[vladimir998]

“It’s not my fault if you have a mistaken understanding of what “Sola Scriptura” means.”

I had no mistaken notion at all. Your waffle is your dodge. It is not my misunderstanding.

“That’s what happens when you go to Catholic blogs to find out about Protestant beliefs.”

I’ve never done that. I simply read works by Mathison, King, Sproul, et al. a number of years ago. The lengths they went to in order to prop up a false 16th century doctrine that never once appears in scripture was amazing. Their works helped me realize how Protestant anti-Catholics wallow in mendacity and don’t even realize it. But of course they have to:

“To Protestantism False Witness is the principle of propagation. … Taking things as they are, and judging of them by the long run, one may securely say, that the anti-Catholic Tradition could not be kept alive, would die of exhaustion, without a continual supply of fable.” (John Henry Newman, Lecture 4. True Testimony Insufficient for the Protestant View)

[Boogieman]

“I had no mistaken notion at all.”

Sure, you just misapply the phrase on purpose then?

[Iscool]

“To Protestantism False Witness is the principle of propagation. … Taking things as they are, and judging of them by the long run, one may securely say, that the anti-Catholic Tradition could not be kept alive, would die of exhaustion, without a continual supply of fable.” (John Henry Newman, Lecture 4. True Testimony Insufficient for the Protestant View)

Isn't this the guy whose wife and bed mate was a man??? You think God would grant him any knowledge or wisdom???