Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN

“I owe YOU no apology.”

Really? Let’s see. You went on:

“I wrote precisely what I wrote the first time meaning just what I meant the first time.”

That means you wrote something that is categorically untrue. I do not worship any institution. For that alone there should be an apology from you for you said something about me that is ABSOLUTELY UNTRUE.

Then you wrote:

“I added the IN to salve your petulance.”

So you consider it petulant for a man to say, “I do not worship any institution” in reply to a false accusation about worshiping an institution? That would mean, if I falsely accused you of worshiping your pastor, or your Bible, or your sect, or your latest car, or your whatever, anything at all, and you flatly denied that you did so it would a petulant comment on your part. Do you even remotely comprehend the absurdity of what you’re saying? Seriously think about what you’re saying for a moment. If anyone here, anyone at all, simply says he doesn’t worship something you falsely accuse them of worshiping you’re saying that person is being petulant. The absurdity of that sort of point of view is astounding.

“I will not apologize for calling your religion an institution,”

You don’t have to. What you should apologize for is falsely saying I WORSHIP an institution when I do not.

“nor will I apologize for identifying the thing you worship an institution.”

The Trinity is not an institution and the Trinity is all I have ever worshiped.

“And still you will not answer the question posed because it exposes something you are petrified of seeing.”

No, I choose not to answer your question because no man who says something so false as you did and refuses to offer even the simplest of apologies has any automatic right to my time in any way he wishes. And the one who must be afraid is the one who can’t simply man up and apologize for stating a falsehood about another man.


132 posted on 06/28/2015 11:17:35 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: vladimir998
A devout catholic owns the heresies and the condemnation deserved for them, by their won cowardice to confront them in the institution WHERE you worship the catholic god, the god who demands you believe you drink his blood.

catholics can claim they worship the Trinity and fawn over the administrations of an institution claiming authority they were never issued, but God sees the inward parts. The Indulgences are the open proof of an heretical religion trying to appear Christian. But at its heart it serves the evil one with every insistence. And, BTW, when the man of sin is revealed, he too will have a trinity to offer to catholics. It won't make it magically be valid though ...

133 posted on 06/28/2015 11:24:21 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

To: vladimir998

Run vlad run, the Hound of Heaven is after you.


134 posted on 06/28/2015 11:29:31 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson