You can give that nonsense a break. Six of the seven churches addressed in Revelation has already gone off track. Now you want us to appeal to someone over 200 years later? What kind of nonsense is that?
>>The question, however, is why you, doubting the words of Jesus Christ, have declared this a sin.<<
I don't doubt the words of Jesus. He said His words were spirit. It was against the law to eat blood and Jesus was obligated to follow all laws or He would have been sinning. That would have rendered Him incapable of being the sinless sacrifice.
Six of the seven churches addressed in Revelation has already gone off track. Now you want us to appeal to someone over 200 years later? What kind of nonsense is that?Not one of the churches addressed in Revelation was admonished for misconstruing Christ's words in John 6 to eat his flesh and drink his blood. They are irrelevant to the present discussion.