Posted on 06/22/2014 1:00:23 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
I figure “one man and one woman” is in the Bible for a very good reason. The good Lord knew that the stress of a multiple partner household would be too difficult to maintain.
Of course, I have fantasized about having “Brother Husbands”, lol. A plumber that landscapes as a hobby, an electrician that mechanics as a hobby and a doctor that loves to cook with a brother who is a veterinarian. They would all maintain highly successful businesses.
It won’t be the same polygamy, as what we see with the Mormons or Muslims. It will be group marriage, like a hippy commune with everyone having sex with each other.
A large percentage of the world has legal polygamy (mainly the Muslim world). A much stronger case can be made for polygamy than for same sex marriage.
“You don’t seriously justify polygamy on the basis of past primitive social systems.”
If you ask me which violates God’s law and natural law, homosexuality or polygamy, I’d say homosexuality.
Now, I also wrote “No, I don’t want polygamy legal either.” However, it is not unnatural for a male mammal to mate with more than one female. And while scripture doesn’t hold polygamy up as the best, neither does it roundly condemn it or say it is perverse.
Sodomy is the worst thing a guy can do.
Reality will have its revenge. First came the gay bathhouse scene of the 1970s, with AIDS following close behind. Now we have all of that coming back with the AIDS drugs, so a new bug is going to exploit that wonderfully easy transmission niche.
Meningitis is already out there. Maybe some form of Ebola will be next?
Next will be a new “Gospel” proving that Jesus had two or more wives. all named Mary. At least Polygamy is Biblical!
Probably should have been first, makes more sense than...
>>Unlike homosexual marriage, there aren’t any groups openly calling for it to become legal...
NAMBLA. North American Man Boy Love Association
Moslims
Excellent graphic.
And we’re seeing the same shifts in the APA diagnostic manual. Thinking your gender is different than your anatomy isn’t a mental illness unless you are upset about it or suicidal. Sexual attraction to children isn’t harshly condemned any more, even as they push to make sexual education to younger and younger ages mandatory. Polygamy is more acceptable, especially two gay couples raising children together and “open marriages” that destroy the meaning of marriage.
NAMBLA has been part of the gay movement from the start and still is integral.
Imagine the simplicity in Donald Trump’s life. Adding a new wife no longer requires paying off the old one.
In the book “N-Space”, a sci-fi anthology, Superman using in vitro fertilization and then acting as a male surrogate parent for his child was proposed as the way to save his race.
If there is nothing "special" about marriage being between one man and one woman; then, what is so special about the number 2?
Once you re-define something, it is open to being re-defined over and over again. The Left always denies the slippery slope; but, a slippery slope is inevitable. Once one group gets to redefine an institution for their agenda, you simply cannot keep out other re-definitions.
Lots of people have been predicting this. I’m convinced it will eventually happen. Sigh.
Adult-child sex is next.
Did you hear what happened in Italy last year?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3103193/posts
I like E.T. Williams’ response to it-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xo-ZS2WJGqU
“Big deal— Abraham, Jacob, David, Solomon, and others all had multiple wives....”
Yes, and in each case these plural “wives” brought them grief and harmed the Kingdom of Israel and the world. Also, by the time the Lord Jesus was on earth, plural marriage was no longer recognized. It actually was never “sanctioned” by God at all....more or less tolerated at best.
Ditto.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.