Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: vladimir998
Again, you can't even come up with your own material.

And again, for the last time, your problem, among many, is with the website and its rendering of the text in question.

The term Roman Catholic was in existence well before the Reformation. You just can't admit it.

112 posted on 10/14/2017 7:31:53 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: ealgeone

“Again, you can’t even come up with your own material.”

The truth is enough.

“And again, for the last time, your problem, among many, is with the website and its rendering of the text in question.”

And, again, and not for the last time probably, I don’t even know what the website it. All that mattered was that you posted quotes that said one thing and you falsely claimed they said another. At that point the website is irrelevant. You torpedoed your own efforts by posting quotes that in no way said what you claimed they said.

“The term Roman Catholic was in existence well before the Reformation. You just can’t admit it.”

The term “Roman Catholics” WAS NOT - just as lexicographers - who were Protestants - admitted in the OED.

Again, you can’t just say a Latin phrase from the 13th century or the 11th century or elsewhere in the Middle Ages is somehow the same as a DIFFERENT term in English in the 16th century. That’s not how language works. That’s not how history works. It is how a Protestant drone would work, however, because he probably doesn’t care about facts.


115 posted on 10/14/2017 7:40:59 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson