His statement that were he to start a church he would “love to have women priests” is objectively blasphemous, since it is an implied criticism of Christ.
Posted on 04/15/2015 7:05:52 PM PDT by ebb tide
At the Italian site Nuova Bussola, we find the observations of Oscar Card. Rodriguez Maradiaga about the possibility of Communion for the divorced and remarried.
Impossible? “No!”, says the Cardinal.
And if the upcoming Synod rejects the proposal, the Kasperite Solution, hey!… maybe there could be a third synod on the question!
And His Eminence seems to be putting a great deal of stock in polls.
I’m in my car in a parking lot, so I can’t do the translation at the time of this posting.
In tutto il mondo, aggiunge Maradiaga, “i sondaggi dicono che la gente non vuole sposarsi, né in Chiesa, né civilmente, e il Vangelo della famiglia deve essere annunciato, perchè è il progetto di Dio e deve essere sommamente considerato dalla Chiesa”. Il problema “non è, come alcuni media hanno detto, sulla possibilità dei divorziati risposati di accedere all’eucaristia, no, ci sono cose molto più profonde e che devono essere affrontate nel Sinodo”. Secondo il Card. Maradiaga il medoto del sinodo, che sarebbe quello di “vedere, giudicare e attuare”, potrebbe anche portare alla convocazione di una terza tappa. “Non sappiamo se alla fine del sinodo di ottobre si chiuderà il processo [sinodale], o se il Papa ne convocherà un terzo, potrebbe essere, perchè si tratta di cose molto importanti…”
Ongoing synods until the desired result is obtained?
Impossible? “No!”, says the Cardinal.
Just like leftists, keep trying until you win and then declare the matter closed for good.
Maradiaga, of course, was hand-picked by Francis to be a member of the pope’s Gang o’ Nine. And despite Maradiaga’s earlier advocacies for Holy Communion for unrepentant adulterers, he remains a member of the Gang. As do the heretics: Sean O’Malley and Reinhard Marx.
Please provide evidence of heresy of Cardinal O’Malley.
Not a very supportive statement of Church teaching, but not heresy, since O’Malley didn’t found the Church, thank goodness.
This is how Arius got into trouble.
This posts confuses me.
Cardinal O’Malley is called a heretic. I ask for evidence. I was sent a link to an article where O’Malley said if he had founded the Church, he would have provided for female priests. My response states Cardinal O’Malley’s statement is not supportive of or helpful to Catholic teaching, but it is not heretical, since he is not calling for women’s ordination, just saying if he were Jesus, he wouldn’t have done what Jesus did.
Ah, OK I get your point now. I guess it would have helped if I actually read through the previous posts....lol. Sorry.
Having said that, Modernist heretics are really good at not coming right out and saying what they really mean. The fact that he is participating in a non-Catholic ceremony (which was always condemned by the Catholic Church) is more evidence that he is a heretic.
His statement that were he to start a church he would “love to have women priests” is objectively blasphemous, since it is an implied criticism of Christ.
Bingo.
Yes, thank you. I’m very familiar with this Catholic teaching. Unfortunately, most Catholics are not and most of the hierarchy pretend it’s old news.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.