Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Defense of Pius XII
http://the-american-catholic.com ^ | February 11, 2015 | Donald R. McClarey

Posted on 02/12/2015 6:19:47 PM PST by NKP_Vet

The guy whose behavior during the Nazi occupation converted the chief rabbi of Rome to Catholicism was working with the Nazis? The guy who was supposedly so silent and passive, at best, did enough that EWTN found a dozen paged of quotes from contemporary Jewish sources that were favorable to his behavior? A Pope who is defended from such accusations by a Jewish historian (formerly of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America) who not only debunks the claims, but describes Pius XII as the greatest friend to Jews of the 20th century? The man who, at his death, got this official condolence from Golda Meir, Israel’s delegate to the UN: “When fearful martyrdom came to our people in the decade of Nazi terror, the voice of the pope was raised for the victims. The life of our times was enriched by a voice speaking out on the great moral truths above the tumult of daily conflict. We mourn a great servant of peace.”

This man gets described as “Hitler’s Pope”?

Ah, such is the power of a well-crafted story, even if that craft is used for evil ends.

I’ll start at the beginning: it was a KGB plot. (I told you this was ridiculous– I can’t help it if the USSR lived down to bad 80s movies.)

Go here (at link) to read the brilliant rest. Lies are ever plentiful in this Vale of Tears but Truth will ultimately prevail.

(Excerpt) Read more at the-american-catholic.com ...


TOPICS: Apologetics; General Discusssion; History; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: hitlerspope
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
"the story of “Hitler’s Pope” is not just a lie, it’s deliberately malicious slander that is unsupported by history".
1 posted on 02/12/2015 6:19:47 PM PST by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
For this, as well as for a host of reasons, Ion Pacepa's Disinformation is one of the most important books of our times.
2 posted on 02/12/2015 6:32:58 PM PST by jobim (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

While Eugenio Zolli (the chief rabbi of Rome) was a devoted friend of Eugenio Pacelli (Pius XII) and worked closely with him in saving thousands of Jews, and took “Eugenio” as his baptismal name when he was baptized after the war, he actually became a believing Christian before the war, as a result of Jewish prophecy. He remained at his post as chief rabbi through the war because he did not want to appear to be abandoning his people in time of persecution.


3 posted on 02/12/2015 7:33:47 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

Pius XII created agencies to coordinate relief work. American Jews and Cardinal Spellman channeled throughout the Pope generous humanitarian aid for the Jews.

From the first days of the war, Pope Pius XII distributed untold sums to aid the Jews all over Nazi occupied Europe. One of Pius XII’s first steps at the beginning of the War was the creation of two official agencies with pontifical rank to coordinate relief work, the Pontifical Aid Commission and the Office for Information. The first body, in liaison with local organizations, channeled supplies of food, medicine, and clothing, to the needy, to the prisoners of war in particular. It was a task of vast proportions involving 40 countries; financial grants were provided for the repatriation of 630,000 displaced persons; full responsibility was taken for 53,000 victims. Church authorities joined forces with national and international Jewish agencies. American Jews also trusted on the hands of the Pope large sums that were distributed according to the wishes of the donors. Cardinal Spellman also channeled generous humanitarian aid from the U.S. Catholics.

The Vatican Information Office handled over one and a quarter million requests and succeeded in locating over half a million of the displaced persons, mostly Jews, a success ratio of 44 percent, in spite of the non cooperation from the Nazis and little, if at all, cooperation from the Allies. The communication with prisoners of war was another of its important services. Both Agencies were under the direction of Msgr. Giovanni Battista Montini, the future Pope Paul VI.


4 posted on 02/12/2015 7:41:19 PM PST by Dqban22 (Hpo<p> http://i.imgur.com/26RbAPxjpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
But he was silent!

His 1942 Christmas or Christmas Eve broadcast was the only mention of the Holocaust, and it was so sanitized that it did not mention that many victims were Jewish, and did not mention that the bad guys were Nazis, Germans, the SS, or the like. Even the Allied governments went further than that with their public pronouncements in 1942, and they failed to bomb the train lines to the death camps. If actions speak louder than words, then the Allied governments could speak correctly but failed to act. The Pope however, could not even speak the truth.

He was afraid to speak out on one of the defining moral issues of the century, heck one of the greatest moral tragedies since Jesus lived

It is great that the Pope tried to help Jews privately, but his main mission is to speak the truth clearly and publicly, and this he failed to do.

I am not saying that he is Hitler's Pope, for that is a slander. It is great that he helped hundreds of Jews privately, but it he had spoken out, maybe millions of Jews and others would have had a chance to live.

5 posted on 02/12/2015 8:01:19 PM PST by LovedSinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LovedSinner
"Voices in hindsight are judging the "Popes" silence without considering the consequences of "speaking out." Those critics do not recall that the Pope had been advised by Jewish leaders and by the bishops in occupied countries not to protest publicly against Nazi atrocities. However, Pius XII frequently invoked "God's vengeance" on the persecutors. His words were the brave words of a diplomat who put focus on "those who are responsible."

"Whenever Pius XII spoke out, there was immediate retaliation by the Nazis. There were more than sixty protests! The so-called "silence" of Pope Pius XII is a myth."

his main mission is to speak the truth clearly and publicly, and this he failed to do.

Funny how those alive at the time understood his many statements perfectly.

6 posted on 02/12/2015 8:13:59 PM PST by pbear8 (the Lord is my light and my salvation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LovedSinner

“but if he had spoken out, maybe millions of Jews and others would have had a chance to live”. Now the truth.

http://www.catholicleague.org/the-real-story-of-pius-xii-and-the-jews-2/

“It is estimated that the actions of Pius XII directly led to the saving of 800,000 Jewish lives during the war. The estimate of 800,000 Jewish lives is based upon the testimony of the post-war government of the recently created State of Israel which recognized and honored that pope’s contribution. The Israelis recognized the figure and a forest of as many trees was planted in commemoration in the Negeb, SE of Jerusalem, and was shown to Pope Paul VI with some ceremony on his first state visit to Israel. Rev. Fr. Jean Charles-Roux, now a Rosininian priest living in London and whose father was French Ambassador to the Holy See in the 30’s, lived with his family in Rome during the fateful pre-war period. He recalls that the Pope told his father as early as 1935 that the new regime in Germany was “diabolical.” The Ambassador frequently warned his government but the general reaction in France seems to have been that it was good to see the back of the Prussian militarist and that it was no bad thing that an Austrian-Czech house painter was now Chancellor”.


7 posted on 02/12/2015 8:17:52 PM PST by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
Give me a break!

800,000 Jews is probably 25% or 50% of all the Jews in Nazi territory that lived through the war.

It is an absolutely ridiculous statistic. The Pope cannot be directly credited for the lives saved by Zegota or the other networks. And furthermore, most Jews were saved by individuals not affiliated with any network.

Your link also praised Pius XII's silence as wonderful because Hitler would have been even worse had Pius XII spoke out. But really? Hitler went all out to kill Jews, if Pius XII spoke out, it might be able to knock some "Ordinary Men" back into sense.

The truth will set you free, not appeasing dictators through silence.

8 posted on 02/12/2015 8:30:58 PM PST by LovedSinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pbear8
The Pope was criticized at the time for losing his moral authority.

The Allied governments spoke out much stronger than the Pope. Were they anti-Jewish?

The Pope was considered an Allied sympathizer by Germans and silent by the Allied governments. He was trying to be neutral.

By the way, I am Catholic, and I hate how holy Hell comes upon any ideas which suggest that the Popes are bad. It is Catholic propaganda, the Catholic party line.

9 posted on 02/12/2015 8:34:55 PM PST by LovedSinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LovedSinner

He wasn’t. I have read some of his pieces that were in the NY Times. I used to have them bookmarked long ago but I haven’t been able to find them. The links were on FR about 2000.

I do think that he stopped after the Nazis started murdering Catholics every time he spoke up and his messages weren’t as forceful, but he did speak up. He was one of the first to do so even before he was pope.


10 posted on 02/12/2015 9:23:39 PM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

For later.


11 posted on 02/12/2015 9:32:17 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LovedSinner
Read these, then we can discuss the issue -

http://www.amazon.com/Yours-Precious-Witness-Memoirs-Catholics/dp/0809104857/ref=pd_sim_b_25?ie=UTF8&refRID=09R336TEH3JDVTVMR74S

Written by a rabbi - http://www.amazon.com/The-Myth-Hitlers-Pope-Against/dp/0895260344

Mostly try reading, "Pope Pius XII and World War II, The Documented Truth: A Compilation of International Evidence Revealing the Wartime Acts of the Vatican" Gary L Kripp. This book has many photocopies of news articles. and documents from the time, read them yourself, no need to rely on someone else's account

12 posted on 02/12/2015 10:07:08 PM PST by pbear8 (the Lord is my light and my salvation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LovedSinner

I believe a retaliation (possibly when his predecessor spoke out) caused the Vatican to re-think that policy, though German clergy were persecuted for their pronouncement from the pulpit challenging National Socialism.

Don’t defend the Allies, especially the Soviets who forged their non-aggression pact with Hitler after Kristallnacht (and proceeded to divide eastern Europe with him according to that agreement, dooming countless Polish Jews in addition to other Poles).


13 posted on 02/13/2015 2:14:01 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LovedSinner

While Japan slaughtered millions of Chinese and other Asians (as well as plenty of Americans), the Soviet Union maintained a ceasefire with them until the final months of the war. What moral authority do “the allied governments” have on this issue? They had refused to take in many Jews leading up to the slaughter, and ending it was not a priority of theirs at all. In fact, when Stalin had cleared the USSR of Nazis, he waited until he was offered mastery of Eastern Europe before he moved on to Berlin; hardly a hero.


14 posted on 02/13/2015 2:18:52 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LovedSinner
The Pope was criticized at the time for losing his moral authority.

Criticized by his enemies. He had to balance the benefits versus the costs of public statements. He was taking action behind the scenes. Attempting to protect the Church behind German lines was clearly also a moral consideration.

15 posted on 02/13/2015 6:02:03 AM PST by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LovedSinner

This board is for conservatives. Take a hike!


16 posted on 02/13/2015 7:34:31 AM PST by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LovedSinner

“Those who ignore history are damned to repeat it.” George Santayana.

During the Holocaust no other organization did more to save the Jews than the Catholic Church. History repeats itself. Jews are under the threat of another Holocaust and one more time the Catholics, and Christians in general, are in support the Jewish people. Don’t bite the hand of your proven friends based in prejudices born out of disinformation and falsehoods.

The slander of Pius XII was a KGB anti-Catholi9c propaganda that was discredited by the founders of the state of Israel and Jewish scholars who were prime witnesses of the history of the Holocaust. It is up to you to believe or not the testimony of the founders of Israel.

Israel Honors Pius XII

Israeli senior diplomat and now Orthodox Jewish Rabbi, Pinchas Lapide, with access to Yad Vashem’s archives, has stated in his book, “Three Popes and the Jews”, that “The Catholic Church relief and rescue program under the pontificate of Pius XII was instrumental in saving the lives of as many as 860,000 Jews from certain death at Nazi’s hands. That was more than all other Churches, religious institutions and international rescue organizations put together.” (17) The Israelis recognized the lives saved by planting a forest, in commemoration, of as many trees in the Negeb, SE of Jerusalem. This forest was shown to Pope Paul VI during his first state visit to Israel.

At the end of the War, the World Jewish Congress, the American Jewish Committee, Albert Einstein, and many other prominent Jewish leaders expressed their deep gratitude toward Pius XII and the Catholic Church. On the death of Pius XII (1958), Golda Meir, the Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs, gave a heartfelt eulogy for the Pope before the UN Assembly.

In his scholar book, “The Last Three Popes and the Jews”, Lapide said that Pius XII was one of the few world leaders outside the Jewry itself who was quick to recognize the danger of Nazism. Lapide demonstrates convincingly the consistent and active protection provided to the Jews in Europe by the papacy. In Lapide’s words:

“When armed force ruled well-nigh omnipotent, and morality was at its lowest ebb, Pius XI commanded non of the former and could only appeal to the latter, in confronting with bare hands, the full might of evil.

A sounding protest, which might turn out to be self-thwarting-or quiet piecemeal rescue? Loud words- or prudent deeds? The dilemma must have been sheer agony, for whichever course he chose horrible consequences were inevitable. Unable to cure the sickness of an entire civilization, and unwilling to bear the brunt of Hitler’s fury, the Pope, unlike many far mightier than he, alleviated, relieved, appealed, petitioned-and saved as most efficient he could by his own lights.

Who, but a prophet or a martyr could have done much more?
The Talmud teaches us that ‘whoever preserves one life, it is accounted to him by Scripture as if he had preserved a whole world.’

If this is true-and it is as true as that of most Jewish of tenets, the sanctity of human life-then Pius XII deserves that forest in Judean hills, which kindly people of Israel proposed for him in October 1958. A memorial forest with 860,000 trees.” (Emphasis added. “Three Popes and the Jews.” pp.267-269)

The relationship of trust and collaboration during WW II between the Holy See, the Jewish organizations, the Allies’ intelligence services and their governments, including the anti-Nazi German Generals, is well proven and documented. However, there is not the slightest thread of evidence to substantiate the preposterous and vicious allegations raised against Pius XII and the Catholic Church of collaboration or sympathizing with the Nazis.

Did the Church do enough to save the Jews? As usual those who do the less complain the most and those who do the most always think they could have done even more. When Michael O’Carroll, author of the scholar book “Pius XII: Greatness Dishonoured” related in the Foreword that in 1957 he met Dr. Isaac Herzog, Chief Rabbi of Israel, and he told him with emotion of an audience he had with the Pope and how they discussed the prophet Ezechiel. “My blessing to him” said the saintly old man, and O’Carroll promised to be the bearer of the message of his goodwill. When O’Carroll gave the message to Pius XII he added “I think Jews everywhere are grateful for what you did for them during the war.” “I wish I could have done more” was the Pope’s reply.

On February 28, 1945, the Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem, Isaac Herzog, sent a letter of gratitude to the
Apostolic Nuncio in Rumania, Msgr. Andrea Cassulo, stating that: “The people of Israel will never forget what His Holiness and his illustrious delegates, inspired by the eternal principles of religion which form the very foundations of civilization, are doing for us unfortunate brothers and sisters in the most tragic hour of our history, which is living prove of divine Providence in this world.” (31)

Rabbi Herzog’s heartfelt words should suffice to forever end the slanderous attacks to the memory of the great protector of the Jews, Pius XII and the Catholic Church.

Those testimonies aforementioned, as powerful as they might be, are just a few samples of the hundreds of messages of gratitude sent to Pius XII by Jews from around the world. There are at least 4 to 5 million descendants of those 860,000 Jews around the world whose lives were saved by Pius XII and the Catholic Church. They should be able to bring to light much more valuable documentation if they were to delve into their family’s historical records, the Israeli’s archives, and so many other serious, unbiased, Jewish scholarly research in this matter.

To those seeking the truth, what a better witness than the testimony of Albert Einstein, the great Jewish physicist, who had first hand experience of the horrors of Nazism? In 1944 he said: “Being a lover of freedom, when the Nazi revolution came in Germany, I looked to the universities to defend it, but the universities were immediately silenced. Then I looked to the great editors of newspapers, but they, like the universities were silenced in a few short weeks. Then I looked to individual writers…they too were mute. Only the Church,” Einstein concluded, “stood squarely across the path of Hitler’s campaign for suppressing the truth…I never had any special interest in the Church before, but now I feel great affection and admiration…and am forced thus to confess that what I once despised, I now praise unreservedly.”(33)

Just as the evils of the Holocaust must never be forgotten, neither should the kindness of those spiritual brothers from another faith who tried to help the Jews, at the risk of their own lives, under the most enormously dangerous travails be forgotten. The truth will prevail and with it, a greater understanding and brotherhood among Jews and Catholics.


17 posted on 02/13/2015 8:19:15 AM PST by Dqban22 (Hpo<p> http://i.imgur.com/26RbAPxjpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2

THE RESCUE OF THE JEWS. The Holy See made every possible effort to help the Jews.

Jewish population in Europe as the war begins

When Hitler came to power, about 6 million Jews lived in Central and Western Europe and 3 million inside the Soviet Union. About 600,000 were German, 180,000 Austrian, 270,000 French, 340,000 British, 150,000 Dutch, 360,000 Checks, 500,000 Hungarian, and 3 ½ million Poles. The first attacks against the German Jews started in March 1933 by way of several anti-Semite laws. Albert Einstein, Sigmund Freud and many other important scientists were among the 100,000 Jews who were able to escape between 1933 and 1939.

While the Catholic Church gave refuge to thousands of Jews in Nazi occupied Europe, FDR denied refuge inn U.S. to Jews trying to flee from then Nazis and England close the doors of Palestine to the Jews who tried to scape from the Nazis.

THE ALLIES WERE SLOW IN RESPONDING TO THE JEW’S PLEAS.

Unfortunately, anti-Semitism and anti-Catholicism exist even today. Certainly there was anti-Semitism at that time all around the world, but it was not mainly from Catholics and much less from the Catholic Church. Germany was not alone; there was plenty of anti-Semitism in the highest spheres of the Allied governments.

Jewish historian Richard Breitman has written five books, one on the Holocaust and another on Nazism. He is, up to this day, the only person authorized to study the OSS secret documents of U.S. espionage during WWII. The Italian newspaper “Corriere della Sera.” interviewed him on June 29, 2000. In the article, Breitman not only confirms the role played by Pius XII in defending and safeguarding the persecuted during the Nazi regime but he also found “the Allied silence on the Holocaust surprising.

Their first testimonies are from the end of 1942…” He also remarked that the documents denoted how the Nazis considered that the Vatican was in the side of the Allies. (10)

The reaction of the US, French and British governments at that time, and even later, when knowledge of the concentration camps existed, were certainly not in solidarity for the persecuted Jews. In the middle of the genocide, Britain closed the doors of Palestine to the Jews. The U.S. government accepted a total of 10,000-15,000 Jewish refugees throughout the war – a truly scandalous statistic.

Jewish leaders ask Allies to bomb railway lines to concentration camps

The posturing with strong public declarations followed by the empty deeds of the allied leaders did not save any Jewish lives. On June 6, 1944, Dr. Chaim Weizmann, the well known Zionist leader, later president of Israel, proposed to the British Minister, Anthony Eden, that the railway line to Auschwitz should be bombed. The British, after consultation, denied the request alleging the “great technical difficulties involved.” As the Jews died by the thousands daily, why was there not a rescue plan on the Allied side to counter the Nazi machinery of extermination? The Allies had already dropped tens of thousands of bombs on German cities. Why was that simple request which would have saved hundreds of thousands Jews and Christians refused? Later on, J.F. Martin, chief private secretary of Winston Churchill, explained “the great technical difficulties.” In a letter to Dr. Weizmann he wrote that they had discussed the matter with the Soviets and that the Soviets vetoed it.

When the evacuation of over 60,000 Jews from Bulgaria was suggested, Eden replied that the whole problem with the Jews was very difficult. “If we do that (said Eden) then the Jews of the world will be wanting us to make similar offers in Poland and Germany.” (11)

In 1943, there was a memorandum from British embassy sent to the U.S. State Department expressing their fear that the Germans may “change over from a policy of extermination to one of extrusion, and aim, as they did before the war, at embarrassing other countries by flooding them with refugees.” The State Department blocked, with Roosevelt’s connivance, efforts in Congress to help the Jewish refugees on their way to Palestine. (12)

The Jews depended on the success of The Catholic Church’s lone efforts -they had no other friends on the side of the Allies.


18 posted on 02/13/2015 8:30:39 AM PST by Dqban22 (Hpo<p> http://i.imgur.com/26RbAPxjpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LovedSinner

As Jeno Levai, the foremost scholar of the Holocaust in Hungary, said of Pius XII that it was “a particularly regrettable irony that the one person in all occupied Europe who did more than anyone else to halt the dreadful crime and alleviate its consequences is today made the scapegoat for the failures of others.”

In 1937, Pius XI published the Encyclical “Mit Brennender Sorge,” stating that Catholics must never be anti-Semite.

On March 14, 1937, before it was fashionable to denounce the German Führer as a villain and long before the creation of the concentration camps and the gas chambers, Pius XI, ably seconded by his Secretary of State, wrote the Encyclical “Mit Brennender Sorge” meaning “with burning anxiety”. It dealt with the nazi threat to racial minorities and specifically the Jews addressing the Encyclical directly to the German people. The Encyclical exhorted that Catholics must never be anti-Semitic because “we are all Semites spiritually” and ought to hold the Jewish people in high regard accordingly.

The Encyclical exposed to the world the III Reich’s persecution of the Catholic Church as well as the incompatibility between the principles of the National Socialism and those of the Catholic faith. The German government prohibited the entrance of the Encyclical to the country and it became necessary to smuggle it into Germany under the nose of the ruthless Gestapo. On Sunday March 21, The Encyclical was read from 12,000 Catholic pulpits across Germany. As a result, the Nazi’s campaign of innuendoes against The Church as well as the persecution of Catholics worsened.

The German Catholic hierarchy thanked Pope Pius XI for the letter, which strongly condemned both, racism and anti-Semitism. The Pope pointed to Cardinal Pacelli saying that it was he who had been responsible for the Encyclical. It was the Secretary of State, who asked the German Cardinal Faulhaber to submit a draft text, which he amended carefully. Pacelli also bore the burden of its defense when the Encyclical was the subject of strong German diplomatic protests; he did so personally, not by delegation.

Pope Pius XII’s first Encyclical, “Summi Pontificatus”, in 1939, attacks Nazism and Communism

Pius XII’s first encyclical on October 27, 1939, “Summi Pontificatus” reiterated the attack on the German regime and the Gestapo was ordered to prevent its distribution. In it, the Pope declared his position “against exacerbated nationalism, the idolatry of the state, totalitarianism, racism, the cult of brutal force, contempt of international agreements”, against all the characteristics of Hitler’s political system; he laid the responsibility for the scourge of the war on these aberrations. The Allies airdropped 88,000 copies of the Encyclical over Germany.

WERE PIUS XII AND THE CHURCH REALLY SILENT DURING THE HOLOCAUST?

The Pope was well aware that any public denunciation against Hitler would make things even worse for the Jews. His polices were aimed at saving the Jews. In fact, that was the same policy followed by the International Red Cross and the World Council of Churches both based in Geneva as well as the one recommended by most of the International Jewish organizations involved in the rescue operations of Jews. Gerhart Riegner, the representative of the World Jewish Congress in Geneva, accepted the validity of this policy –preferring action rather than words, as the common goal.

Historian Fr. W. Saunders has stated that we must remember that any defiance of the Nazi regime meant immediate and severe retaliation. Jean Bernard, Catholic Bishop of Luxembourg, who was detained at Dachau, later wrote: “The detained priests trembled every time news reached us of some protest by a religious authority, but particularly by the Vatican. We all had the impression that our warders made us atone heavily for the fury these protest evoke (on them.)” (6)

Fr. Robert A.Graham, S.J., has said that: “it may surprise the contemporary generation to learn that the local Jewish communities and the world Jewish bodies did not, for the most part, urge the Pope to speak out. Their objective was far more concrete and down-to-earth… Appeals to world opinion, high-sounding though it may appear, would have seemed cheap and trivial gestures to those engaged in rescue work…The need to refrain from provocative public statements at such a delicate moments was fully recognized in Jewish circles.” (7)

When an Italian priest, Fr. Scavizzi, a chaplain on a military train travelling through Poland, told the Pope of the conditions in the camps, especially of the Jews, the Holy Father broke down and wept. Bitterly, Pius XII confided to him: “After many tears and many prayers I have judged that a protest of mine not only would fail to help anyone, but would create even more fury against the Jews, multiplying acts of cruelty. Perhaps my solemn protest would have earned me praise from the civilized world, but it would also have brought more implacable persecution of the Jews… I love the Jews.” (8)

With the existing proven facts, can in all consciousness, truly be said that Pope Pius XII remained silent throughout WWII while millions of Jews and gentiles were exterminated? I do not think so. The Pope was not silent during WWII, he was not even neutral-he was on the Allies’ side.


19 posted on 02/13/2015 8:40:20 AM PST by Dqban22 (Hpo<p> http://i.imgur.com/26RbAPxjpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tiki

New York Times praises Pius XII’s Christmas Messages in 1941 and 1942

On Christmas Day 1941, the editorial of the New York Times, commenting on Pius XII’s Christmas Message, said: “The voice of Pius XII is a lonely voice in the silence and darkness enveloping Europe this Christmas…as we realize that he is about the only ruler left on the Continent of Europe who dares to raise his voice at all…In calling for a ‘real new order’ based on ‘liberty, justice and love,’ to be attained only by a ‘return to social and international principles capable of creating a barrier against the abuse of liberty and the abuse of power”. “The Pope,” said the NYT, “put himself squarely against Hitlerism, he left no doubt that the Nazi aims are also irreconcilable with his own conception of a Christian peace.”

On Christmas Day 1942, the New York Times editorialized on Pius XII’s Christmas Message and again praised the Pope for his moral leadership. “This Christmas,” said de NYT, “more than ever he (Pius XII) is a lonely voice crying out of the silence of a continent. The Pulpit whence he speaks is more than ever like the rock on which the Church was founded, a tiny island lashed and surrounded by a sea of war… (Pius XII) condemns as heresy the new form of national state which subordinates every thing to itself, he declared that whoever wants peace must protect against ‘arbitrary attacks’ the ‘juridical safety of individuals. The Pope assailed the violent occupation of territory, the exile and persecution of human beings for no other reason than race or political opinion.” The address also contained the first formal enunciation of human rights made by a Pope.

Pope Pius XII, said the NYT, “expresses as passionately as any leader on our side of the war aims of the struggle for freedom when he says that those who aim at building a new world order must fight for free choice of government and religious order. They must refuse that the state should make of individuals a herd of whom the state disposes as if they were a lifeless thing.”

The British Ambassador to the Vatican says that the Pope was the most warmly humane, kindly, sympathetic, and saintly character he had known

D’Arcy Osborne, the Protestant Minister of Britain to the Vatican wrote of Pope Pius XII: as “the most warmly humane, kindly, generous, sympathetic, and incidentally saintly, character who has been my privilege to meet in the course of a long life.” (26)

Charles de Gaulle described the Pope as pious and compassionate

Charles de Gaulle, after an audience with the Pope on June 30, 1944, declared: “The Holy Father receives me. Beneath the kindly welcome and the simplicity of his language, I am gripped by the sharpness and power of his thought. Pius XII judges everything from a viewpoint superior to that of men…the supernatural burden, which is laid on him alone in all the world, weighs, one feels, on his soul, but he carries it without flinching, certain of his goal, sure of his way…Pious, compassionate, political in the highest meaning these words can have, thus this pontiff and sovereign appears to me, through the respect which he inspires in me.” (27)

On October 12, 1945, Leo Kubwitsky, on behalf of the World Jewish Congress made a gift of 2 million lire (the equivalent of over one million dollars at present value) to the Vatican as a token of gratitude. Pius XII decided that the sum should go exclusively to needy people of Jewish origin. Jews who had first hand knowledge, or participated in the extraordinary efforts of Pius XII and the Catholic Church in saving Jewish lives during this most tragic period, were not short in publicly expressing their profound gratitude while this great Pope was still alive.

Moshe Sharett, Israel’s first Foreign Minister, (and later the second Prime of Minister), met Pius XII in 1945 and said later: “I told him that my first duty was to thank him, and through him, the Catholic Church, on behalf of the Jewish people, for all they had done in various countries to rescue Jews, to save children and Jews in general.”

THE WHOLE TRUTH MUST PREVAIL.


20 posted on 02/13/2015 8:45:04 AM PST by Dqban22 (Hpo<p> http://i.imgur.com/26RbAPxjpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson