It is interesting to not that you lack the honesty to address the situation Sakajaweau presented.
Someone comes to her and confesses to a crime another person is scheduled to die for. You twist that and make her a death row priest hearing confessions from people already serving time.
By changing the situation she presented you are lying. You make the confessor she received less likely to have been forthright. The perfidy is not unnoticed.
All that aside, in her scenario the confessor is dead. That person is either with God, or in hell. Nothing she says now will change that in any way. They aren’t here. It doesn’t matter to them now, their deeds are finished.
No, you are the one who is doing the twisting. I'm simply saying that she, the confessional priest, is violating her oath of confidentiality or whatever it is, and can no longer be trusted. In exchange for what? A confession by someone who could very well be lying?
If we were really honest we would say that the protestant position is to hypocritically use the law of exception (i.e., the law of love) found in situational ethics to reject an intrinsic and normative good that is the relieving of one's sinful burden and bringing them back into fellowship with Christ.
In other words, "Jesus for me but not for thee."
Oh?
The Book seems to indicate that they are SLEEPING; awaiting the Last Trump.