Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: boatbums

In other words, although Jesus made abundantly clear throughout his public life that FAITH is decisive in our relationship with God, he stupidly confused the issue—which was ALREADY perfectly clear—by introducing a lot of GRAPHIC language about “gnawing,” “chewing,” and “munching” on his flesh, and drinking his blood.

Oh, yes. “Gnawing,” “chewing,” and “munching” on flesh are such obvious metaphors that ANYBODY would think of as a way of talking about “believing.”

Yeah. When I read the weather report in the morning, I always “munch” on it, “chew” on it, and “gnaw” on it.

Yeah. “This is my body, which is given up for you...This is the chalice of my blood...” Right. ANYBODY would interpret those words to mean, “believe.”


242 posted on 01/30/2015 12:32:28 AM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]


To: Arthur McGowan; boatbums
and he did eat the scroll" so Catholics literally eat the paper the words are written on right?
254 posted on 01/30/2015 6:57:17 AM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan
In other words, although Jesus made abundantly clear throughout his public life that FAITH is decisive in our relationship with God, he stupidly confused the issue—which was ALREADY perfectly clear—by introducing a lot of GRAPHIC language about “gnawing,” “chewing,” and “munching” on his flesh, and drinking his blood. Oh, yes. “Gnawing,” “chewing,” and “munching” on flesh are such obvious metaphors that ANYBODY would think of as a way of talking about “believing.” Yeah. When I read the weather report in the morning, I always “munch” on it, “chew” on it, and “gnaw” on it. Yeah. “This is my body, which is given up for you...This is the chalice of my blood...” Right. ANYBODY would interpret those words to mean, “believe.”

You've never used the phrase, "I'll chew on that awhile."? Tell me, do Catholics allow people to "chew" on the Eucharist wafer now, because when I was a young Roman Catholic, it was forbidden to use your teeth and chew on the thing. What is so hard about seeing metaphors and imagery for what it is? To "gnaw", "chew", "munch" translated from the Greek word "trogo" is a present active participle, as is the Greek "pino", for drink/imbibe, and connotes on ongoing, keeping on, continuous action of eating and drinking. Seeing as we don't chew (put to the tooth) the Communion bread (you don't do you?), then grabbing the tense of the Greek words to somehow prove they aren't metaphor, is over reaching even for Roman Catholicism. Faith in Christ IS ongoing and when we receive Him as Savior/the Bread of Life, we will never hunger or thirst, but are continuously fed by the Spirit. The life we are given is not physical nor carnal, but is spiritual and everlasting.

And getting back to my original point, you cannot help but agree that the bread and wine do NOT physically change to human flesh and blood - it HAS TO BE symbolic and a metaphor. Up until the Platonic and Aristotelian Greek philosophy crept in and words like "transubstance" got used to rationalize the "mystery" of the Lord's Supper, Christians got along just fine understanding that by our faith, belief, we are partaking in the sacrifice of Christ's body and blood for our sins. It was an profession - an outward act - of faith, much like baptism, to remind us of the grace of God and to be an outward testimony to others of our inner faith - a faith that endures to the end.

356 posted on 01/30/2015 5:29:40 PM PST by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson