Todd: If Cruz Can Win Evangelical Vote, He Has a Shot

Breitbart TV ^ | March 28, 2015 | Ian Hanchett

[okie01]

And to be honest, I have reservations about another President with basically zero executive experience.

Obama's problem is a lack of executive experience, huh?

[FreeReign]

Obama's problem is a lack of executive experience, huh?

Sure.

If Obama had been a governor, he would be pro American, pro liberty and pro Constitution.

LOL.

Obama's problem of course is that he hates America, hates the Constitution and hates liberty.

And despite his lack of executive experience he has been very successful in "transforming" America into a tyranny.

[SoConPubbie]

You’ve been added to the Ted Cruz Ping List!

[American Constitutionalist]

America loves a underdog story.

[rabidralph]

LOL!

[American Constitutionalist]

Hillary, the unprincipled lot has no crutch to lean on, no wait, her crutch is the sexism card....

Old Crutches Scankle Cancles

[American Constitutionalist]

Hey ! That’s sexist “ mop the floor “ with the old scank...... Sarcasm.

That’s Hillary’s crutch, to use the sexism card....

I believe the public is growing weary of the race card usage and the bogus sexism card usage.

[CPT Clay]

I didn’t stay home because Mitt was on the ballot. I just skipped right by his name.

Thanks

[b4its2late]

Thanks!

[MikefromOhio]

Obama's problem is a lack of executive experience, huh? Like I said initially - I know it won't be a popular take on FR. I'm totally ok with it, nor do I seek or care about having FR's approval.

But to answer your question - Obama has MANY problems, most of them being that he's a far left politician with no practical experience of any type. And that lack of experience INCLUDES not having any executive experience. Hillary has the same issue.

The last thing the conservatives need is to put up an ideologue who has the same lack of experience. I could (and mostly do) agree with Cruz on everything he believes in, but he does seem to lack a certain element that all "firebrands" lack and people like Reagan had and that element is having lead a government and "done it" in government before...

I now return you to your regularly scheduled political tone-deafness....

[MikefromOhio]

Same was thought about RR... At least by GOPe’s. Oh and ‘northern libs’

Big difference about Reagan - he HAD been a governor with actual experience. That's a big criteria (at least for me, and it used to be on FR until Cruz became the flavor of the month).....

[okie01]

Obama has MANY problems, most of them being that he's a far left politician with no practical experience of any type.

Obama has one problem: He's a radical anti-American with, at the least, Communist and Muslim sympathies. The fact that he has no executive experience is totally incidental. Indeed, he has no meaningful experience whatsoever.

But it is his beliefs that make him who he is and direct what he does.

[MikefromOhio]

Obama has one problem: He's a radical anti-American with, at the least, Communist and Muslim sympathies. The fact that he has no executive experience is totally incidental. Indeed, he has no meaningful experience whatsoever.

I have always has a problem with the bolded part of your statement.

Communists are never religious. Ever. And Muslims are relatively fervent anti-Communists historically. Since we know Obama was a socialist/communist until he found out that he could run as a Democrat and get a pass, he was a fervent Socialist party member.

It doesn't excuse anything, I just don't think his policies are that of an Islamic sympathizer as much as a inept politician who is still trying to separate himself from his predecessor by sucking up to the same elements that GW Bush called "evil"....

And again I realize this won't be the most popular position on FR, and I still don't care.