Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Analysis: The potentate of the Super-Stans (bin Laden's Ultimate Goal?)
UPI ^ | 9/19/01 | CLAUDE SALHANI

Posted on 09/20/2001 10:47:52 AM PDT by Clinton's a liar

WASHINGTON, Sept. 19 (UPI) -- Make no mistake about it, Osama bin Laden is very astute.

I'm not referring to last week's horrific attacks on New York and Washington that left thousands dead, much of New York in disarray and the country and the civilized world in shock. I'm talking about his long-term planning. Planning that calls for a revolution in current political thinking throughout Central Asia, the Middle East and the rest of the Islamic world.

Like any revolution that needs to survive, bin Laden and his Al-Qaida movement must continue to grow, or it will die. In his quest for Muslim expansion bin Laden would like to see the "Balkanization," or in this case the Islamization, of Central Asia. Maybe Islamization is the wrong word because there is little that is Islamic about his ways, which, says professor Akbar Ahmad, Chair of Islamic Studies at the American University's School of International Studies in Washington, DC, "are not Islamic at all."

"What makes it worse for Muslims is that the West is equating the Taliban's un-Islamic acts with Islam. This is a double affront to Muslims," Ahmad told UPI. "The first step the West needs to undertake is to better understand Islam."

Nevertheless, bin Laden is using Islam, much like Adolf Hitler used National Socialism, and Pol Pot communism. Had he been around in the 1960s or 1970s, he would just as easily have adopted communism as a platform in order to propel his cause. But mix in religious fervor and any revolution becomes all the more potent, and dangerous.

"It's a very complex situation," said Ahmad. This pan-Islamic movement "may be called Taliban in one country, and it is called something else in others." Several intelligence sources say bin Laden's network extends to more than 60 countries.

The Taliban's main aim, according to Ahmad, is to "shake up the West's structure." While bin Laden and the Taliban are not openly talking about a greater Islamic entity, others, such as Al Muhajeroun, a group based in Britain, and with whom bin Laden enjoys close ties, are talking about a "Caliphate."

Some observers confirm that bin Laden has called Mullah Omar, the Taliban's supreme leader, "the leader of all Muslims." This equates to calling Omar a caliph.

Bin Laden's first step was to hijack Islam to fit his cause, passing himself off as a fervent religious man. That, of course, is meant to win him the support of hordes of fanatics who know little, if anything, of the Koran. On the other hand, as the chief executive officer of terror, he knows exactly what he is doing and where he wants to go.

Anyone with his mindset would clearly not be content to remain holed up in the bleak caves of Afghanistan. So the question, of course, is what next?

Next would be to consolidate his operations with the Taliban's. That has pretty much been achieved. "They are working in tandem," said professor Ahmad.

In order to better grasp what bin Laden's long-term thinking is you will need to look at a map of Central Asia.

Afghanistan, where bin Laden has set up camp, is a desolate country without much of an infrastructure, reeling under a heavy burden following years of Soviet invasion, war and a disastrous civil conflict -- a perfect place from which to launch a revolution. Much of the terrain is inaccessible, except by horseback, making the task of modern armies impossible. Just ask the Russians.

The country is ruled by the Taliban, a group of fanatic Islamists who feel threatened by modernism and who wish to impose their medieval ways on the rest of the world.

To the south and east of Afghanistan lies Pakistan, another country that sits on the fence of Muslim fundamentalism. The Taliban have warned Pakistan that siding with the United States would bring down the wrath of the Muslim world upon it. Pakistan, an Islamic country, is in a most precarious situation. The percentage of the country's population that supports the fundamentalists is in question, but some analysts believe the Taliban enjoys strong support in the army and the intelligence services.

This gives the country's ruler, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, a very fine line to tread. It also makes him an important friend of the United States and any Western coalition.

"The situation for Pakistan is very difficult," said Ahmad. "Pakistan is between a rock and a hard place. Musharraf is sitting on a tiger," said Ahmad. "You either ride it or you are inside its belly."

In a televised address to his nation Wednesday, Musharraf stressed the importance of not choosing the wrong side. "Pakistan comes first," Musharraf said, trying to reassure his countrymen that supporting an international effort in combating terrorism is in the country's national interest. "Pakistan faces one of its most critical times in history," said Musharraf.

With its nuclear capabilities, Pakistan would represent an ideal asset for bin Laden and the Taliban, should it fall off the fence and into their hands. Think of the consequences.

Ahmad sees this situation offering Pakistan an opportunity to once and for all set it on a course to rediscover its own destiny.

"Pakistan lost its course somewhere along the way. Something has gone terribly wrong. The leaders of Pakistan now have the opportunity to reassess and to put their house in order. The big question is will they do it?"

Regardless, bin Laden's next step would be to extend the reach of his Muslim fundamentalism. Tajikistan, to the northeast, Uzbekistan to the immediate north and Turkmenistan to the northwest -- all three are former Soviet republics with whom Afghanistan shares a border and a common religion.

Besides geographic expansion, giving them greater power in numbers, (combined population of more than 35 million people), these countries offer a wide range of natural resources. Turkmenistan borders the Caspian Sea, a short hop to Azerbaijan, another former Soviet republic, and a Muslim country.

Given that scenario, the new Muslim empire, or Caliphate, governed by bin Laden or the Taliban would encircle Iran, itself a Muslim nation, also rich in oil and other natural resources.

Now look at the map again and see the implications that would have on the rest of the oil-rich Arabian Gulf. Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, the Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Oman are only a small step and a revolution away. Remember the old domino effect theory much feared by the West -- especially the United States -- during the Vietnam War?

Now look at the map again, we are back in the Middle East. Palestine, Israel, Jordan, Egypt, North Africa and sub-Saharan Africa are the natural extension for a Taliban Caliphate.

Think this is an unbelievable scenario? It was done a few centuries ago. Bin Laden is far too astute to content himself with the caves of Afghanistan. Read between the lines of his communiqués and the picture will become much clearer.

--

Copyright 2001 by United Press International.

All rights reserved.

--

Posted for educational and discussion purposes only.


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
More interesting input into bin Laden's twisted mind.
1 posted on 09/20/2001 10:47:52 AM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: diotima
Ping!
2 posted on 09/20/2001 10:48:29 AM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: major-pelham
I saw you ask the following question on another thread and realized I hadn't yet posted this piece:

"Is this piece obliquely saying that the Taliban are empire builders ? Are they looking to take Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan back to the stone age with them?"

Pinging you to this thread, FYI.

3 posted on 09/20/2001 10:49:47 AM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
Thanks for posting this article.
4 posted on 09/20/2001 10:54:35 AM PDT by Angelwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Angelwood
You're quite welcome, m'dear. Good to see you.
5 posted on 09/20/2001 10:56:49 AM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Ping!
6 posted on 09/20/2001 10:57:19 AM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a rapist
Ping!
7 posted on 09/20/2001 10:57:43 AM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freethesheeples
Ping!
8 posted on 09/20/2001 11:01:57 AM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
Pakistan is pro-Islam and anybody that thinks it will be a friend of the US long-term is smoking dope. The stable government of the country is very likely to fall within the next three months...especially after operations start against Binny. Pakistan will break up into at least two little empires, with hard-line Muslims and liberal-Muslims taking the dividing line. And the funny subject then will be who controls the nukes? US forces will have to rush in and take possession immedately. We need to plan for this outcome right now. As for the other little republics around Afganistan....the same problem will exist for them in several months too. This whole region may become Bin Laden-Land. And the funny thing will be the years that we spend in this waste-land. We aren't talking about a measely 3 or 4 like ole Bill used to mention for the Balkans...we could be talking of 10 to 15....and our kids will be fighting there even in 2015. No one wins. Thats the bad part of this whole episode.
9 posted on 09/20/2001 11:02:52 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
Did anyone see the two hr special on discovery channel last night? It was the best I have ever seen on Islamic ferver put forth by the likes lof Osma! It went into graphic detail on how he came to power.
10 posted on 09/20/2001 11:03:58 AM PDT by cksharks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
Thanks for the ping! This underscores how important Bush's achievement was in bringing Pakistan into the fold right now.

The Taliban's feeble hopes now lie in attacking Pakistan and hoping to create a civil war in which Islamic fundamentalists prevail. Otherwise, the US will crush the ragtag elements of the Taliban's fighting forces, decapitate their leadership, and kill bin Laden in an effort to capture him.

I don't like bin Laden's chances of success.

11 posted on 09/20/2001 11:06:54 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
Who says an Islamic country can't be pro-Western?
12 posted on 09/20/2001 11:09:25 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
This is a frightening revelation, I wonder if Bin Ladin put the US into this equation? Did he know that we would react in this way, or have we thrown his plans into disarray? Question is, will going on the offensive what he wants, or was he expecting us to just hunker down in terror.

Either way, we should and need to go to war, and if it falls within his planning, then we need to make the total and absolute destruction of his networks and himself as our first and foremost priority. Then we will be walking into something else, will we be creating a martyr for the cause that the people of Islam will rally behind?

Scary thoughts either way, but, we cannot allow this terrorism to continue. We must make thier fear stronger then thier hate. We will know when we win, because when a cleric declares Jihad and his congragation strings him up, then we have won!!!
13 posted on 09/20/2001 11:12:07 AM PDT by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cksharks
I didn't see it, cksharks. I can't seem to take the TV off of the news channels yet!

Thanks for the heads up, though. I'll see if I can find a rebroadcast.

14 posted on 09/20/2001 11:12:07 AM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"Thanks for the ping!"

You're quite welcome!

"This underscores how important Bush's achievement was in bringing Pakistan into the fold right now."

I'm in full agreement with you there.

15 posted on 09/20/2001 11:13:36 AM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Good post...
In regards to the comparisons of WTC to Pearl Harbor, I would say the greater parallel would be to the first attacks by the barbarians on the Roman Empire. Not that I expect the results to be the same, but this does seem to be an attack on civilization as we know it. Contemplate the ramifications of a simultaneous 10 city attack of EMP bombs on our economic structure. No phones, computer, radio, TV, electricity, refrigerators, most cooking methods gone, no cars, on a city wide scale. No business done, no way to restore all services for at least a month. How is food distributed? What if this took place in winter? Insurance system implodes, gov't can't bail everyone out, so we have to reorganize into a simpler economy and society. Basically the risk that our business & social structures would have to be reorganized, could that be done before a collapse set in?

Perhaps better put in the terms of the Post-Modernists, Bin Laden is attempting to Deconstruct Western Civilization.

16 posted on 09/20/2001 11:16:08 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Ping!
17 posted on 09/20/2001 11:17:02 AM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
Thank you for your analysis. I wholeheartedly disagree, however, with your assertion that this region will fall under the control of bin Laden. I think you are grossly underestimating America's resolve.

Also, I disagree with your insinuation that our problem is will all Muslims.

I do agree, however, that the nuclear facilities in Pakistan need to be an US priority.

Regards.

18 posted on 09/20/2001 11:20:57 AM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
"Either way, we should and need to go to war, and if it falls within his planning, then we need to make the total and absolute destruction of his networks and himself as our first and foremost priority."

Complete and total destruction of bin Laden and his networks is what is called for. I agree wholeheartedly.

19 posted on 09/20/2001 11:22:43 AM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
"Perhaps better put in the terms of the Post-Modernists, Bin Laden is attempting to Deconstruct Western Civilization."

Precisely. But I believe he jumped the gun.

20 posted on 09/20/2001 11:24:34 AM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson