Posted on 03/31/2015 9:18:37 PM PDT by NYer
So, some people are screwing up the principle upon which our entire civilization and form of government is premised and organized, and your solution is to dispense with the principle.
Mao’s reign of terror was sane compared to the New America. Maoism was based on economics. Even he didn’t push “gay rights.”
We do a disservice to religious freedom using the word tolerant and its variations. To do so lets the Left frame the debate.
Exactly right!!
Political Correctness was developed by the Communists after the Russian Revolution to CONTROL THE NARRATIVE.
I’ve also been saying that for years.
Thanks for the ping to this anti-Christian crusade.
People can be married apart from government’s attempts to regulate and approve their action. For example, should some people get shipwrecked on a deserted island in the Pacific, they could enter into a marriage all by themselves, without any contact whatsoever with any government.
That is the history of marriage up until progressives wanted to intrude upon it for the purposes of eugenics. It is time to remove that usurped power from government and return government to merely recording and recognizing the marriages that people notify it of.
Nobody said they couldn't.
For example, should some people get shipwrecked on a deserted island in the Pacific, they could enter into a marriage all by themselves, without any contact whatsoever with any government.
Of course they could. There are all sorts of things people can do in a state of nature.
But when they enter into a society and enjoy the benefits of that society they have certain responsibilities to that society.
Wise folks like John Locke and Samuel Adams spelled all of this out in great detail centuries ago, forming the premises of this great free republic.
Back in the late 60s, an Italian immigrant friend came to visit. In Italy, he had received a "classical" education, where they study all aspects of the history, language, and culture of an ancient civilization. He studied Ancient Rome and Greece. After surveying the American culture at that time (this was the early period of American feminism with Gloria Steinem and Bella Abzug), he pointed to both Roman and Greek history. He claimed that throughout history, once women rose to power, they were soon followed by a rise in the homosexual movement, after which the culture collapsed under the burden of legislation.
He pointed to those feminists and predicted that in my lifetime, I would witness the collapse of the US. I bristled at the notion, then laughed. It seemed so absurd and far fetched. All they were asking for was "equal pay for equal work". I stopped laughing around the year 2000 as what he predicted began to unfold before my eyes.
You may find this to be relevant and quite enlightening.
I’m sorry for being dumb, but what was that red thing in 48? Thank you!
It was an indication of the end of the "Era of Tolerance" and a beginning of the "Era of Celebration of Buggery - Or Else".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.