Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: af_vet_1981
I see a high correlation, and hypocrisy, in allowing "personal saviour" and disallowing "mother of God."

Ok, let's start with the above. Show me where I indicated using the term 'personal savior' is Biblical? I did not. I explained several times that the scriptures do not use this term. That looking at psalms, prayers and personal testimony we do see the relationship between God and man personal.

That's what I put forth. But you continue to parrot the same line.

212 posted on 04/09/2015 1:00:50 PM PDT by redleghunter (1 Peter 1:3-5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]


To: redleghunter
I see a high correlation, and hypocrisy, in allowing "personal saviour" and disallowing "mother of God."

Ok, let's start with the above. Show me where I indicated using the term 'personal savior' is Biblical? I did not. I explained several times that the scriptures do not use this term. That looking at psalms, prayers and personal testimony we do see the relationship between God and man personal.

Are you explaining that "personal saviour" is unscriptural and therefore disallowed, or that even though it is not in scripture, it is scriptural and allowed ?

I have already demonstrated from Isaiah and Matthew many times that Mary is the mother of "God with us." There is no credible reason to allow "personal saviour" and disallow "mother of God."

214 posted on 04/09/2015 2:33:21 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson