the their self is not acceptable to believe

50 posted on 02/26/2014 4:12:38 PM PST by tophat9000 (Are we headed to a Cracker Slacker War?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

They go hand in hand.


51 posted on 02/26/2014 4:14:10 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Sorry we all leave this flesh journey and return to the Maker whether we believe or not. Might as well accept reality.

The reality is that my father and mother were my "makers", and I hope I don't go back to them.

52 posted on 02/26/2014 4:14:36 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac

Proposed Seal for the United States

On July 4, 1776, Congress appointed Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams "to bring in a device for a seal for the United States of America." Franklin's proposal adapted the biblical story of the parting of the Red Sea . Jefferson first recommended the "Children of Israel in the Wilderness, led by a Cloud by Day, and a Pillar of Fire by night. . . ." He then embraced Franklin's proposal and rewrote it. Jefferson's revision of Franklin's proposal was presented by the committee to Congress on August 20. Although not accepted these drafts reveal the religious temper of the Revolutionary period. Franklin and Jefferson were among the most theologically liberal of the Founders, yet they used biblical imagery for this important task.

Donate

53 posted on 02/26/2014 4:14:49 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

This is very true that most atheists are leftists and I can’t understand why. They rightly reject a belief in god based on a lack of rational justification but they accept the idea that we are our brothers keeper without any rational justification. They embrace welfare statism and egalitarianism when there is no rational justification for them. They reject the belief in God but accept the altruism preached by religion. That is why I don’t belong to any atheist organizations and won’t. I find an equally strange dichotomy with religious conservatives. They are pro capitalism and individual rights and are against welfare statism and egalitarianism but they embrace the altruist morality that they are based on and that their religion promotes and which is incompatible with capitalism IMO.

And yes we conservative atheists are very rare eggs in my experience.


54 posted on 02/26/2014 4:15:33 PM PST by albionin (A gawn fit's aye gettin..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Atheism is a preposterous philosophy presuming the understanding of another person’s deity.


55 posted on 02/26/2014 4:16:17 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
A good many people live that way. They should not be surprised when the country goes to sh*t as they sit and wait for someone to give reason to act, and then only to shoot.

You say that like it is a bad thing.

56 posted on 02/26/2014 4:19:23 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

>> Contrast the atheist with the christian or moslem.
>> The atheist won’t kill you for not agreeing with them.

Are you equating Christ to Allah?

Are you suggesting killing is immoral?


57 posted on 02/26/2014 4:20:59 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: albionin; DJ MacWoW; trisham
They rightly reject a belief in god...

Ahem. So rejecting a belief in God (note the capitalization which you prefer not to use) is right. Four letters:

IBTZ

This thread is getting very revealing.

58 posted on 02/26/2014 4:22:43 PM PST by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
Conservative principles incorporate; the importance of family, limited government, a strong national defense and free enterprise. In that sense, I suppose an argument can be made for the inclusion of an atheist belief system.

However beyond that Charles, the specifics become pretty clear. As an atheist, without a God, why would you even believe or care about being pro life? Of course without God, same sex marriage certainly makes sense.

Prayer in school or public forums, even a cross on public property most likely offends you considering that you mistakenly believe the constitution says freedom from instead of freedom OF religion.

Yes, i clearly understand there are exceptions to all cases. But thinking, Bozell might have gotten this one correct.

59 posted on 02/26/2014 4:33:42 PM PST by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

I do not find virtue in unconditionally allowing vice to go unnoticed and/or unaddressed so, yes, I say it like it is a “bad thing.”


60 posted on 02/26/2014 4:33:57 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-258 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson