Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/04/2015 6:28:34 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; CynicalBear; daniel1212; Gamecock; HossB86; Iscool; ...

Ping


2 posted on 06/04/2015 6:29:30 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7

In other words, they lied.


4 posted on 06/04/2015 6:36:21 AM PDT by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7
In before the Catholics. 😆
5 posted on 06/04/2015 6:44:39 AM PDT by Mark17 (Through all my days, and then in Heaven above, my song will silence never, I'll worship Him forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7

Source link is not working.


6 posted on 06/04/2015 7:21:25 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7

A former Catholic —

now a member of Southwood Presbyterian Church (PCA).

Move on, folks.


7 posted on 06/04/2015 7:25:27 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7
“This law is invariable, so much so that Richard of St. Laurence felt authorized to place on the lips of Our Lord the following words, ‘No one can come to Me unless My Mother draws him to Me.'” (Eymard, 207)

“The Scripture account of the conversion of the penitent thief requires some tradition to clear it up. …Now it is an ancient tradition that the penitent thief was on the right hand of the Cross; and it seems likely that Mary, if she moved about, would yet stand most upon that side, as S. John would feel it the place of honour, and yield it to her. S. Ephrem attributes the conversion of the thief to her intercession.” (Livius, 299)

so 'glad' Richard of St. Laurence felt 'authorized' to speak for our Lord Jesus Christ.

12 posted on 06/04/2015 8:47:27 AM PDT by redleghunter (1 Peter 1:3-5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7

HERESY!!

“Contenson places on the dying lips of Jesus these merciful words: ‘0 men, be hold your Mother! My Wounds are the sources of grace, but their streams, their currents, are spread abroad only by the channel of Mary.'” (Eymard, 204)

13 posted on 06/04/2015 9:49:07 AM PDT by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7
In every case, the belief came first, and the evidence followed.

This is true of most religious error, whether in Rome or anywhere else.

Always stick with God's Word, and examine everything in the Light of His Truth. If you don't, just like Eve, God's Word gets embellished, misquoted, and eventually ignored. The moment you exalt the reasoning of some man or theologian above God's Truth, you are in trouble. The article clearly points out the danger of the opinions of men, and how they quickly depart from the Truth. With just a few moments of careful study of God's Word, all the error above would have been quickly abandoned. A vigilant body of Believers who knew God's Word should have quickly corrected such errors. Instead, they were allowed to fester and grow, leading folks further away from the Truth. Now, we also have to contend with Arguments From Age, since Kermit the Hermit wrote something in the 6th century that was not properly disputed and corrected, it is now seen by the religious to be equal or superior to Scripture!

God gave us His Word and the Holy Spirit for a reason - so that you would know His Truth, and the Truth sets you free from the father of lies.

19 posted on 06/04/2015 10:32:02 AM PDT by Kandy Atz ("Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want for bread.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7
Hey Mom.....where'd your "Washington Post" thread go??

Wait......I know........I bet them Catholics got it pulled!!

You exposed the great conspiracy.......ROFLOL!!

22 posted on 06/04/2015 10:40:07 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7
This post draws from two sources—Fr. Eymard’s Month of Our Lady of the Blessed Sacrament (1903), and Thomas Livius’ The Blessed Virgin in the Fathers of the First Six Centuries (1893)—both of which attempt to show support for Roman Catholic doctrines of Mary.

In his usual pattern of error, Kauffman takes two rather florid late-Victorian pieces of devotional literature and pretends that Catholics elevate them to the status of Sacred Tradition. Uh, no, sorry, Timmy, no more so than e.g., Spurgeon's sermons are "sacred tradition" for Protestants.

30 posted on 06/04/2015 12:48:59 PM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7

Ayup. Right on schedule... the anti-Catholic express.

I don’t suppose you’ve found the Scripture which teaches “sola Scriptura” yet, have you?


53 posted on 06/05/2015 9:27:26 AM PDT by paladinan (Rule #1: There is a God. Rule #2: It isn't you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7

Sure a LOT of guessin’, speculatin’ and imaginin’ going on here!


77 posted on 06/06/2015 3:56:24 AM PDT by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson