Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Response to the Cohabitation Epidemic
CRisis Magazinei ^ | December 11, 2014 | ARLAND K. NICHOLS

Posted on 12/11/2014 2:33:45 PM PST by NYer

couple graphic

The proliferation of research and literature about the sexual and marital habits of “Millennials” is staggering. Research indicates a casual or cavalier approach to sexual intimacy and of marriage. Marriage is increasingly postponed or rejected in favor of transitional “trial marriages” or temporary live-in situations glamorized today in popular media as “the next step” in intimate relationships.

The intimate relationship choices of young adults today expose a culture that increasingly fails to appreciate moral norms and the inherent value and beauty of marriage. The rapid acceptance of cohabitation and the dissolution of a culture of marriage in the wake of the sexual revolution pose a significant challenge to the Catholic Church in the United States. A thoughtful and creative effort to foster a culture of marriage is desperately needed.

Couples today cohabit for numerous reasons: more time together, financial concerns, and fear of the commitment of marriage or fear of divorce. Others slip into it out of convenience, some want to test their compatibility, while still others are actively rebelling against their parents or ethical upbringing. All told, it is believed that between 50-70 percent of couples today are cohabiting before marriage. Catholics reflect national trends in spite of the Church’s consistent teaching that cohabitation and premature sexual relations are a “grave sin” and “contrary to the moral law” (CCC 2390).

Sadly, couples who choose cohabitation choose a risky route that will lead to more heartbreak rather than fulfillment of the deepest longings of the heart. As Mark Regnerus and Jeremy Uecker note in their recent book, Premarital Sex in America, “Cohabitation is still about uncertainty and risk management for both men and women. It’s holding back to see how things go … cohabitation is inherently unstable.”

The CDC has noted that only 40 percent of first-time cohabiters are married within three years. Nearly 20 percent of women will become pregnant in the first year of cohabiting. Only 26 percent of women who become pregnant while cohabiting will get married within the year. The “decrease in the probability of marriage among women who [become] pregnant in a cohabiting union” expose mother and child to a host of well-known negative outcomes. In short, cohabitation increases the likelihood of numerous negative outcomes for women while essentially granting to men all the “benefits” of marriage without men having any responsibilities. Regnerus and Uecker concur, noting that “Cohabitation is a win-win situation for men: more stable access to sex, without the expectations or commitments of marital responsibilities.”

But statistics are usually unconvincing when they are presented to the young. (It’s romantic, after all, to take risks and break trends.) Sharing doctrine as though it is a lifeless list of what you cannot do is also ineffective. Although the final relatio of the extraordinary synod on the family did not directly address cohabitation, the bishops suggest an approach that relies more upon honey and less upon vinegar. They write, “The primacy of grace needs to be highlighted and, consequently, the possibilities which the Spirit provides in the Sacrament. It is a question of allowing people to experience the Gospel of the Family is a joy which ‘fills hearts and lives,’ because in Christ we are ‘set free from sin, sorrow, inner emptiness, and loneliness.” As a starting point a cohabiting couple might be asked, “As a gift to your loved one, would you like to avail yourself of every good means that will give you grace, and help you grow together in joy and freedom?” Encountering them first at this natural inclination of the human mind and heart may open them to permanence in love between one man and one woman—marriage.

We must seize opportunities to encounter and then move couples whose relationships do not embrace the fullness of the teaching on marriage, toward a full embrace of the beautiful, true, and freeing message of God’s plan for their relationship. Clergy working with engaged couples, parents whose children cohabit, and faithful peers need to accompany and evangelize the young and couples who are cohabiting. “The pace of this accompaniment,” the synod bishops remind us, “must be steady and reassuring, reflecting a closeness and compassion which, at the same time, heals, liberates and encourages growth in the Christian life.” Encountering and being friendly with a couple living in grave sin is not sufficient. Encountering young persons or couples who are already cohabiting where they are, and then accompanying them toward a greater maturity and toward a healthy and holy intimate relationships is vital.

Such a pastoral approach does not condone sexual sin, but rather steadily moves couples from sin to a free embrace of God’s beautiful plan for marriages. Evangelizers will be most effective in inviting conversion if couples are, in the words of Pope Francis, “enabled to receive the good news not from evangelizers who are dejected, discouraged, impatient and anxious but from ministers of the Gospel whose lives glow with fervor, who have first received the joy of Christ.”

The high rates of cohabitation, the reality of sin, and the hazards for couples who have, at the outset of their relationship, chosen this way of living, compels Catholics to accompany couples on a steady journey toward greater appreciation of the sweetness of married life and the grace that will set them free to fulfill the deepest hopes for their intimate relationships.



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: catholic; cohabitation; marriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 12/11/2014 2:33:45 PM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; GregB; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; Ronaldus Magnus; tiki; Salvation; ...

Check out the comments at the link, especially the first one, ping!


2 posted on 12/11/2014 2:35:27 PM PST by NYer ("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I always told our kids to live with their fiance at least a year BEFORE they got married to them. It works! But don’t live with someone you don’t plan to marry! and you don’t have to sleep with, or have sex with them, before marriage.


3 posted on 12/11/2014 2:54:58 PM PST by buffyt ( Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke said President Barack Obama encouraged Ferguson RIOTS!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: NYer

Actually everyone I knew who got married in 1960s-70s lived together first, during college. Graduated, got married, still married. My mother who was born in 1920s said all her friends had sex before marriage, she told me they got married “because they figured they better” They were almost all PG and had a baby within nine months or less! She told me a lot of kids were claimed to be Premature! LOL For them it was WWII that hastened their coupling. FOr my generation it was VN war.


5 posted on 12/11/2014 3:00:11 PM PST by buffyt ( Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke said President Barack Obama encouraged Ferguson RIOTS!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

My 25 year old daughter spends several days a week at her boyfriends house.

They are respectful of our rules when they stay at our house, which means no sleeping together.

They are about to get engaged. He is a decent guy, in the USAR, and respects her and us.

At some point threatening to take away the iPhone doesn’t work any more.

My other daughter who is a senior in college is chained to the floor of the bedroom when she is home.

It’s amazing how two kids can be so different.


6 posted on 12/11/2014 3:10:54 PM PST by Vermont Lt (Ebola: Death is a lagging indicator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buffyt

” My mother who was born in 1920s said all her friends had sex before marriage, she told me they got married “because they figured they better” They were almost all PG and had a baby within nine months or less!”


Oh boy,the “secret” is out.

:-)

.


7 posted on 12/11/2014 3:16:12 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NYer

And then there are the old retired folks, widows and widowers who live together because getting married mucks up their retirement income and social security payments.


8 posted on 12/11/2014 3:24:53 PM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Every engaged couple needs to attend an Engaged Encounter weekend.

http://engagedencounter.org/


9 posted on 12/11/2014 3:30:05 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

10 posted on 12/11/2014 3:30:36 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

My late uncle was a widow. His deceased wife’s best friend was also widowed. The two couples had spent years together... dinners, vacations, etc.. So, you now had two widowed people who had common interests and been in each other’s lives for 30 years. They “secretly” moved in together. They kept it very, very quiet because they were afraid they would upset their adult children. Finally, my cousin came to him and said, “Dad, for the love of God.. please marry her. The grandchildren are talking. You aren’t setting a good example!” We lost both just a few years ago. Funny in a way because marriage 2 lasted longer.. both died close to 100 years of age.


11 posted on 12/11/2014 3:56:40 PM PST by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NYer

If it was confined to millennials it would be bad enough. But there is a lot of this going on in older age groups, as well.


12 posted on 12/11/2014 3:58:42 PM PST by Bigg Red (Congress, do your duty and repo his pen and his phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buffyt

I always told our kids to live with their fiance at least a year BEFORE they got married to them. It works!

and you don’t have to sleep with, or have sex with them, before marriage.


Yep the first part works pretty good, one year use of a free cow.

Then quit and do it again some where else, that is as old as the hills but it was only taught in boys clubs or pool halls so it was not as wide spread.

The second part could only be managed by an eunuch and what would they be wanting to get married for?


13 posted on 12/11/2014 4:01:17 PM PST by ravenwolf (` Does the scripture explain it in full detail? if not how can you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

No kidding!

I for one am a very proud Mother that my daughter has made the choice to NOT live with her boyfriend. Of course I had a hand in this discussion as I did live with my ex before marriage. Big freakin mistake...

If two young adults can’t figure out how to get to know one another without living together, then perhaps they are not mature enough to engage in marriage. This topic makes me nuts!


14 posted on 12/11/2014 4:09:33 PM PST by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BJ1
Why the eff would a man want to live with a woman he wasn’t have sex with?

=========================================

Your response made sense. "buffyts" didn't.

15 posted on 12/11/2014 4:51:04 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Apparently this might be a lie since all the stats I've EVER heard say that premarital cohabitation is a 50% guarantee of marriage failure.

But, mine is a Catholic response. Perhaps some of the Protestants here might have a different one. I can't lump them all together either, so I would be interested in their different perspective. Isn't it a sin for Protestants too?

16 posted on 12/11/2014 4:54:00 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AllAmericanGirl44
No kidding!
I for one am a very proud Mother that my daughter has made the choice to NOT live with her boyfriend. Of course I had a hand in this discussion as I did live with my ex before marriage. Big freakin mistake...
If two young adults can’t figure out how to get to know one another without living together, then perhaps they are not mature enough to engage in marriage. This topic makes me nuts!

Ah me, the wisdom of maturity.
Young people were TAUGHT to disregard the "old fashioned" values, weren't they? I WONDER who taught them. YOU sure told your story the way it REALLY is. Good for you.
Your daughter is a very small lady. Got her smarts from you VIA your wisdom and advice.

17 posted on 12/11/2014 4:57:36 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

God did not discriminate by religion when the Bible was inspired. I Thess Chapter 4: Vs 1-11 gives a clear picture on sexual immorality, which is fornication, adultery, and the one we aren’t allowed to talk about anymore in Romans Ch 1...last few paragraphs; and all other ones in Bible outside of marriage.

So ALL PEOPLE have same requirements in God’s Word...He is an equal opportunity God.


18 posted on 12/11/2014 5:00:23 PM PST by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The newest trend now is to live with someone and refer to them as your fiancé, whether you plan on getting married or not, and usually it’s the “not”.


19 posted on 12/11/2014 5:22:32 PM PST by murron (Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: murron

People don’t even have to be living together to be fiancé/fiancée. They just have to be having sex. In a similar manner, sex-partners of a parent are described in the news as stepfather/stepmother, especially when the child is missing or murdered.


20 posted on 12/11/2014 6:38:46 PM PST by Tax-chick (R.I.P., Dad, 11/25/14. Thanks for the lawyers, guns, and money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson