Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: CynicalBear

It’s clearly out of the Roman Catholic, and I think, Orthodox traditions. The Orthodox are more likely to say Theotokos, which I think is God-Bearer, so if that translation is correct, then I have fewer issues with that term.

It all is tied up with the late agreed upon doctrine of the immaculate conception, which is problematic for a number of reasons, the most important being:

1. Lack of scriptural support

2. Taking from Mary her humanity

3. Questionable logic.


3,043 posted on 12/23/2014 4:46:49 PM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3041 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
>>It’s clearly out of the Roman Catholic, and I think, Orthodox traditions.<<

It clearly originated much farther back than that. Ishtar, who was worshipped as the "Mother of God and Queen of Heaven" who was impregnated by the pagan god Baal whose son was Tammuz the son of Baal. You can find hints of how God felt about the worship of Baal in Babylon in Ezekiel 8.

3,046 posted on 12/23/2014 5:29:51 PM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3043 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson