I knew what you were referencing and agree with you.
My comment was pointed at a person I feel takes offense at everything, when it's obvious what the statement is about.
You are correct, that your reference in 1 Kings happened centuries before the existence of the Catholic church. You were pointing out how somebody else lied and how IT COULD be done again.
As you mentioned in #51
In #51 you explained how you I certainly wasn't calling anyone here a liar but talking ,in general, that is why tradition does not hold the same weight as Scripture.
And yet 17 minutes later, in post #54, I was told to read #22 again. Basically, after what you just said in #51, they are still trying to claim that you accused Catholics of lying and I need to reread #22.
Thank you.
**My comment was pointed at a person I feel takes offense at everything, when it’s obvious what the statement is about.**
Then why wasn’t that person named in your post address box? (One of the rules, don’t you know?)