Posted on 02/12/2003 8:35:27 PM PST by rwfromkansas
In the spring of 1999, as George W. Bush was about to announce his run for President, he agreed to be interviewed about his religious faith -- grudgingly. "I want people to judge me on my deeds, not how I try to define myself as a religious person of words."
It's hard to believe that's the same George W. Bush as now. Since taking office -- and especially in the last weeks -- Bush's personal faith has turned highly public, arguably more so than any modern president. What's important is not that Bush is talking about God but that he's talking about him differently. We are witnessing a shift in Bush's theology – from talking mostly about a Wesleyan theology of "personal transformation" to describing a Calvinist "divine plan" laid out by a sovereign God for the country and himself. This shift has the potential to affect Bush's approach to terrorism, Iraq and his presidency.
On Thursday (Feb.6) at the National Prayer Breakfast, for instance, Bush said, "we can be confident in the ways of Providence. ... Behind all of life and all of history, there's a dedication and purpose, set by the hand of a just and faithful God."
Calvin, whose ideas are critical to contemporary evangelical thought, focused on the idea of a powerful God who governs "the vast machinery of the whole world."
Bush has made several statements indicating he believes God is involved in world events and that he and America have a divinely guided mission:
-- After Bush's Sept. 20, 2001, speech to Congress, Bush speechwriter Mike Gerson called the president and said: "Mr. President, when I saw you on television, I thought -- God wanted you there." "He wants us all here, Gerson," the president responded.
In that speech, Bush said, "Freedom and fear, justice and cruelty, have always been at war, and we know that God is not neutral between them." The implication: God will intervene on the world stage, mediating between good and evil.
At the prayer breakfast, during which he talked about God's impact on history, he also said, he felt "the presence of the Almighty" while comforting the families of the shuttle astronauts during the Houston memorial service on Feb. 4.
-- In his State of the Union address last month, Bush said the nation puts its confidence in the loving God "behind all of life, and all of history" and that "we go forward with confidence, because this call of history has come to the right country. May He guide us now."
In addition to these public statements indicating a divine intervention in world events, there is evidence Bush believes his election as president was a result of God's acts.
A month after the World Trade Center attack, World Magazine, a conservative Christian publication, quoted Tim Goeglein, deputy director of White House public liaison, saying, "I think President Bush is God's man at this hour, and I say this with a great sense of humility." Time magazine reported, "Privately, Bush even talked of being chosen by the grace of God to lead at that moment." The net effect is a theology that seems to imply that God is intervening in events, is on America's side, and has chosen Bush to be in the White House at this critical moment.
"All sorts of warning signals ought to go off when a sense of personal chosenness and calling gets translated into a sense of calling and mission for a nation," says Robin Lovin, a United Methodist ethicist and professor of religion and political thought at Southern Methodist University in Dallas. Lovin says what the president seems to be lacking is theological humility and an awareness of moral ambiguity.
Richard Land, a top Southern Baptist leader with close ties to the White House, argues that Bush's sense of divine oversight is part of why he has become such a good wartime leader. He brings a moral clarity and self-confidence that inspires Americans and scares enemies. "We don't inhabit that relativist universe (of European leaders)," Land says. "We really believe some things are good and some things bad."
It's even possible that Bush's belief in America's moral rightness makes the country's military threats seem more genuine because the world thinks Bush is "on a mission."
Presidents have always used Scripture in their speeches as a source of poetry and morality, according to Michael Waldman, President Clinton's chief speechwriter, author of "POTUS Speaks" and now a visiting professor at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government.
Lincoln, he says, was the first president to use the Bible extensively in his speeches, but one of the main reasons was that his audience knew the Bible -- Lincoln was using what was then common language. Theodore Roosevelt, in his 1912 speech to the Progressive Party, closed with these words: "We stand at the edge of Armageddon." Carter, Reagan and Clinton all used Scripture, but Waldman says their use was more as a "grace note."
Bush is different, because he uses theology as the guts of his argument. "That's very unusual in the long sweep of American history," Waldman says.
Bush has clearly seen a divine aspect to his presidency since before he ran. Many Americans know the president had a religious conversion at age 39, when he, as he describes it, "came to the Lord" after a weekend of talks with the Rev. Billy Graham. Within a year, he gave up drinking and joined a men's Bible study group at First United Methodist Church in Midland, Texas. From that point on, he has often said, his Christian faith has grown.
Less well known is that, in 1995, soon after he was elected Texas governor, Bush sent a memo to his staff, asking them to stop by his office to look at a painting entitled "A Charge to Keep" by W.H.D. Koerner, lent to him by Joe O'Neill, a friend from Midland. The painting is based on the Charles Wesley hymn of the same name, and Bush told his staff he especially liked the second verse: "To serve the present age, my calling to fulfill; O may it all my powers engage to do my Master's will." Bush said those words represented their mission. "What adds complete life to the painting for me is the message of Charles Wesley that we serve One greater than ourselves."
By 1999, Bush was saying he believed in a "divine plan that supersedes all human plans." He talked of being inspired to run for president by a sermon delivered by the Rev. Mark Craig, pastor of Bush's Dallas congregation, Highland Park United Methodist Church.
Craig talked about the reluctance of Moses to become a leader. But, said Mr. Craig, then as now, people were "starved for leadership" -- leaders who sacrifice to do the right thing. Bush said the sermon "spoke directly to my heart and talked about a higher calling." But in 1999, as he prepared to run for president, he was quick to add in an interview: "Elections are determined by human beings."
Richard Land recalls being part of a group of about a dozen people who met after Bush's second inauguration as Texas governor in 1999.
At the time, everyone in Texas was talking about Bush's potential to become the next president. During the meeting, Land says, Bush said, "I believe God wants me to be president, but if that doesn't happen, it's OK." Land points out that Bush didn't say that God actually wanted him to be president. He said he believed God wanted him to be president.
During World War II, the American Protestant thinker Reinhold Niebuhr wrote about God's role in political decision-making. He believed every political leader and every political system falls short of absolute justice -- that the Allies didn't represent absolute right and Hitler didn't represent absolute evil because all of us, as humans, stand under the ultimate judgment of God. That doesn't mean politicians can't make judgments based on what they believe is right; it does mean they need to understand that their position isn't absolutely morally clear.
"Sometimes Bush comes close to crossing the line of trying to serve the nation as its religious leader, rather than its political leader," says C. Welton Gaddy, president of the Interfaith Alliance, a clergy-led liberal lobbying group.
Certainly, European leaders seem to be bothered by Bush's rhetoric and it possibly does contribute to a sense in Islamic countries that Bush is on an anti-Islamic "crusade."
Radwan Masmoudi, executive director of the Washington-based Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy, worries about it. "Muslims, all over the world, are very concerned that the war on terrorism is being hijacked by right-wing fundamentalists, and transformed into a war, or at least a conflict, with Islam. President Bush is a man of faith, and that is a positive attribute, but he also needs to learn about and respect the other faiths, including Islam, in order to represent and serve all Americans."
In hindsight, even Bush's inaugural address presaged his emerging theology. He quoted a colonist who wrote to Thomas Jefferson that "We know the race is not to the swift nor the battle to the strong. Do you not think an angel rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm?" Then Bush said: "Much time has passed since Jefferson arrived for his inauguration. The years and changes accumulate, but the themes of this day he would know, `our nation's grand story of courage and its simple dream of dignity.'
"We are not this story's author, who fills time and eternity with his purpose. Yet his purpose is achieved in our duty, and our duty is fulfilled in service to one another. Never tiring, never yielding, never finishing, we renew that purpose today; to make our country more just and generous; to affirm the dignity of our lives and every life.
"This work continues. This story goes on. And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm."
That sounds soooooo "loving" to shallow thinkers. Tell that to the families that lost loved ones in the Twin Towers.
I'd hate to be your mother, wife, or daughter if criminals broke in your house and set about raping them.
You'd stand there "praying for your enemies", and do nothing to defend them??
How pious.
Go hang out in the beauty parlor with the other feminized males that can't be depended on to take the steps necessary to protect innocent women and children from evil people.
My Pope opposes this war. I am a faithful Catholic. I take his views seriously. His intel is as good as ours. His moral and ethical considerations are impeccable. His politics are non-existant. He does not play politics when it comes to the lives of the innocent. Having lived under both Nazis and Communists, he is not naive about the evils of men like Saddam.
Is it verboten to discuus the opinion of the single most respected Christian leader in the world on this Forum?
If no, why plan on banning anyone who simply questions the ethical dimensions of the planned war?
If yes, that appears to justify my suspicions regarding your policy regarding Catholicism.
Questioning this war, especially as a Catholic well read in Just war theory as many here are, does not make anyone anti-American, as you well know.
No more than you are anti-Catholic, if that is what you are saying in your posts to me.
*whistle* *whistle* *whistle*
I do not understand this banning at all, especially when other Freepers are allowed to roam the threads with endless anti-Catholic invective.
I like you Siobhan, but why does it usually have to come down to accusing people of anti-Catholicism?
So don't get uppity..... ;^)
I hope you survived that post.....
BigMack
Bigot. And folks wonder why we point anti-Catholic bigotry out? And myopic fools refuse to admit its existence on this Forum?
Go hang out in the beauty parlor with the other feminized males that can't be depended on to take the steps necessary to protect innocent women and children from evil people.
You call yourself a Christian? Bigots such as you are not.
If I get banned and a new FReeper appears named UppityPapist think the mods will know its me ? ;-)
Its not in my nature to ignore injustice and bigotry. Even if it means I get banned.
Polycarp: "You call yourself a Christian? Bigots such as you are not."
The truth hurts, huh? Hahaha
They were not my words; they were Jesus' words. You got a problem with them, tell Jesus. BTW, I was associating John Paul II's mercy and kindness with Christ's. He is not perfect, but obviously far more than you.
Tell that to the families that lost loved ones in the Twin Towers.
Don't make me look like an unsympathetic, unpatriotic FReeper. I am just as angry and just as upset with 9/11 as you or anyone else.
I'd hate to be your mother, wife, or daughter if criminals broke in your house and set about raping them.
Why the insult?
You'd stand there "praying for your enemies", and do nothing to defend them??
Are you ignorant? Your answer to that is my answer. I'm not a pacifist.
How pious.
God calls us all to holiness. You got a problem with that?
Go hang out in the beauty parlor with the other feminized males that can't be depended on to take the steps necessary to protect innocent women and children from evil people.
You accuse me of being incapable of defending and protecting. I didn't indicate anything like that. I didn't indicate that I'm against the war. In fact, I support the president. About the only thing you've done is shown yourself to be a jackass.
There is a history to CG's build-up to this point. I'll share with you a brief excerpt from his last correspondence with me:
I suspect I am headed for a permanent ban. That is not my goal but I think that might eventuate. With every fiber of my being, I am opposed to this UnJust War and I will do what I can to register my complaints/objections. I supsect that will draw a permanent ban. C'est le vie.
I am not only just running my mouth. I have been thinking about what I had to do to oppose the war and Doc has mentioned fasting recently...and recent scripture readings have focused on Nineveh...and I was rereading The Didache, where Wednesday and Friday fasting (every week)is noted and the course of action became obvious.....Total Fast (just water/fruit juice) every Wednesday and Friday in reparation for Sin...my own, the priest's scandal..the UnJust War waged by my Gov't...
There is legitimate Christian discussion regarding the Just or Unjust nature of this coming war.
It is not anti-American to discuss it.
If that is the editorial position of this Forum, they're simply wrong. It is not anti-American to discuss it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.