The writers of this article (publication) seem to think that the object in life is to “pig out” as much as possible — rather than the much more intelligent strategy of trying as many different things as possible — which is really the strength of the buffets — as well as potlucks.
Only in the old world of journalism do people still think that greater quantities of the same thing is a virtue and advantage — and where plagiarism and purging alternative ideas have become their guiding principles — and the reason for the collapse of their “empires.” The 21st century is not about getting everybody to conform to their consensus viewpoint — but that people want to hear different perspectives and alternatives — and not just their one politically correct and enforced narratives.
We want to taste the whole world — and not just get something for nothing — or very little in a fair exchange of money and ideas. That mainly explains why these “journalists” are obese, in poor health and condition, and feel so entitled from everybody else — while offering very little or nothing of value in exchange.
These writers (journalists) don’t seem to understand that variety is preferred — whether eating or learning, and not just the “Hey, hey, ho, ho...” they want us to chant indiscriminately after them.