Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-abortion college student argues for infanticide of 2-year-olds
LifeSite News ^ | January 5, 2018 | Dorothy Cummings McLean

Posted on 01/08/2018 7:42:55 AM PST by ebb tide

A University of Tennessee student has argued that two-year-old children have no right to life because they cannot communicate.

Students for Life of America have released a video interview of the unnamed student to illustrate the extreme positions taken by the pro-abortion movement.

In the short clip, the male student is asked what he thinks about the argument that children can be “aborted” until the age of two.

“I’ll buy that,” says the student although he proceeds to argue for the death of two-year olds, believing them to be incapable of communication.

“The fact of the matter is that without communication, we have no way of knowing if you’re sentient or not,” he says. “I mean, it’s no different than this tree. It’s alive, but is it sentient? I don’t know. I can’t communicate with it.”

He brushes off his interviewer’s, Brenna Lewis’s, observation that comparing a tree to a two-year-old child is “tough”.

“Can the two-year-old talk to me?” the student demands, rolling not only his eyes, but his head. “In some instances, I’m fairly certain that is. But generally speaking, the child still has in inability to communicate. And until we communicate that as such, at what point does sentience become an issue? We can’t really debate whether that is the situation or not.”

The student’s views echo those of Peter Singer, the Australian philosopher best known for advocating the infanticide of disabled children. In his 1979 work Practical Ethics, he wrote:

The fact that a being is a human being, in the sense of a member of the species Homo sapiens, is not relevant to the wrongness of killing it; it is, rather, characteristics like rationality, autonomy, and self-consciousness that make a difference. Infants lack these characteristics. Killing them, therefore, cannot be equated with killing normal human beings, or any other self-conscious beings.

More recently, Singer argued in the Scotsman newspaper that pre-rational human beings have no right to life. “We have no obligation to allow every being with the potential to become a rational being to realise that potential,” he wrote.

But what is particularly odd about the Tennessee student’s comparison of a two-year-old with a tree is that he seems to believe two year olds can’t communicate. Newborn babies learn very quickly that if they make certain noises, there are certain results: a yell brings food, comfort, companionship. By six months of age, children recognize the basic sounds of their language. Before they are a year old, they understand words for everyday items (e.g. “cracker” and “cup”) and may even respond to such commands as “Come here.” They may already have one or two words in their spoken repertoire---but children as young as nine months have been taught a form of sign language.

Of course, what is more to the point is that a healthy-looking young man studying at an American university can so coolly argue against the right of children to live, even children who have left their mothers’ wombs and are physically independent of their mother’s bodies, even if their survival still depends on maternal care. Whatever would his mother say?


TOPICS: Current Events; General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: abortion; infanticide; murder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: sipow

21 posted on 01/08/2018 9:24:31 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

OMG, that’s so sick.......and so funny.


22 posted on 01/08/2018 9:26:11 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Whenever I read this kind of nonsense I have to wonder if the person has ever even heard of God. These are either ignorant people or just hate God and relish defying His laws. Sad.


23 posted on 01/08/2018 9:28:27 AM PST by mc5cents (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Astoundingly stupid. This imbecile does not know anyone who is 2 yrs old or younger.
Speech develops around 18 months but comprehension is a much earlier skill. 1 yr old children of sign language parents are signing full conversations, well before their speech develops.
At 3 yrs old my father, whose parents were deaf, did not speak, even though he conversed full with his parents. An uncle visited him daily and talked with him. Within 2 months my father was conversing fluently in spoken language. He went on to become the voice for thousands of deaf people.


24 posted on 01/08/2018 10:16:45 AM PST by Louis Foxwell (Islam is Satans finest work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
The student’s views echo those of Peter Singer, the Australian philosopher best known for advocating the infanticide of disabled children.

Peter Singer's parents escaped Austria in 1938 after the Anschluss but his grandparents did not. I suspect this nihilist fool is OK with that too. If it was good enough for the German Jews, it's good enough for two year olds. What a disgusting schmuck.

25 posted on 01/08/2018 10:43:56 AM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
The unnamed student is unnamed to protect his parents who should've aborted him at age 2. 2 year olds can't communicate? Are you sure?

I believe liberals needs to be aborted then. This unnamed moron should be first...

26 posted on 01/08/2018 1:11:23 PM PST by Deplorable American1776 (Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is, too. :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

We can’t understand one animal (except for Lassie of course)....and yet libs go ballistic if the eggs of the sea turtle are crushed.


27 posted on 01/08/2018 3:14:02 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Life is a human right that is not negated by abilities on the part if the individual.


28 posted on 01/08/2018 5:22:41 PM PST by Marchmain (free exercise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson