Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ousted Pastor of S.C. Megachurch has had Close Ties to Elevation’s Furtick
The Charlotte Observer ^ | July 12, 2016 | Tim Funk and Rick Rothacker

Posted on 07/13/2016 8:25:59 AM PDT by Cecily

A pastor ousted by his megachurch in South Carolina over problems that included alcohol use has been a close friend of Elevation Church pastor Steven Furtick and has served on the board of overseers at the Charlotte church.

As recently as 2014, Perry Noble – removed July 1 by the board at NewSpring Church in Anderson, S.C. – was described as the longest serving member of the Elevation board. Elevation officials did not respond Tuesday to requests for comment on whether he was still on the board.

Elevation, started in 2006, is one of the fastest growing evangelical churches in America, and it draws about 20,000 people to services every weekend at its 10 locations in and around Charlotte.

A 2014 issue of a magazine published for Elevation’s members called Noble “one of Pastor Steven’s closest friends,” referring to Furtick.

(Excerpt) Read more at charlotteobserver.com ...


TOPICS: Current Events
KEYWORDS: anderson; charlotte; christian; christianity; elevation; elevationchurch; furtick; guiltbyassociation; megachurch; smear; southcarolina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: AppyPappy

Well then Jesus had the same problem.


21 posted on 07/13/2016 10:45:59 AM PDT by Gamecock (There is always one more idiot than you counted on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

I don’t recall Jesus getting drunk. He did manufacture alcohol which would have banished him from SBC pulpits.


22 posted on 07/13/2016 10:47:22 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

He didn’t get drunk.

He did drink.


23 posted on 07/13/2016 10:50:43 AM PDT by Gamecock (There is always one more idiot than you counted on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Yet not the same thing. The SBC has always been Pharisaical about drinking but this guy must have really stepped in it.


24 posted on 07/13/2016 10:58:58 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

It is affiliated with the SBC, although the SBC has called them out for the way they operate.


25 posted on 07/13/2016 11:18:08 AM PDT by burghguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: burghguy

Right. I think it’s one thing to say, “The pastor appears to be narcissistic and greedy,” and something else to say that a congregation of a major American denomination is a “cult.”


26 posted on 07/13/2016 11:19:47 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Tell 'em that God's gonna cut 'em down." ~Johnny Cash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Well, seems we have a cult member in our midst. These churches like Elevation and New Spring, who elevate the worship of their pastor above worship of Christ, are criticized by more than just me. You still haven’t addressed the issue of the pastor living in a 17,000 sq, ft, home, which costs $1.7 million. Who checks Elevation’s books? Not their board, as none of them are church members. These mega- churches would be fine if controlled by their congregations, but they are controlled by the charismatic pastors who set up boards of like-minded charismatic pastors to “control” the church. I don’t see much difference in this group than the followers of Jim Jones, except for the brand of Kool-aid they consume.


27 posted on 07/13/2016 11:31:06 AM PDT by burghguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: burghguy
Well, seems we have a cult member in our midst.

Really? Who?

You seem to think that I'm saying I support Elevation's business arrangements and approve of Rev. Furtick's lifestyle. Neither of those is true, to the extent I'm aware of any of it. I simply think there's a lot more to a "cult" than this.

28 posted on 07/13/2016 11:36:36 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Tell 'em that God's gonna cut 'em down." ~Johnny Cash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: burghguy; Tax-chick
These mega- churches would be fine if controlled by their congregations

I agree. But I don't agree with the comparison to Jim Jones, who I'm sure did not have oversight from any outside pastors.

And while we can question what kind of oversight they have, the fact remains that this pastor was removed from his post by this board for having personal problems that interfere with his ability to lead.

So obviously they do have that authority.

Some mega-church pastors supplement their income by selling books; some so successfully that they do not accept a salary from the church. I don't know what the case is here.

I am used to the church model in which a local board of elders hire and fire the preacher, and set the budget and salary. But then again, such a model is biased toward a very stable church body. I can see that a board consisting of mega-pastors would be biased toward fast growth. Its a different mentality. A church, a pastor, that determines to reach the lost by the thousands will think differently than one that is content to watching baptisms and funerals balancing one another out.

There are preachers who think in terms of reaching, not hundreds or thousands, but millions. They think differently, and would require a board of overseers who are on the same page.

29 posted on 07/13/2016 3:20:52 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: marron

Very interesting observations, marron. Your point about a different goal for the church, so to speak, requiring a different governance structure is quite sensible.


30 posted on 07/13/2016 5:17:08 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("Tell 'em that God's gonna cut 'em down." ~Johnny Cash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: marron
But I don't agree with the comparison to Jim Jones, who I'm sure did not have oversight from any outside pastors.

Considering that Jim Jones was a Marxist I am sure he had no pastoral oversight either.

Although Marxism is a religion dressed up as a political philosophy.

Perhaps Leonid Brezhnev could have given him some tips.

31 posted on 07/13/2016 5:28:58 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Yo, Gamecock,
I signed in tonight to tell you to remove me from your ping lists although I enjoy your articles, because I don’t come here too often anymore. However, I am “too new” to use this feature evidently, according to the error message I received. I’ve been here for a while, but if that’s the way it is, so be it.
So thank you for everything and GO COCKS!


32 posted on 08/09/2016 8:15:49 PM PDT by Chong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson