I was just pointing out that there have always been folks who interpreted the events in Revelation as future events, even going back as far as 160 AD. It’s not a new interpretation, and just because some have disagreed with the future events position, it doesn’t invalidate the position.
I agree. We just finished studying a book I highly recommend: Steve Greggs’s, “Revelation: Four Views, a Parallel Commentary”. Each view is presented side by side and fully explained. And each view holds certain passage in a better light than any other. The real danger, in my view, is getting locked in too early - it will all become very clear in the fullness of time.
Many thanks for the clarification; I wasn’t sure of your position about the timing of the “great tribulation” mentioned in Revelations.