Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Neverending Story (The Christian Chronicles)
Associated Press ^ | 3/24/01

Posted on 03/30/2002 7:53:37 PM PST by malakhi

The Neverending Story
An ongoing debate on Scripture, Tradition, History and Interpretation.


Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams

Previous Thread


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,681-2,7002,701-2,7202,721-2,740 ... 65,521-65,537 next last
To: Ard Ri
Of course your not offended, havoc. I didn`t insinuate that you were . I said that your attitude is offensive. You remind me of the pharasees who smugly went about their way convinced that they were right and the rest of the world was wrong. They also were convinced that they had God tucked away nice and neatly, and possessed Him all for themselves . Your sense of PRIDE is offensive to God . You offer YOUR interpretation of Scripture. I prefer to take the Authority of the Church , backed up by 2,000 years of Study and reflection . The Church is a LIVING Entity. And your giving your interpretation to a translated version of a translated version does not impress me in the slightest.

Wow, all those big words. You must feel threatened by me or something. I don't have God in a Box, I have his Word though - His mind on things written out over centuries by the inspiration of His Spirit. All you have is claims and stuff founded on the wrong foundation. I don't care if you're impressed with me. You're supposed to heed the word of God - His scriptures as it were. And you're responsible to check everything I say against scripture before accepting it at any rate. So don't whine to me about what you are or are not impressed about. You can't even accept proper foundation. Nor can you present proper foundation. Just hollow words and empty claims. I follow the methodology of the Apostles and on their methodology, you've offere nothing.

Your comparison of to the Pharisees is empty. It mistates there case as badly as I think I've seen. Just compare me to the Apostles. They didn't teach any of the spurious junk your side pushes - Lord knows they must be heretics for that alone by your standards.

2,701 posted on 04/09/2002 6:36:15 PM PDT by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2688 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
If contreception is immoral, why do catholics believe Mary and Joseph never had sex and remaind celibate? Why is it OK for them but not for the rest?

LOL Becky that is basically the same question I asked last night, and was called blasphemous for it by a RC. But nobody had an answer. Maybe they will try for you.

2,702 posted on 04/09/2002 6:37:15 PM PDT by Iowegian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2700 | View Replies]

To: nate4one;SoothingDave
What is the wise choice?

The wise choice is between your wife and you. The Lord will lead you to the right decision.

Dave doesn't give a damn about you. He is the RC Chief Pharisee. IOW It's none of his business.
2,703 posted on 04/09/2002 6:39:51 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2607 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp, nate4one
The pill causes early abortions. I'm putting any theological differences aside, and simply begging you, from one pro-life Christian to another, get her off the pill. See the link above for the medical journal article on the pill and abortions. Regardless of anything else I say that you don't agree with, please believe me on this.

Yeah Nate listen to this guy and you might see you wife die before your eyes, he knows nothing about you or your life, and what you have went through, trust him, hes got the verses to back it up.

BigMack

2,704 posted on 04/09/2002 6:40:56 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2697 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
I thought you agreed it was the Lord's job to choose His Saints. Can you direct me to the place where we find the Lord appointed Stephen to Sainthood?

The same place that I get the rest of my doctrine - the Church. I believe that the Lord continues to guide the Church; that the Church is a visible organization begun by the Apostles and traceable via Apostolic succession to a visible organization active in the world today; and that this organization is the Orthodox Church. If I wasn't convinced of these three facts, I wouldn't be an Orthodox Christian - personally, I doubt that I would be a Christian at all. My faith in God and in what I believe to be His Church are one and the same. I believe the Tradition of the Church is a unified whole, and that Scripture is only the written part of Tradition.

I know you don't accept any of this, and don't have any new evidence to offer you. But I believe it. Within the context of this belief, I believe that the Lord has continued to reveal His will to the Church and to guide the Church. The process by which the Church recognizes a saint is one and the same as the process by which the Church recognized Scripture. I don't think that the recognition of saints is any more a "work of men" than I think the recognition of Scripture was a "work of men."

On that note, God bless and good night.

2,705 posted on 04/09/2002 6:41:31 PM PDT by Wordsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2698 | View Replies]

To: Iowegian
NFP has effective rates of approximately 95% to 99%. Many sources that make money off selling abortifacient contraceptives will try to tell us otherwise, but WHO studies have proven the effective rates.

NFP is morally neutral itself. Its like the difference between bulimia and dieting to lose weight. Both achieve the same goal. But with one the food is partaken and purged, with the other its just not eaten at all. Same outcome, no comparison in methods.

Another example: I may need $25,000 per year to raise my family. I can get a job and achieve the goal, or rob a bank. Same thing is achieved but they obviously are not morally equal.

With NFP you're not "doing it" then preventing pregnancy. You're just not "doing" anything, you are abstaining.

NFP can still be used sinfully and selfishly, with a contraceptive mentality, in violation of scripture. You must have a serious reason to use it.

2,706 posted on 04/09/2002 6:42:01 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2699 | View Replies]

To: Wordsmith; OLD REGGIE
I agree with what you say here but I can't help but wonder if you believe we, here on earth, can pick and choose who the Saints are. IOW How can we consider a Saint ***** if it is not up to us to decide?

We can't. There is no possible way that any human being can proclaim with any degree of certainty that any person other than Jesus and the theif have gone to heaven since the time of the Death on the Cross. And we only know that because Jesus told the thief he would be with Him in Paradise that very day. I've raised this point long ago. For all the Catholic Church knows, everyone in its pantheon of saint/ gods are in hell. And no, I'm not using the term god to be inflamatory, it merely emphasises the point of how they are used. A god for weather, a saint for weather. A god for sailors and a saint for sailors. This is by design - not God's design.

2,707 posted on 04/09/2002 6:44:17 PM PDT by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2692 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp
NFP has effective rates of approximately 95% to 99%.

Sorry, I believe these claims are incorrect, at best. But that's JMO.

2,708 posted on 04/09/2002 6:47:24 PM PDT by Iowegian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2706 | View Replies]

To: Wordsmith; Old Reggie
Jesus is the Word. Faith in Jesus is the foundation of our belief. As he is the Word, then faith in the Word is the foundation of our belief. And according to Scripture - no other foundation can be laid than that which is laid. That includes tradition. If you are going to lay a foundation for any doctrine, it must be scripture otherwise it is garbage - or according to scripture "sinking sand".
2,709 posted on 04/09/2002 6:48:28 PM PDT by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2705 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp
With NFP you're not "doing it" then preventing pregnancy. You're just not "doing" anything, you are abstaining.

Well it's at least nice to know you don't ask your priests to do something you don't do yourselves occasionally.

2,710 posted on 04/09/2002 6:50:10 PM PDT by Iowegian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2706 | View Replies]

To: Iowegian
I'm a physician, and I have the medical journal studies from unbiased sources to back it up, and I'm a nationally published author on these issues.

Could you provide some unbiased sources to back up your comment? If so I will honestly examine it.

2,711 posted on 04/09/2002 6:52:36 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2708 | View Replies]

Comment #2,712 Removed by Moderator

To: Dr. Brian Kopp
Could you provide some unbiased sources to back up your comment?

How about lots of little baby catholics waiting to be baptized?

2,713 posted on 04/09/2002 7:03:07 PM PDT by Iowegian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2711 | View Replies]

Comment #2,714 Removed by Moderator

To: angelo
Which post number did he attack you and which of your posts was he responding to? I find, in many instances, the thread should be called "Never Ending Attacks".

FReegards
John

2,715 posted on 04/09/2002 7:14:45 PM PDT by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2561 | View Replies]

To: allend, Iowegian
Are you guys seriously unable to see the diference between celibacy and contraception, or did you just present your idea in hopes that some gullible lurker would buy it?

Do you seriously think anybody takes you as being serious?

BigMack

2,716 posted on 04/09/2002 7:14:57 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2714 | View Replies]

To: poet
Which post number did he attack you and which of your posts was he responding to? I find, in many instances, the thread should be called "Never Ending Attacks".

He challenged his objectivity, is "attack" the new "talking point?"

BigMack

2,717 posted on 04/09/2002 7:19:04 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2715 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyM
When I say teach Christ and His love, I am not saying teach disobedience.

I've been lurking.

This is an issue that so many get backwards. THEY try to earn salvation and God's love by not sinning, by works. Then someone who really understands the salvation message, like yourself, tries to explain that its not the works, or "not sinning" (although that is impossible) that is the FIRST priority. The first priority is to accept Jesus Christ for who He said He was, Lord and Savior, on a personal basis. Not just knowing about Him, but knowing Him. The works, the desire not to sin, happens after Jesus is Lord, because He changes the heart. If a person loves God, he will not want to sin, although he will, because all do, but the desire of the heart is to "press on" toward Christ. And God looks at the sinner who has accepted Christ and does not see the sinner, He sees Christ!!!!

Anyway, just thought I'd add my two cents worth.

2,718 posted on 04/09/2002 7:21:35 PM PDT by LoneGreenEyeshade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2566 | View Replies]

To: angelo
Although my response, as I've just read the follow-ups to this topic, is coming in late in the game, and it looks like the big hub-bub is all over (it's funny how FreeRepublic brings out the child in all of us), here's my take:

By and large, I think Angelo is objective in his interactions. One major plus is that he's able to evaluate various ideas or beliefs by assuming certain premises to at least evaluate whether or not a belief is intellectually consistent or logically articulated correctly.

The only place where I've seen him lose his normally unflappable sense of objectivity is with regard to historical relationship between the Catholic Church and the Jews. But who's perfect?

2,719 posted on 04/09/2002 7:27:39 PM PDT by Proud2BAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2561 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
Well, he does have a point: Do you know that there is a huge difference between celibacy and contraception? (This is an honest question.)
2,720 posted on 04/09/2002 7:29:18 PM PDT by Proud2BAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2716 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,681-2,7002,701-2,7202,721-2,740 ... 65,521-65,537 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson