Give me a specific statement of mine which you believe to be "personal opinion, No proof". If you make an accusation at least give me the opportunity to provide the proof. Do you dare?
Just read your comments on post 28.
There is nothing in your post 27 but your opinion or false statements about the teachings of the Catholic Church.
So your authority or opinion is greater than anyone else’s authority, especially the Catholic Church that was delegated by Christ to spread the word and baptize in the name of Jesus?
I realize that you only believe in sola scripture, so you are missing out on the Sacred traditions and the oral teachings that were passed down by the early Catholics and the teachings of the Catholic Church on current issues.
From: http://www.cuf.org/2005/02/that-they-may-all-be-one-the-difference-the-church-makes/
God understood that simply communicating His truth—whether in written or oral fashion—would not be sufficient to safeguard truth and associated unity among His people. Given our fallen human nature, self-righteous anarchy is bound to occur in the absence of clearly established, God-given authority. So He appointed visible leaders throughout salvation history to protect His people when truth and unity were threatened.
These men of the Old Testament and the Protestant Reformers made similar mistakes. Both rebellions denied that God had appointed human leaders to govern and intercede for His people. Consequently, both invoked the equality of all believers as a means to reject divinely established human leaders of God’s people. Both sought communion with God without the “encumbrance” of God’s governance through His chosen human instruments. The rebellion of both disrupted communion with God and caused disunity among believers.
The historical record illustrates that the Early Church, including the Fathers and ecumenical councils, understood and accepted papal primacy as the authoritative means that God established to combat heresy and maintain unity.