Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SISTERS SUPPORT PILOTS
Second Amendment Sisters ^ | 10/08/01 | Maria Heil

Posted on 10/09/2001 3:48:08 PM PDT by 2nd amendment mama

==============================
NEWS FROM THE SECOND AMENDMENT SISTERS
900 R.R. 620 S
Suite C101, Box 228
Austin, TX 78734
World Wide Web: http://www.2asisters.org
Toll-free 877-271-6216
==============================
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 8, 2001
==============================
For additional information contact
Maria Heil
National Press Coordinator
PRESS ONLY: 877-797-4857
E-mail: press@2asisters.org
==============================

SISTERS SUPPORT PILOTS

The Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) announced October 5 that a resolution in support of arming cockpit personnel on a voluntary basis was being circulated throughout its membership. The resolution calls for FBI training and federal licensing of pilots for purpose of carrying concealed weapons, and for the government to insure airlines and their employees against any legal action that might result from a justifiable self-defense incident. The ALPA, the United States' largest pilots' union, has asked its members to suspend air service if their proposals are not considered.

On September 27, President George W. Bush announced his administration's plans to bolster security measures at airports and on planes. The proposal provides nearly $500 million in funding to, among other things, strengthen cockpit doors, increase in the number of armed sky marshals on planes, and put the federal government in charge of training and screening airport workers.

The President fell short, however, of endorsing armed pilots on flights, saying, "There may be better ways to do it than that, but I'm open for any suggestion."

Second Amendment Sisters, the grassroots women's organization which supports the basic human right of self-defense, urges that airline pilots should have the option of arming themselves, in addition to the safety measures already being put in place across the United States. Not all pilots will be comfortable carrying a sidearm, and should not be forced to. But those who have expressed the desire to be armed, and who have the necessary training and skill, should be able to exercise their right to defend themselves and their passengers from an imminent threat. As has been proven time and time again across the United States, arming potential victims results in fewer completed crimes.

"Arming pilots would put in place a fail-safe method for preventing the use of an airliner as a weapon of mass destruction," states Maria Heil, SAS National Spokesperson.


TOPICS: Announcements; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
We definitely support the rights of pilots to protect not only themselves but all of us who fly!
1 posted on 10/09/2001 3:48:08 PM PDT by 2nd amendment mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama
Thanks for the post. Any idea why Bush opposes this?
2 posted on 10/09/2001 3:53:05 PM PDT by steenkeenbadges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SAS-MS;pro2A mom;technochick99;basil;the irate magistrate;Sussa
Bump
3 posted on 10/09/2001 3:53:15 PM PDT by 2nd amendment mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MightyMouth;Dan from Michigan;Joe Brower;68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub;Manny Festo;blam;bang_list
SASsy Self-Defense Bump
4 posted on 10/09/2001 3:55:30 PM PDT by 2nd amendment mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama
Thank you, Second Amendment Sisters!

Shall issue should be the law of the land!

5 posted on 10/09/2001 3:56:51 PM PDT by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama
Amen..............and, if I may, would like to re-offer my own humble suggestion made in a thread on 9/11:

Is It Time for a New "Concealed Carry" Category.........for Air Travel?

6 posted on 10/09/2001 4:03:01 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Standing Wolf
IMHO, Standing Wolf, "The Second Amendment should be the law of the land!"

Government cannot license a Constitutionally protected unalienable right!"

As History has demonstrated, once government asserts that power, the unalienable right is no more.

Vermont is a Second Amendment state. The other 49 are not!

"Shall Issue" be damned! What part of "shall not be infringed" do they not understand?

7 posted on 10/09/2001 4:12:41 PM PDT by Taxman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama, MightyMouth, the irate magistrate

Second Amendment Sisters, Inc.

8 posted on 10/09/2001 4:16:15 PM PDT by SAS-MS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: steenkeenbadges
President Bust doesn't oppose this per se, it's just some of the pilots do not want to be armed. They want to fly the plane and have Air Marshals and others do the protection of craft and passenger bit. I don't care either way, just provide real protection. Or let me carry my weapon on board!
9 posted on 10/09/2001 4:30:32 PM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama
Not all pilots will be comfortable carrying a sidearm, and should not be forced to. But those who have expressed the desire to be armed, and who have the necessary training and skill, should be able to exercise their right to defend themselves and their passengers from an imminent threat. As has been proven time and time again across the United States, arming potential victims results in fewer completed crimes.

10 posted on 10/09/2001 4:33:52 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taxman
"What part of "shall not be infringed" do they not understand?"

How Did the Founders Understand the Second Amendment?
11 posted on 10/09/2001 5:00:34 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Standing Wolf
Actually, "may carry" should be the law of the land!
12 posted on 10/09/2001 5:36:59 PM PDT by pro2A Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yoe
President Bust doesn't oppose this per se, it's just some of the pilots do not want to be armed. They want to fly the plane and have Air Marshals and others do the protection of craft and passenger bit.

One problem I could see would be if one of the pilots wants to be armed and the other doesn't. IMHO, any time one of the pilots leaves the cockpit the other pilot should keep his gun until he returns (so even if someone manages to jump the pilot who's outside the cockpit, cockpit security would not be compromised). If only one of the pilots is qualified to be armed, how could the other leave the cockpit safely?

13 posted on 10/09/2001 7:06:58 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SAS-MS,; 2nd amendment mama
Me Too!!
14 posted on 10/09/2001 8:09:42 PM PDT by the irate magistrate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Actually, many pilots DO want to be armed. Heck, many of them are former military, so I would hope they wouldn't be too wussy about guns.
15 posted on 10/09/2001 9:00:33 PM PDT by technochick99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
Those who have taken away our unalienable right to keep and bear arms bear at least some of the responsibility for the atrocities committed against America on 9-11.

Consider this: For the want of 4 handguns and 19 bullets, nearly 6,000 people died.

Thirty-five odd years ago, prior to the implementation of all these bogus "Security" operations and nationwide ban on concealed carry, Americans could travel with personal weapons, and were capable of providing for their own (and their fellow citizens) security.

Now, they are arrested while excercising their Second Amendment Rights, and cast in the press as villans.

This is progress?

“I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.”
[Thomas Jefferson, letter to Benjamin Rush, 1800.]

16 posted on 10/10/2001 7:46:58 AM PDT by Taxman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson