Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George Bush's Theology: Does President Believe He Has Divine Mandate?
Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life ^ | February 12, 2003 | Deborah Caldwell

Posted on 02/12/2003 8:35:27 PM PST by rwfromkansas

In the spring of 1999, as George W. Bush was about to announce his run for President, he agreed to be interviewed about his religious faith -- grudgingly. "I want people to judge me on my deeds, not how I try to define myself as a religious person of words."

It's hard to believe that's the same George W. Bush as now. Since taking office -- and especially in the last weeks -- Bush's personal faith has turned highly public, arguably more so than any modern president. What's important is not that Bush is talking about God but that he's talking about him differently. We are witnessing a shift in Bush's theology – from talking mostly about a Wesleyan theology of "personal transformation" to describing a Calvinist "divine plan" laid out by a sovereign God for the country and himself. This shift has the potential to affect Bush's approach to terrorism, Iraq and his presidency.

On Thursday (Feb.6) at the National Prayer Breakfast, for instance, Bush said, "we can be confident in the ways of Providence. ... Behind all of life and all of history, there's a dedication and purpose, set by the hand of a just and faithful God."

Calvin, whose ideas are critical to contemporary evangelical thought, focused on the idea of a powerful God who governs "the vast machinery of the whole world."

Bush has made several statements indicating he believes God is involved in world events and that he and America have a divinely guided mission:

-- After Bush's Sept. 20, 2001, speech to Congress, Bush speechwriter Mike Gerson called the president and said: "Mr. President, when I saw you on television, I thought -- God wanted you there." "He wants us all here, Gerson," the president responded.

In that speech, Bush said, "Freedom and fear, justice and cruelty, have always been at war, and we know that God is not neutral between them." The implication: God will intervene on the world stage, mediating between good and evil.

At the prayer breakfast, during which he talked about God's impact on history, he also said, he felt "the presence of the Almighty" while comforting the families of the shuttle astronauts during the Houston memorial service on Feb. 4.

-- In his State of the Union address last month, Bush said the nation puts its confidence in the loving God "behind all of life, and all of history" and that "we go forward with confidence, because this call of history has come to the right country. May He guide us now."

In addition to these public statements indicating a divine intervention in world events, there is evidence Bush believes his election as president was a result of God's acts.

A month after the World Trade Center attack, World Magazine, a conservative Christian publication, quoted Tim Goeglein, deputy director of White House public liaison, saying, "I think President Bush is God's man at this hour, and I say this with a great sense of humility." Time magazine reported, "Privately, Bush even talked of being chosen by the grace of God to lead at that moment." The net effect is a theology that seems to imply that God is intervening in events, is on America's side, and has chosen Bush to be in the White House at this critical moment.

"All sorts of warning signals ought to go off when a sense of personal chosenness and calling gets translated into a sense of calling and mission for a nation," says Robin Lovin, a United Methodist ethicist and professor of religion and political thought at Southern Methodist University in Dallas. Lovin says what the president seems to be lacking is theological humility and an awareness of moral ambiguity.

Richard Land, a top Southern Baptist leader with close ties to the White House, argues that Bush's sense of divine oversight is part of why he has become such a good wartime leader. He brings a moral clarity and self-confidence that inspires Americans and scares enemies. "We don't inhabit that relativist universe (of European leaders)," Land says. "We really believe some things are good and some things bad."

It's even possible that Bush's belief in America's moral rightness makes the country's military threats seem more genuine because the world thinks Bush is "on a mission."

Presidents have always used Scripture in their speeches as a source of poetry and morality, according to Michael Waldman, President Clinton's chief speechwriter, author of "POTUS Speaks" and now a visiting professor at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government.

Lincoln, he says, was the first president to use the Bible extensively in his speeches, but one of the main reasons was that his audience knew the Bible -- Lincoln was using what was then common language. Theodore Roosevelt, in his 1912 speech to the Progressive Party, closed with these words: "We stand at the edge of Armageddon." Carter, Reagan and Clinton all used Scripture, but Waldman says their use was more as a "grace note."

Bush is different, because he uses theology as the guts of his argument. "That's very unusual in the long sweep of American history," Waldman says.

Bush has clearly seen a divine aspect to his presidency since before he ran. Many Americans know the president had a religious conversion at age 39, when he, as he describes it, "came to the Lord" after a weekend of talks with the Rev. Billy Graham. Within a year, he gave up drinking and joined a men's Bible study group at First United Methodist Church in Midland, Texas. From that point on, he has often said, his Christian faith has grown.

Less well known is that, in 1995, soon after he was elected Texas governor, Bush sent a memo to his staff, asking them to stop by his office to look at a painting entitled "A Charge to Keep" by W.H.D. Koerner, lent to him by Joe O'Neill, a friend from Midland. The painting is based on the Charles Wesley hymn of the same name, and Bush told his staff he especially liked the second verse: "To serve the present age, my calling to fulfill; O may it all my powers engage to do my Master's will." Bush said those words represented their mission. "What adds complete life to the painting for me is the message of Charles Wesley that we serve One greater than ourselves."

By 1999, Bush was saying he believed in a "divine plan that supersedes all human plans." He talked of being inspired to run for president by a sermon delivered by the Rev. Mark Craig, pastor of Bush's Dallas congregation, Highland Park United Methodist Church.

Craig talked about the reluctance of Moses to become a leader. But, said Mr. Craig, then as now, people were "starved for leadership" -- leaders who sacrifice to do the right thing. Bush said the sermon "spoke directly to my heart and talked about a higher calling." But in 1999, as he prepared to run for president, he was quick to add in an interview: "Elections are determined by human beings."

Richard Land recalls being part of a group of about a dozen people who met after Bush's second inauguration as Texas governor in 1999.

At the time, everyone in Texas was talking about Bush's potential to become the next president. During the meeting, Land says, Bush said, "I believe God wants me to be president, but if that doesn't happen, it's OK." Land points out that Bush didn't say that God actually wanted him to be president. He said he believed God wanted him to be president.

During World War II, the American Protestant thinker Reinhold Niebuhr wrote about God's role in political decision-making. He believed every political leader and every political system falls short of absolute justice -- that the Allies didn't represent absolute right and Hitler didn't represent absolute evil because all of us, as humans, stand under the ultimate judgment of God. That doesn't mean politicians can't make judgments based on what they believe is right; it does mean they need to understand that their position isn't absolutely morally clear.

"Sometimes Bush comes close to crossing the line of trying to serve the nation as its religious leader, rather than its political leader," says C. Welton Gaddy, president of the Interfaith Alliance, a clergy-led liberal lobbying group.

Certainly, European leaders seem to be bothered by Bush's rhetoric and it possibly does contribute to a sense in Islamic countries that Bush is on an anti-Islamic "crusade."

Radwan Masmoudi, executive director of the Washington-based Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy, worries about it. "Muslims, all over the world, are very concerned that the war on terrorism is being hijacked by right-wing fundamentalists, and transformed into a war, or at least a conflict, with Islam. President Bush is a man of faith, and that is a positive attribute, but he also needs to learn about and respect the other faiths, including Islam, in order to represent and serve all Americans."

In hindsight, even Bush's inaugural address presaged his emerging theology. He quoted a colonist who wrote to Thomas Jefferson that "We know the race is not to the swift nor the battle to the strong. Do you not think an angel rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm?" Then Bush said: "Much time has passed since Jefferson arrived for his inauguration. The years and changes accumulate, but the themes of this day he would know, `our nation's grand story of courage and its simple dream of dignity.'

"We are not this story's author, who fills time and eternity with his purpose. Yet his purpose is achieved in our duty, and our duty is fulfilled in service to one another. Never tiring, never yielding, never finishing, we renew that purpose today; to make our country more just and generous; to affirm the dignity of our lives and every life.

"This work continues. This story goes on. And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm."


TOPICS: Current Events; Evangelical Christian; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: bush; catholiclist; providence; religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 781-794 next last
To: ultima ratio
Very good insights.
341 posted on 02/14/2003 8:37:07 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Has Job become arrogant? It seems to me that his very questioning has lead him close to God.
342 posted on 02/14/2003 8:40:01 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
***Has Job become arrogant?***

From my sermon notes:

Job begins to demand a hearing. [13:3; 16:21; 23:3; 31:35-37]

“Oh, that I had someone to hear me! I sign now my defense—let the Almighty answer me; let my accuser put his indictment in writing. Surely I would wear it on my shoulder, I would put it on like a crown. I would give Him an account of my every step; like a prince I would approach Him.”
343 posted on 02/14/2003 8:47:24 PM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
***It seems to me that his very questioning has lead him close to God.***

It leads him to repentance and therefore closer to God.

Divine Questions: [38:1-40:2]

Job’s Response: [40:3-5] “I put my hand over my mouth.”

Divine Questions: [40:6-41:34]

Job’s Response: [42:1-6] “I repent in dust and ashes.”
344 posted on 02/14/2003 8:48:48 PM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Is repentence the right word? Maybe realization.
345 posted on 02/14/2003 9:12:33 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
***Is repentence the right word?***

The Hebrew verb in BDB (Brown Driver Briggs Lexicon) means to be sorry, to rue, to repent. The dust and ashes indicates the same.
346 posted on 02/14/2003 9:36:19 PM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Yes, but the bottom line is that even in anger--Job is utterly honest. So even anger with God can be a prayer if it's honest. Doubt also, if it's honestly faced. This is startling--but it makes sense.

My cousin lost a three year old a few years back--the child had some minor surgery, but never recovered. My cousin was furious with God and when a priest tried to comfort her, she lashed out at him.

In the same way I think Job lashed out and to his friends crossed the line into blasphemy. At one point he even asks God, "Is it right for You to be so vicious?" Yet for me the interesting fact is that God reproves the others who have been dealing in empty religious platitudes with no bearing on reality or truth (like the priest who tried to comfort my cousin) and at the same time praises Job because he has spoken the truth.

