Posted on 02/01/2016 4:05:40 PM PST by NYer
Making the thread about another poster started in post #9 where you accused another poster of being drunk.
But that is her MO when called on her use of bias against those not part of her belief system.
Yes I know you were clever and posted it as a question.
But when a slur like yours is posted, others will go outside the guidelines with you and the thread enters into the chaotic zone.
Salvation of course didn't go to the root of the problem, but instead falsely accused another poster of making the thread about a member.
I brought this to her attention, but received no answer or explanation as to why she wasn't accurate in her research before slamming the wrong poster with a false accusation
She rarely ever answers a reply that calls her out on her biased posts.
You also doubled down on your "are you a drunk" question. I guess saying it once wasn't enough.
You have been successful in diverting the thread to you instead of the actual issues of the thread.
It appears you did not have debate ammo to use to answer a completely legitimate post, therefore the poster must be "drunk?"
Congrats on not having debate on the issue of Catholics worshiping the false god of Islam as proclaimed by the highest authority of the Catholic Church at this time.
Mission accomplished, now lets see if the thread is pulled and if any more Christians are banned for calling you out for your use of diversionary tactic instead of honest reasoned debate.
Proverbs 1:22-26Elsie, thanks for the tagline!
"How long, O naive ones, will you love being simple-minded? And scoffers delight themselves in scoffing And fools hate knowledge?
I put a message for you at the bottom of my last post on this thread.
Highlight the area below my text to see it.
Everyone else, Don’t look!
I have other things to do. Don’t always get back to threads.
If you are posting on a thread you should not post something that is not accurate.
It is you responsibility to make it right isn’t it?
That is a basic Christian principle.
Thanks for the reply.
Earlier today you posted:
“I’m not going to play your game, vladi.”
Stop posting to me.
Earlier today you posted:
“I’m not going to play your game, vladi.”
Stop posting to me. It isn’t hard. Just stop posting to me.
“Making the thread about another poster started in post #9 where you accused another poster of being drunk.”
Now explain why to me how it is not hypocrisy for others to do the same thing while complaining I did it earlier. Can you do that?
“Mission accomplished, now lets see if the thread is pulled and if any more Christians are banned for calling you out for your use of diversionary tactic instead of honest reasoned debate.”
There was no chance of “honest reasoned debate” precisely because of the content of the comment I responded to. That’s why I responded exactly as I did.
I explained that in my last post to you.
Read it slower.
The comment was:
According to Francis, Catholics and Muslims worship the same God.Did you miss that when it was proclaimed?
The other two statements were metaphorical taken from the sentence quoted.
Surely you could find some words to respond to the post.
Or do you wish to hide the facts about Muslims and Catholics worshiping the same "God?"
So it was attributed to Francis, big deal.
I believe he may have commented on it, I don't know.
But here it is from Catholic history;
The Church's relationship with Muslims. The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place among whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind's judge on the last day (Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraph 841, quoting Lumen Gentium 16, November 21, 1964).
“The comment was:”
Nope.
The comment had THREE SENTENCES. You posted one. Disagree all you want, but be honest. Try.
“I explained that in my last post to you.”
No you did not.
“Read it slower.”
Write it better.
Bingo.
That's the meat of the issue which was being deceitfully avoided.
Instead, the flaws were said to be in some critic here --- accused of drunkenness.
Different day, same shoot-the-messenger game playing. Right in the middle of that sick game, another one of them has the nerve to lecture about making false accusations.
These people are truly, spiritually ill. A den of vipers. It's like I'm being bitten by serpents each time I encounter their words...
No thanks.
You don't want a response, then , and follow your own advice, shut up, and stop posting to me.
But you want a response, don't you? You keep coming back for more, just can't leave it alone...
You've burned the privileged of being treated decently, and with respect, for having so long taken pains to deny affording that to others.
Understand? And that's why my own comments were not otherwise deleted, even though they bent and broke the rules (in responding to your own serial/habitual bending and breaking of the forum rules).
I'm not the only one who has had their fill of "it" from you.
You need to read the whole post not just the part you wish to comment upon.
Your deceptiveness and apparent inability to converse in a mature manner is duly noted.
The continuity and clarity of my post to you should not be that difficult for a clear mind to understand
“Be honest”
The irony is that it is I that has been honest
The Pee Wee Herman tactic doesn’t work on me
The thread took a nasty turn early on with an accusation of a personal nature
Yes that is ignored and the poster is defended by his belief mates
Same ol’ same ol’
Very pretty!
This has been dealt with before...
Acts 2:13-15
13 Some, however, made fun of them and said, "They have had too much wine."
14 Then Peter stood up with the Eleven, raised his voice and addressed the crowd: "Fellow Jews and all of you who live in Jerusalem, let me explain this to you; listen carefully to what I say. 15 These people are not drunk, as you suppose. It's only nine in the morning!
To hear it told; there ARE no Anti-Prot threads on FR.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.