“So you admit it’s abuse?”
Not even close. It’s not abusive and it’s not a “constant barrage”. Remember, I posted 9 posts to a total of 4 people. You’re posting proportionately as much as I am at the very least. Are your posts a constant barrage? Are your posts abusive?
“But that’s not the point is it, it’s about intellectual and spiritual integrity.”
Agreeing with anti-Catholics when they are in the wrong is not intellectual or spiritual integrity.
“I didn’t post that CCC841 was wrong to treat fellow freepers like things or stroke my own ego, I wrote it because I believe I am correct.”
But you’re not.
“Don’t you know what the answer to this one is?”
No, not when you are agreeing with those (anti-Catholics) who openly attack the Christ’s Church. I have no problem agreeing with anyone when they say there are Catholics who are corrupt, or liberals, or some priests are pedophiles or ephebophiles. I see no reason, however, to agree with them when they are clearly in the wrong, not open to reason, and also (repeatedly) lie, distort, misrepresent, etc.
“Are you saying you disagree with it then?”
Anti-Catholics, yes. Scripture, no. The problem is that you don’t seem to understand that the truth is charity.
“I already answered why it was posted to my profile page.”
Do you agree with it then or not. That you have no answered. You don’t have to. All you really need to do is ask God to give you wisdom.
“Are you saying you disagree with it then?”
Anti-Catholics, yes. Scripture, no. The problem is that you don’t seem to understand that the truth is charity.
You quoted yourself and then answered as if I had asked the question. Regardless, "truth" spat out with venom isn't the truth, it's venom.