**Zuriel’s analysis is a riot. First it was about lack of belief by Catholics in the literal six day creation**
I haven’t been involved in the creation debate for a year or so.
**then it was because the devil allows large churches and basilicas to be built, forgetting how the monumental Temple of Solomon was built to house the Ark of the Convent**
I didn’t forget, I just didn’t include it in a list of places of worship inspired by the devil.
Still no answers from you, though, on what lines you think the devil WON”T cross.
**Now Zuriel is onto another riddle. She wants to know whether the Eucharist “wears out”? Is this the level of serious inquiry or what?**
Your church claims it to be necessary for eternal life. Does one dose get the job done? 10? 100? 1,000?, 1,000,000?
If one doesn’t get the job done,....then....why...not?
You claim you are eating God, then why the need to repeat? How much eating of God is sufficient for eternal life?
How about REALLY answering for a change, instead of acting like a (biased) debate observer?
**Now Zuriel is onto another riddle. She wants**
Just how hard do you work at research? A simple look at my home page will tell you I’m a ‘he’. I have no clue about you.
>>I haven’t been involved in the creation debate for a year or so.<<
I think that was me you're discussing. According to the ccc catholics view the Genesis account as "symbolic"....not a literal creation.
If you don't get the beginning right, you're bound to get a lot of the rest wrong.