The truth IS that the good and bad suffer or prosper at apparent random. From our perspective, if we're honest, there is no moral logic whatever in how individuals are hit by fate. God approves of this absolute honesty, however much it seems superficially to indict Him. He reproves pious utterances and airtight theologies that paint a picture that is rosier than is real--and which reveals a fear of looking at reality truthfully.

347 posted on 02/14/2003 9:36:40 PM PST by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Of what did he repent, except his ignorance?
348 posted on 02/14/2003 9:38:50 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
I agree with your assessment. The psalms also reflect this emotional openness in coming before God.
349 posted on 02/14/2003 9:40:01 PM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Absolutely--and are very cleansing when prayed in that frame of mind.
350 posted on 02/14/2003 9:43:49 PM PST by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
He repented of his arrogance in demanding that God give him and audience and explain to him why he was suffering. His initial humble why gives way over time to a demand WHY!

Read Job's words carefully...

Oh, that I had someone to hear me! I sign now my defense—let the Almighty answer me; let my accuser put his indictment in writing. Surely I would wear it on my shoulder, I would put it on like a crown. I would give Him an account of my every step; like a prince I would approach Him.”

Note after God's theological quiz, Job acknowledges his error.

42 Then Job replied to the LORD:

2 “I know that you can do all things;
no plan of yours can be thwarted.
3 You asked, ‘Who is this that obscures my counsel without
knowledge?’
Surely I spoke of things I did not understand,
things too wonderful for me to know.

4 “You said, ‘Listen now, and I will speak;
I will question you,
and you shall answer me.’
5 My ears had heard of you
but now my eyes have seen you.
6 Therefore I despise myself
and repent in dust and ashes.”

And also...

40 The LORD said to Job:

2 “Will the one who contends with the Almighty correct him?
Let him who accuses God answer him!”
3 Then Job answered the LORD:

4 “I am unworthy—how can I reply to you?
I put my hand over my mouth.
5 I spoke once, but I have no answer—
twice, but I will say no more.”
6 Then the LORD spoke to Job out of the storm:

7 “Brace yourself like a man;
I will question you,
and you shall answer me.

8 “Would you discredit my justice?
Would you condemn me to justify yourself?

God accuses Job of condemning God and calling His justice into question. This is why Job repents.
351 posted on 02/14/2003 9:46:45 PM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
Agreed. To often Christians feel they can not be emotionally open before God. Sad, since He is omniscient and knows our emotions. Better to be open and allow Him to cleanse us.

Psalm 13
1 How long, O LORD? Will you forget me forever?
How long will you hide your face from me?
2 How long must I wrestle with my thoughts
and every day have sorrow in my heart?
How long will my enemy triumph over me?

3 Look on me and answer, O LORD my God.
Give light to my eyes, or I will sleep in death;
4 my enemy will say, “I have overcome him,”
and my foes will rejoice when I fall.

5 But I trust in your unfailing love;
my heart rejoices in your salvation.
6 I will sing to the LORD,
for he has been good to me.
352 posted on 02/14/2003 9:50:58 PM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Again, Job is guilty only of ignorance of the power of God. God never explains himself. he just acts.
353 posted on 02/14/2003 9:56:49 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
I've done my best to explain to you that the word repent is in the Hebrew text. I have shown you the charges God levels against Job. That's the best I can do.
354 posted on 02/14/2003 9:59:29 PM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain; drstevej; sandyeggo; yendu bwam; rwfromkansas; Codie; MEGoody; ...
Why did Catholic Guy get banned.
355 posted on 02/14/2003 10:08:21 PM PST by Jael (Thy Word is Truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
I avoided Job for years because I thought it was about how to handle suffering. I thought if I studied the book, I would then be equipped to handle suffering, and then God would give me some, and I didn't want it.

Then I suffered. So I read Job. And I found out I needed to repent.


Psalms 119:71  ¶It is good for me that I have been afflicted; that I might learn thy statutes.

Psalms 119:67  ¶Before I was afflicted I went astray: but now have I kept thy word.

356 posted on 02/14/2003 10:17:58 PM PST by Jael (Thy Word is Truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
One_Particular_Harbour, now known as the consumate anti-Catholic bigot Chancellor Palpatine

OPH == CP??? When did that happen? I didn't even know OPH was banned. I waste far more time here than I should, but FR still feels like a soap opera I watch once a year.

357 posted on 02/14/2003 10:20:42 PM PST by perform_to_strangers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
The senario that is set up in Job is that he is guilty of nothing. The inadequacy of God's answer has been pointed out many times. On the crossed Jesus asked a question that was really part of the answer(given in the rest of the Psalm):" My God, why have you abandoned me...."
358 posted on 02/14/2003 10:24:17 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Job 42:5  I have heard of thee by the hearing of the ear: but now mine eye seeth thee.

6  Wherefore I abhor myself, and repent in dust and ashes.
359 posted on 02/14/2003 10:24:26 PM PST by Jael (Thy Word is Truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: Jael
Humilation, which is really a knowledge of one's true worth.
360 posted on 02/14/2003 10:26:52 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 781-794 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson