Posted on 11/8/2001, 5:02:43 PM by Alkhin
Hollywood, as we have heard, has been frantically airbrushing images of the World Trade Center out of its movie trailersand hastily reviewing all scripts. Bombs have to go, and airplane adventures, and anything mocking. Even a romantic comedy set in New York, Serendipity, directed by Peter Chelsom, has had its release postponed. The phrase "bad timing" is doubtless ricocheting through the canyons of Southern California.
Yet there is one film, set for release in December, that has such good timing it will almost certainly break box-office records. That would be The Fellowship of the Ring, the first film in director Peter Jackson's much-anticipated Lord of the Rings trilogy.
The mythic landscape of J.R.R. Tolkien's fantasy epic, where a coalition of hobbits, men, dwarves and elves battle the strengthening evil of Sauron in the land of Mordor, has amazing resonance in the aftermath of Sept. 11.
Indeed, when the towers fell in Manhattan, I immediately envisioned myself as a plump, pie-loving hobbit in the sunlit shire around Hobbiton, roused to unwelcome adventure by the spectres of darkness, who had finally crossed the bridge over the sparkling river Brandywine.
Canadians are very much like hobbits, I think, with our peaceable, good-hearted, sedentary lifestyles, our green fields and warm homes, our aversion to the distant drumbeats of war. We aren't supposed to smoke pipes, as hobbits do, and we don't have furred feet. But otherwise, the image is fitting, as is the sudden appearance of what Tolkien calls the "Black Riders," faceless wraiths who ride into the shire, their evil magnified by its totally unexpected presence in such a serene environment.
Men of homicidal intent inquiring politely after farmers' crop-dusters? What better mythic embodiment of such a sinister phenomenon than the Black Riders gliding through the shire?
Tolkien was preoccupied with the idea of evil as a shadow -- treacherous and intangible. The ring makes its wearer invisible, and corrupts them. Middle Earth is full of spies, like the birds who wheel overhead. The author also believed in the inherent goodness of humankind, which finds its courage and pools its talents and, in that way, prevails against darkness.
In the current diplomacy, where unlikely allies are assembling with their separate and distinct strengths, Tolkien's world is a perfect metaphor. Canadians are hobbits; Americans are, I don't know, the embattled men of Gandor, say. The Russians are the mighty mountain dwarves. Kofi Annan of the United Nations can be Gandalf, let's pretend, and the Europeans get to be the elves. The Afghans are the ents. The terrorists, of course, are a bunch of stinking, barking orcs and faceless riders. My ex-boyfriend could be Gollum.
But I digress into personal reverie ... We have, here, a master narrative for our terror and the necessity of vanquishing it. As novelist Robert Stone wrote in last week's New York Times Magazine, this "new war" is a contest of myths: "The unreality we experienced on Sept. 11 was of something fictive," he wrote. "The internal narrative of our enemies, their absolute ruthless devotion to an invisible world, makes them strong. Our system, too, is a state of mind. We need to find in [our stories] the elements that will serve our actual survival."
The question, which can't be answered until Dec. 19, is whether director Peter Jackson has relayed this myth in a manner that complements our own imaginations. I've seen the trailer and I was disappointed that Frodo Baggins, played by young actor Elijah Wood, looked so pretty.
Hobbits never had high cheekbones, for God's sake -- not in the way I imagined them. They were jolly and goofy, self-effacing and stout-hearted. They loved their cakes and ale, but could ultimately summon great courage in saving their beloved world from certain doom. They weren't good-looking boys with huge prosthetic feet.
Likewise, the inimitable actor Sir Ian McKellen plays Gandalf, which is fine, except that he doesn't look a bit like Kofi Annan, or whomever each one of us chooses to imagine Gandalf to be. The function of myth is to provide a structure for our dreams and anxieties, which we then build upon in our own peculiar ways. That basic truth wound up trouncing the earlier, animated version of Lord of the Rings, made in 1978 by Ralph Bakshi. (Rumour has it that Warner will be releasing this version on DVD soon.)
Jackson has done some exceptional work as a director. His 1994 film, Heavenly Creatures, starring Kate Winslet, was a wholly original riff on the true story of how two New Zealand schoolgirls talked one another into committing a murder. He received an Academy Award nomination for the screenplay.
His cadre of actors include Cate Blanchett, Liv Tyler, Sir Ian Holm and Sir Ian McKellen, all of whom have already played their parts in the entire three-film shoot in New Zealand, with the films scheduled to be released annually.
I know the article is old, but since there has been such a furor lately of this upcoming movie (not to mention that I am a HUGE and LONGTIME lover of all things hobbitish, elvish, and ringish), I thought this article interesting and wanted to share....because her MAIN point is exactly how I will be looking at it when I go see it: how salient the set-up will be to our own positions in this flow of history.
She also writes: I've seen the trailer and I was disappointed that Frodo Baggins, played by young actor Elijah Wood, looked so pretty. They weren't good-looking boyswith huge prosthetic feet.
THANK GOD FOR THAT!!! There was an article on another site of Warwick Davis ("Willow") complaining that he wasnt cast. Sorry, but I happen to believe that even young hobbits in the prime of their lives would be goodlooking and virile...not shrunken and dwarvish. Elijah Wood is BEAUTIFUL...and as such fits the role of Frodo PERFECTLY...he was named 'elf-friend' after all!
Anyway, My $00.02 worth...
Don't feel too bad about publishing an old story -- it was published on my birthday.
The trailers for LOTR are thrilling, and I can't wait to see the movie.
LTS
Kofi Annan of the United Nations can be Gandalf...
That line alone is a five-alarm insult to Gandalf the Grey.
Great Stuff!! Last time I read Tolkien was 30 years ago.
WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!! I can't stand it...best friend and I have already told our hubbys..."you will have to sit in another part of the theater...we WILL embarrass you by our drooling!" LOL
Well, if she had left off this Kofi Annan as Gandalf c*** I might have enjoyed the article. However, this line suggests the article needs a
Shalom.
I don't know any of Wood's work and I don't expect it to upset me too much when I watch the movie. But Frodo isn't a kid - he's 50 years old when he goes on his adventure. What's wrong with letting the elderly show their strength?
That said, the trailor is outstanding!
Shalom.
Here's a photo of Pippin and Merry, the two playboys of the group....makes you wonder just what it was they got into THIS time!
Fool of a Took! (and Brandybuck)
He would be correct to if he cast Kofi as the evil wizard Saruman.
That's because Hobbits live to be about 115 yrs old...50 is old in human terms, but not hobbit...think about it: if human average lifespan was 115 years, the old ideas of being over the hill at 40 would be laughable.
No Frodo et al are in the PRIME of life...and their youth and unattachment to any settled life should show it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.