Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: CynicalBear

I did find this...

Pope Pius XII commented:

“Often there are theologians and preachers who, following in the footsteps of the holy Fathers, have been rather free in their use of events and expressions taken from Sacred Scripture to explain their belief in the Assumption.”... Yet he still based his argument on these writings, thereby conceding that there is no genuine biblical proof of the Assumption.


592 posted on 09/28/2014 7:07:31 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies ]


To: caww; CynicalBear
Yet he still based his argument on these writings, thereby conceding that there is no genuine biblical proof of the Assumption.

Do you want proof or evidence? And do you want it from an infallible source (e.g. the Magisterium) or only the Bible (which to clarify is infallible)? And I have to date seen no one disprove that Rev. 12 refers to Mary.
604 posted on 09/28/2014 7:11:58 PM PDT by ronnietherocket3 (Mary is understood by the heart, not study of scripture.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 592 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson