[ronnietherocket3]

Yet he still based his argument on these writings, thereby conceding that there is no genuine biblical proof of the Assumption.

Do you want proof or evidence? And do you want it from an infallible source (e.g. the Magisterium) or only the Bible (which to clarify is infallible)? And I have to date seen no one disprove that Rev. 12 refers to Mary.

[caww]

well...let’s here it..

.I already know the pope decided to make it so ...but that was in 1950?....Rather late late in the game.... What happened to all the centuries before...moreso what did Jesus have to say about this?

[Elsie]

And I have to date seen no one disprove that Rev. 12 refers to Mary.

Oh?

You manage to miss #236?

Read it and get back to us...

[Iscool]

And I have to date seen no one disprove that Rev. 12 refers to Mary.

The scriptures in chapter 12 prove it is not Mary...

[CynicalBear]

>>Do you want proof or evidence? <<

All right. Infallible evidence that the apostles taught the assumption of Mary.

>>And I have to date seen no one disprove that Rev. 12 refers to Mary.<<

Then you haven't been reading the posts on the subject.