Skip to comments.
Middle East-OKC connection
David Schippers ^
| 10/21/01
| David Schippers/Geoff Metcalf
Posted on 10/26/2001 3:33:13 PM PDT by TaZ
"The same people did this (the towers) that did Oklahoma City,"
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Free Republic
KEYWORDS:
Do you think that the Government was really looking for a Middle Eastern Terrorist connection with Timothy McVeigh, or did they just find a scape-goat to mislead the American public with?
1
posted on
10/26/2001 3:33:13 PM PDT
by
TaZ
To: TaZ
Repeatable works well when verifying a theory or postulate in science.
Certain individuals within our governemnt and quite a few leftist media shills are *right now* trying to divert the blame for the anthrax mailings away from middle eastern terrorist onto home grown domestic terrorist (read right wing wackos). We have proof in the present day that shifting blame from islamic terrorist onto non-islamic americans is a motive of some. Just watched one of my local TV anchor babes state 'there still has been no definite connection between the events of 091101 and the anthrax attacks'. What about the letters in the anthrax attacks ? 09-11-01 written right at the top. Sorry, but anti-right wing media shills and there partners in crime within the various agencies of our government cannot deny that definite connection.
To: justa-hairyape
Actually, I work in the downtown Manhattan Court complex (which is about 4 blocks from Ground Zero) and I have an office in the Manhattan Federal Court Pressroom.
I must tell you, all of the morons around here (Court Security Officers, US Marshalls and Press bozos) pretty much think that some right-wing whacko is responsible for the Anthrax attacks.
As far as I can tell by the intelligence I've seen on this stuff, it is highly weaponized Anthrax of the sort only made in 3 places; Russia, Iraq and the USA.
I think we can rule out Russia
Do you think that the Liberal Establishments fears (paranoia) that Patriotic Americans will one day rise up and hold them accountable for their treasonist behavior has anything to do with why they are so quick to blame "Right-wing Militia types???"
Everytime one of these idiots opens their mouth and starts spewing their anti-militia vomit, I remind then it was the armed citizen Militia that rose up against Tyranny and founded this Country to begin with
They usually get frustrated and shut their yaps!
3
posted on
10/26/2001 4:02:57 PM PDT
by
TaZ
To: OKCSubmariner
FYI
To: TaZ
To: TaZ
Do you think that the Liberal Establishments fears (paranoia) that Patriotic Americans will one day rise up and hold them accountable for their treasonist behavior has anything to do with why they are so quick to blame "Right-wing Militia types???"BINGO!!!!!
Bump
To: concerned about politics
Do you think that the Liberal Establishments fears (paranoia) that Patriotic Americans will one day rise up and hold them accountable for their treasonist behavior has anything to do with why they are so quick to blame "Right-wing Militia types???"What makes all this blaming of the right so vile is that fact that Left wing anti-Capitalists are the ones actually doing it.
It's called "shifting the blame."
Bill taught them how to do it.
To: TaZ
According to Schippers in the interview, the quote you used there was from Naval Intelligence. The interview is frustratingly short of elaboration, but it's interesting indeed.
8
posted on
10/26/2001 5:28:26 PM PDT
by
Twodees
To: Twodees
OK, here's another interview of Schippers that also has some interesting info.
Schippers is currently engaging radio interviews in an attempt to get this info to the American sheeple, because as you can imagine, the Power Elite are trying to suppress these facts.
David Schippers Interview Transcript No. 2
Hope someone else here can come up with some additional David Schippers material.
9
posted on
10/26/2001 5:57:20 PM PDT
by
TaZ
To: TaZ
Thanks for the link. I've been very interested in a ME connection to OKC for quite awhile now.
10
posted on
10/26/2001 6:26:56 PM PDT
by
Twodees
To: Twodees
http://www.disaster.net/historical/ok/suspect2.gif
This is a comparison Of John Doe No.2 to Muhhamed Atta
11
posted on
10/27/2001 1:03:13 AM PDT
by
TaZ
To: TaZ
12
posted on
10/27/2001 1:11:57 AM PDT
by
TaZ
To: TaZ
13
posted on
10/27/2001 2:55:34 PM PDT
by
TaZ
To: TaZ
The only thing that's wrong is the angle of the eyebrows. This is odd, because many of the more complicated details (nose shape, jaw shape, etc.) are a perfect match. It could be that the artist did not pay much attention or took the word "arched" to be a different type of arch. Or it could be that Atta had shaved or plucked his brows so that they did not have what was evidently their original shape, thicker and higher at the front than towards the end. Just an idea.
14
posted on
10/27/2001 3:04:40 PM PDT
by
livius
To: livius
It is obvious that Atta had a mono brow. The most recent pic makes it obvious too that he shaved or plucked it, probably to look more Western and less Middle-Eastern. It is also probable that he has lost weight since 1995.
15
posted on
10/28/2001 9:54:35 AM PST
by
TaZ
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson