Free Republic 4th Quarter Fundraising Target: $88,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $32,005
Woo hoo!! And the first 36% is in!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Posts by butterdezillion

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • O'Keefe created the fake bank in Belize and Woodhouse and Clinton are implicated in taking foreign d

    10/25/2016 11:19:11 PM PDT · 85 of 117
    butterdezillion to Bullish

    A lot of us were questioning reality yesterday when we realized we were agreeing with Michael Moore and Roseanne Barr. There are some very strange bedfellows this election. But I think that’s what happens when those who have been deceived are allowed to see the truth. There’s probably a lot that we don’t agree on, but those with any integrity at all are appalled by the lawlessness. It was the lawlessness that I saw back in 2009-2010 that got me to speak out. Now that others are seeing the lawlessness for themselves it’s not a subject for ridicule any more. All I can say is, “Welcome to reality, friends. Let all of us who support the rule of law stand together against this beast!”

  • FOX News Reporter: Seeing Trump Rally Crowds "How Could He Possibly Be Losing?" (VIDEO)

    10/25/2016 11:08:15 PM PDT · 37 of 75
    butterdezillion to Helicondelta

    lol! I love it!

  • O'Keefe created the fake bank in Belize and Woodhouse and Clinton are implicated in taking foreign d

    10/25/2016 10:57:17 PM PDT · 78 of 117
    butterdezillion to Bullish

    The more the media obfuscates, the more they are seen for what they are. If you want some encouragement, listen to Michael Moore’s audio (it was posted here yesterday, I think). It seems like he is realizing that the whole stinking system is corrupt and screwing the normal people. That system includes a corrupt media. He said Trump was going to win in the biggest “FU” ever and it was going to feel good. Said the people whose lives have been sold out by the machine have one thing left that they can do: vote. And they will. He says the people voting for Trump are just normal people who have been screwed by the corrupt system - not racists.

    See, there’s eventually a tipping point. The media can ignore so much but there’s that one straw that breaks the camel’s back, and people begin to see what’s really going on. When the “true believers” reach that tipping point they become the strongest fighters against those who deceived them and broke their trust. Julian Assange is a leftist, but when the supposed shoe-in for US POTUS suggests the military drone you it somehow puts things into much clearer focus. Seeing how the media, DNC, and Obama regime are all one entity changes a person’s view of all three - even for a leftist like Assange. And he’s come out with fists swinging.

    The media can ignore all they want, but they are simply turning up the burner under the pressure cooker. Those who are willing to see will still see, and some - many, according to Michael Moore - will realize just how badly the whole corrupt system is screwing us all. And they will fight.

  • They've been busy at Reddit. Lookey what they found...

    10/25/2016 4:24:45 PM PDT · 37 of 48
    butterdezillion to Revel


  • Trump's election will be the biggest "[bleep] You" in human history - Michael Moore

    10/24/2016 6:44:44 PM PDT · 36 of 113
    butterdezillion to BigEdLB

    Seems like he’s realizing that it’s the machine versus all the rest of us. He may be one of the leftists who got mugged - the kind of person who would be lined up and shot first come communist revolution, according to Yuri Bezmenov. Those who truly believe in leftism, when they see how it really works, are disillusioned, turn on it, and become the strongest fighters. Seems like Assange is one of those. If Michael Moore is one, I will happily stand beside him. I’m sure there’s not much we’d agree on, but in this audio clip it does seem like he understands that the machine is screwing all of us.


    10/24/2016 4:25:03 PM PDT · 15 of 26
    butterdezillion to Sean_Anthony; musicman

    I was thinking about this at work today. I’m not artsy, but I would love to see a cartoon like this:

    Frame One: Hillary in front of the presstitutes saying “Seventeen intelligence agencies say the Russians are behind the Wikileaks hack” (Note: cartoonist’s “eye” is looking at the backs of “reporters” as they listen to Hillary who is facing them. On their notebooks are their press credentials (names) and the times of their appointments to plan with Podesta...)

    Frame Two: Flash to representatives of the “17 intel agencies in a group, looking at an envelope labeled (with all letters cut out from magazines’) as “Hacked Emails”, with a return address saying FROM RUSSIA. FBI should be represented by James Comey in a t-shirt that says “LAWS ARE FOR LITTLE PEOPLE”, NSA should say “I’M WITH HER”, etc. The group as a whole says in lock-step: “It looks like it’s from Russia!”

    FRAME 3: Back to Hillary saying, “Because the integrity of US elections is so important (have an imagination bubble where she remembers bused-in fraudulent voters, paying bimbos to lie, suggesting that Assange be droned, etc), I as an experienced diplomat will respond with the temperament such a serious threat demands...”

    FRAME 4: Show crazy Joe Biden in clown outfit rolling his eyes and sticking out his tongue right next to Hillary as she says, “We will execute a top-secret cyber-attack to embarrass the pants off of Vladimir Putin”.

    FRAME 5: Pan right from Biden and Hillary so they can be seen as very tiny (still sticking out their tongues) and show Russian nuclear-armed subs in the Atlantic off our coast with a muscular and VERY NOT AMUSED Putin watching.



    10/24/2016 3:26:10 AM PDT · 82 of 152
    butterdezillion to Scott from the Left Coast

    Soros said that he expects Trump to win the popular vote by a landslide but to lose the electoral vote. To me that says that they will use the same scheme that got Obama his second term: cheat in the heavily-democrat precincts of critical toss-up states. Either that, or bribe electors to vote against their popular vote winner.

    I only read the headline, but it said that Trump’s people say they’re losing. I presume that would be in the electoral votes. Poll-watchers will be critical. And especially to get video footage of suspected foul play, such as poll-watchers being kicked out and boxes of ballots being brought in.

  • Trump vows to sue all female accusers as 11th woman steps forward

    10/24/2016 3:11:37 AM PDT · 40 of 74
    butterdezillion to Ulysse

    James O’Keefe strongly implied that he’s got content directly linking Hillary to the attempts to incite violence at Trump rallies - saying there’s a reason she didn’t deny Trump’s charge to that effect in the debate.

    We know that Trump has been in contact with O’Keefe, since O’Keefe was his guest at the debate. And we know that Trump also accused Hillary of getting these women to accuse him - which Hillary also did not deny.

    I suspect that O’Keefe may have something that directly ties Hillary to these women’s charges. That would certainly give him content to use in a lawsuit alleging that the claims were both false and malicious. And it would give him grounds to sue Clinton as well, even if she is elected.

    The threat of a suit could be Trump letting these women know they would do better to expose Hillary now than to go to jail with her later.

  • Why I Now Feel Compelled To Vote For Trump

    10/23/2016 6:04:13 AM PDT · 25 of 79
    butterdezillion to proudpapa

    Yes. And it needs to be done without any snark or belittling of the people we need on board. We need to make it as easy as possible for pride to be set aside and all lovers of America to come together. Too much is at stake.

  • PHOTO: Heavily armed 'police' appear outside Ecuadorian Embassy in London where Julian..

    10/21/2016 10:26:12 AM PDT · 63 of 172
    butterdezillion to Freedom of Speech Wins

    I didn’t see that. Do you have a link?

    I think that would prove that Hillary was NOT “joking” when she asked if they couldn’t just drone Assange.

    And if that’s the case - as Assange’s sources (who were obviously there at the meeting where she said it) told him - then the US public needs to know that they are considering electing somebody who would use the US military to drone attack anybody who opposes her.

    Wikileaks exposed that the dems are using a shell company to try to frame Assange as a pedophile. Reddit posters found corroborating evidence also, and in response to the Reddit investigation, the head of that goup tweeted that they have control over all the drones in the world and would hit the Redditors. Right after somebody noted that on Reddit this dem operative locked his Twitter account. I commented on that in an earlier thread. That sounds a lot like Hillary, with whom he was photographed. And it doesn’t sound like a “joke” - especially if the democrat powers-that-be are trying to designate Assange as a terrorist so they CAN drone strike him as Hillary tersely suggested in the meeting, in the presence of people who then went to Assange with it...

  • PHOTO: Heavily armed 'police' appear outside Ecuadorian Embassy in London where Julian..

    10/21/2016 9:50:21 AM PDT · 43 of 172
    butterdezillion to Buckeye McFrog

    British posters on twitter said the cops do NOT normally have guns.

    But if this photo was taken Tuesday, then what’s going on with Assange today? Has anybody seen him? Do we know if he is safe?

  • “The Terrorist Threat against U.S. has Never Been Greater” says Johns Hopkins Lecturer

    10/21/2016 8:25:58 AM PDT · 4 of 10
    butterdezillion to Academiadotorg

    It was in January of 2010 that Obama told the Egyptian ambassador that he was and still is a Muslim who supports the Muslim agenda, and that the Muslim world should be patient with him while he got Obamacare passed and then he would focus attention on the Islamic agenda. That was one of the few promises that Obama has ever kept, because once Obamacare was passed Obama turned his attention to ousting our anti-jihad allies in the Middle East, installing Muslim Brotherhood regimes instead.

    The Muslim Brotherhood was founded by a couple guys in the first half of the last century who saw that Islamic governments had been dissolved and the lands incorporated into European territories. These men said that Muslims were becoming peaceful citizens of these non-Islamic nations/territories and were forgetting that Islam is supposed to conquer the world and establish a worldwide Islamic caliphate. These men started an organization to return Muslim back to the Quran, so Muslims would realize they are NOT to peacefully co-exist with their non-Muslim neighbors and governments. They are to subvert and overtake them.

    The Muslim Brotherhood is the parent organization to EVERY jihadist organization there is. And that is the group that Obama’s brother, Obama himself, Huma ABedin and her family, etc ALL bow down to and serve.

    It is NO ACCIDENT that terrorism spiked in 2011. It was what Obama promised the Egyptian ambassador in January of 2010.

    The question at this juncture is when the American public will realize that 2008 was a coup to install a foreign enemy combatant into our White House, and that figurehead who was “elected” has allowed all our agencies to be filled with people who will bow to the agenda of Obama/Hillary’s owners. And whether it is too late for us to fight back.

    God help us! Amen!

  • Drudge: Feds Warn 'Hackers' Could 'Fake' Election Fraud...

    10/21/2016 8:12:03 AM PDT · 57 of 90
    butterdezillion to tbw2

    Which is ironic considering that the big media hype yesterday was how un-American Trump is for saying he wouldn’t accept an election decided by proven fraud.

    Now they’re reserving the right to do the same thing.

    But they’ll still claim that Trump was bad for doing it and they’re good for doing it. They just admitted that Trump had the smarter position, which they tried to dupe the public into thinking was evil. Now that they saw their dupe didn’t work they are trying to get the same bargaining position that Trump wisely chose in the first place.

    These people would be pathetic if they weren’t so evil. And it would all be laughable if there weren’t so many deceived, stupid, and/or evil people to keep these idiots in power.

  • Drudge: Feds Warn 'Hackers' Could 'Fake' Election Fraud...

    10/21/2016 8:04:30 AM PDT · 45 of 90
    butterdezillion to BigEdLB

    lol. I needed a laugh.

    It’s probably not far from the truth though.

  • Drudge: Feds Warn 'Hackers' Could 'Fake' Election Fraud...

    10/21/2016 7:55:18 AM PDT · 12 of 90
    butterdezillion to MNDude

    This is what happens when Trump says he will not let fraud go unchallenged.

    Transparent. Very transparent.

    First they try saying Trump is anti-American because he says he would challenge fraud. Then they say hackers could create fake fraud (without ever saying hackers could also create REAL fraud).

    We need to do the Afghanistan verification - indelible purple ink. Paper ballots. Observers from both parties in every precinct, with video cameras constantly rolling. Voter ID, as even the UN observers last time said our elections are questionable because we require no voter ID.

  • WikiLeaks: Wyss Foundation Democracy Strategy Discussion Memo

    10/21/2016 7:44:38 AM PDT · 9 of 11
    butterdezillion to UCANSEE2

    That’s your theory, right?

    What do we KNOW about his current situation? Has he been seen at the Ecuador embassy?

  • WikiLeaks: Wyss Foundation Democracy Strategy Discussion Memo

    10/21/2016 7:25:42 AM PDT · 7 of 11
    butterdezillion to butterdezillion

    And I read some Wikileaks tweets saying/suggesting that they know Hillary will win (makes me wonder what else they have that convinces them of that - maybe info about stealing the election...) but what is wrong about exposing the corruption of the regime about to take control?

    The photo said to be Assange’s “last message” - him holding a sign saying “KEEP FIGHTING” - suggests that this is about more than just an election.

    And it is. It’s about across-the-board corruption and control, versus the checks and balances that are supposed to insure that justice and truth prevail. Unless and until we have people in Congress and the administrations/agencies who are held to account for their oaths of office, we are GUARANTEED to have tyranny.

    Why are our elected officials in DC and in the states dead silent on all the crimes being committed to try to get Hillary elected?

    WE all know that the AG and FBI are a sick joke. How did they get that way? Who voted to approve these political hacks to be in control of such critical positions? And why are they not moving to impeach?

    When I first started posting about Obama’s documentation issues it was not about Obama, and I said that flat-out. It was about a corrupt, criminal system which, if left unchecked, would destroy this nation. What we’re seeing now vindicates me and a bunch of others who have been saying the same thing for a long time. We were mocked, we were told we were an embarrassing distraction... but what we said has been proven right. The people who would not see what we said back then are STILL not seeing it, even when Assange and O’Keefe point it out in black and white before their very eyes.

    The media/”conservative” argument that called us “crazy conspiracists” has demoralized a large portion of the American public, and that’s not going to go away suddenly even if Trump can pull off this election and still be inaugurated (which is another big “if” considering that Obama/Hillary are doing their level best to start a nuclear war with Russia).

    The battle is truly with the American mind - a mind that has forgotten the warnings of our Founders, about diligence and accountability being the CRITICAL INGREDIENTS for the continuation of this nation.


  • WikiLeaks: Wyss Foundation Democracy Strategy Discussion Memo

    10/21/2016 7:08:13 AM PDT · 3 of 11
    butterdezillion to Oldeconomybuyer

    Conmbine this with the email saying they want to keep the electorate dumbed-down, and you’ve got a plot to force uninformed voters to vote. The greatest enemy this nation faces is ignorant, stupid, and/or corrupt voters (or fraud that creates out of thin air the votes that ignorant, stupid, and/or corrupt voters would make.

    This is an assault on our country. It goes back to Cloward-Piven. They’re trying to implement Cloward-Piven’s plan, which was to destroy the USA and turn it communist.

    People need to see the connections.

    I know that Assange is a leftist, but I think he may be one who has been forced to wake up - the very kind of person the KGB would execute first come communist revolution (according to KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov) because once they see what communism really is, they FIGHT BACK HARD. And I can’t help but wonder if that’s exactly what has happened with Assange.

    I hope he’s still alive.

  • The Brutal Truth (on the A.Smith dinner)

    10/21/2016 7:00:26 AM PDT · 20 of 72
    butterdezillion to MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

    I wonder how many of these people even knew what Trump was talking about. If they rely on the MSM they live in a different world and probably don’t even know that Hillary wants her regime to force an “Arab Spring” alteration of Catholic theology.

    They used to talk about “two Americas” - the haves and the have-nots. That may be true, but what they have or don’t have is factual knowledge. Many, many people live in the alternate reality staged by the Propaganda Ministry.

    This analysis is excellent. Every Catholic should read it, if not every American.

  • WikiLeaks claims sham U.S. firm is trying to smear Assange

    10/21/2016 6:47:56 AM PDT · 11 of 14
    butterdezillion to butterdezillion

    Soloff’s tweet claimed they have control of all the world’s drones and threatened to use them on those investigating his ties to these false smears - which involve the UN, after this ToddandClaire group received some kind of UN award for protecting women (who has the connections to get a company an award from the UN?)

    That sounds way, way different from the Soloff quote in the original article posted in this thread:

    ““Premise is not associated with, has never had dealings with, and has no knowledge of T&C Network Solutions,” Soloff said in an email. “This all appears to tie back to mistaken internet information about a previous office address (645 7th St.) Premise occupied through August 2015 before we outgrew the space and moved to our current San Francisco offices.”

    “We have no professional or donor affiliation with any political candidate,” Soloff added. “The picture you refer to was taken at a speaking event near Washington, DC in January or February 2016. I was offered an opportunity to say hello to the candidate and I did so!”

    Read more here:

  • WikiLeaks claims sham U.S. firm is trying to smear Assange

    10/21/2016 6:36:13 AM PDT · 10 of 14
    butterdezillion to mojitojoe

    The head of this Premise group that seems to have set up this ToddandClaire thing to falsely accuse Assange locked his Twitter account after responding to a Reddit investigator that they control all the drones in the world and would send them to the Redittors.

    A lot like Hillary. And the Wikileaks sources who were apparently at the meeting where Hillary suggested droning Assange said she was definitely NOT joking.

    For Wikileaks to even know about the comment - which Hillary confirmed as accurate by claiming it was a joke - they had to have sources who were there. IOW, inside sources. And they know that Hillary was serious about wanting to drone Assange.

    And now this democrat group trying to falsely accuse Assange has had their head Tweet the same thing - don’t worry, we’ll drone you. That’s claiming they control the US military and can use the US military to target civilians for sheerly political purposes.

    I think this whole thing is what the general public needs to understand. THESE CROOKS ARE DANGEROUS TO EVERYONE! If Hillary gets in, there is no stopping ANYTHING they decide to do.

  • VANITY: IT Experts Please Help Sort Out Intel Claims of Russian Hack

    10/21/2016 5:51:11 AM PDT · 68 of 69
    butterdezillion to FredZarguna

    Would the NSA have to do it in real time or could they do it after the communication was already sent?

  • Airline Pilot Tries To Punish A U.S. Air Force Soldier. He Didn't Expect THIS To Happen

    10/20/2016 5:53:58 PM PDT · 35 of 64
    butterdezillion to Donglalinger

    But it got me to belly laugh so who cares? =)

  • James O'Keefe tweets 1 hour ago about audio of WH with Creamer; hints Donna Brazile involvement

    10/20/2016 5:39:22 PM PDT · 88 of 147
    butterdezillion to hardspunned

    I can’t remember who he was responding to, but I saw him tweet that some “news” (ha!) entity needed to correct their libel or he would sue them. Methinks he can be more swift to threaten such things if he knows that Trump would help finance a lawyer if necessary...

  • James O'Keefe tweets 1 hour ago about audio of WH with Creamer; hints Donna Brazile involvement

    10/20/2016 5:31:39 PM PDT · 80 of 147
    butterdezillion to WilliamCooper1

    Hillary Clinton skirted the questions about “pay to play” and about inciting violence at Trump’s rallies.

    And Trump noted that. Hopefully the viewership did too...

  • Woman Backtracks on Assault Claim After O’Keefe Video

    10/20/2016 5:13:27 PM PDT · 22 of 68
    butterdezillion to gaijin

    Keep in mind that Scott Foval said he was “the white hat”. This is the peanuts part of the story. Creamer is the “diabolical” one - the “black hat”.

    What all kind of crap did the “black hat” do? What “shit” did they get mentally ill people do - as opposed to the rabble-rousing stuff that the SEIU folks were always ready to do at the asking?

    In a couple recent posts I’ve looked at the months running up to Jared Loughner’s shooting of Judge John Roll (a critical person who would have judged the constitutionality of AZ’s potential law to require a long-form birth certificate to get on the Presidential ballot there). On Nov 4th a democratic strategist suggested that Obama needed “another Oklahoma City” (bombing) type event to pull the country together. Creamer visited the White HOuse on Nov 11th, with the secretary of Obama’s “fixer” and 6 other people. Shortly after that Loughner became violent, buying the gun on Nov 30th.

    Does that sound like the kind of “shit” a “diabolical” “black hat” would get a mentally ill person to do for the democrats?

  • Why Did Vote-Rigging Robert Creamer Visit The White House Over 200 Times During The Obama Admin

    10/20/2016 5:02:18 PM PDT · 105 of 106
    butterdezillion to butterdezillion

    On Nov 4th Mark Penn - strategist for Hillary Clinton - suggested that Obama needed another “Oklahoma City” to pull the country together (see ). Creamer made an appointment on Nov 10th for a meeting the next day with Kristin Sheehy (”fixer” Messina’s secretary) and 7 other people.

    Nov 30th Jared Loughner - already well-established as being mentally unstable - buys a gun and starts talking violently.

    I want to look at the records that say when he started acting like he was hearing voices and getting into the mind control stuff.

    There was another mentally ill person at the shooting also, who also was into mind control stuff.

    According to , it seems like he got violent around that time.

    This whole thing makes me sad. These jerks talking about exploiting mental illness in order to serve their own political purposes is sick, sick, sick!

    I wonder if O’Keefe’s people ever asked what kind of “shit” they got mentally ill people to do for them. They already said that provoking violence, etc was stuff the SEIU people were always willing to do at the drop of a hat. Must be some other kind of “shit” that the mentally ill people were supposed to do. And how many mentally ill people committed acts of mass violence from 2010-2012? How many of them had connections to the DNC mafia machine that O’Keefe uncovered?

    Another thing. Hillary admitted that she said the “Can’t we just drone him?” comment about Assange, by saying it was just a joke. Wikileaks knew about that comment - presumably from somebody who was there and heard it, and what they told Wikileaks is that it was NOT a joke. The persons who reported that to Wikileaks may well have realized that Hillary is a madwoman at the head of a murderous cabal. They may be the leakers. What would be tremendously sad is if those people had the courage to confront this beast, risking EVERYTHING - and stupid people like Marco Rubio will pooh-pooh the whole thing.

    These people are not doing “just politics”. They are DESTROYING PEOPLE’S LIVES.

  • VANITY: IT Experts Please Help Sort Out Intel Claims of Russian Hack

    10/19/2016 11:02:32 PM PDT · 47 of 69
    butterdezillion to TBP

    The emails that the NSA has, the emails that Wikileaks has, or both?

  • VANITY: IT Experts Please Help Sort Out Intel Claims of Russian Hack

    10/19/2016 10:55:32 PM PDT · 46 of 69
    butterdezillion to TBP


  • VANITY: IT Experts Please Help Sort Out Intel Claims of Russian Hack

    10/19/2016 10:34:36 PM PDT · 41 of 69
    butterdezillion to Celerity

    Are you able to tell a techno-idiot like me how it really did go down, and how you know it went down that way?

    And I do mean “able”, because my son is a techno-stud and sometimes he tries explaining things but there’s just too much to unpack, so I understand if it’s not possible.

  • VANITY: IT Experts Please Help Sort Out Intel Claims of Russian Hack

    10/19/2016 10:31:05 PM PDT · 40 of 69
    butterdezillion to Foundahardheadedwoman

    I agree.

    But they’re sure trying hard to start a war with Russia...

    Trump did a good job of pointing out that if they really wanted to defeat ISIS in Mosul they would not have announced all they were doing 3 weeks ahead of time. It was obviously theatrics. And the same thing is true with their saying they were going to do a “covert” cyber-attack to embarrass Putin. These people are poking Putin’s eyes, just asking for a fight.

    I hope Americans are able to see how easily this regime makes us little people the sacrificial lambs, for the sake of their political power.

  • (Vanity) Hillary was READING from real time info.

    10/19/2016 10:19:26 PM PDT · 61 of 100
    butterdezillion to moehoward

    I was waiting for Trump to slam her hard on the “Trump promotes violence at his rallies” thing. I about hit the ceiling when I heard her say that!

  • VANITY: IT Experts Please Help Sort Out Intel Claims of Russian Hack

    10/19/2016 10:01:12 PM PDT · 35 of 69
    butterdezillion to Mr. M.J.B.

    Do you think that a lot of IT people in the country would have the same reaction?

  • VANITY: IT Experts Please Help Sort Out Intel Claims of Russian Hack

    10/19/2016 9:59:57 PM PDT · 34 of 69
    butterdezillion to smokingfrog

    Just wanting to know the truth is dangerous to a person’s health/freedom these days.

    The NSA Hacks everybody every day. Everything is their business and they alone are to be trusted with the truth. Scary.

  • Despite Lack of Media Coverage, Damning Veritas Video Is Top Trend on YouTube

    10/19/2016 9:40:12 PM PDT · 46 of 48
    butterdezillion to gaijin

    Keep talking; the media farce is depressing and an encouraging word is really helpful.

  • VANITY: IT Experts Please Help Sort Out Intel Claims of Russian Hack

    10/19/2016 9:37:56 PM PDT · 29 of 69
    butterdezillion to Cvengr

    What I fear is an American public that either doesn’t care or has no way to enforce its will in the face of fraud. Even the Russians could not damage Hillary if Americans are too stupid to open their eyes.

    I’m praying a lot. I think we’re in a terrible mess and the Lord is really the only intervention that can save us from ourselves.

  • VANITY: IT Experts Please Help Sort Out Intel Claims of Russian Hack

    10/19/2016 9:28:40 PM PDT · 26 of 69
    butterdezillion to rlbedfor

    The Amtrak wifi suggests it was an inside job? Did you see the email where Chelsea said the guy who did the server put spyware on? But that would be Hillary’s emails, not Podesta’s, right? The hack associated with Amtrak wifi is the Wikileaks hack, right?

    Has anything come of anonymous, who claimed they had Hillary’s deleted emails?

  • VANITY: IT Experts Please Help Sort Out Intel Claims of Russian Hack

    10/19/2016 9:26:02 PM PDT · 24 of 69
    butterdezillion to SisterK

    My 16-year-old daughter was on the fence but after the debate we discussed Hillary’s lies and what it all means and she is now strongly in favor of Trump.

  • VANITY: IT Experts Please Help Sort Out Intel Claims of Russian Hack

    10/19/2016 9:23:37 PM PDT · 22 of 69
    butterdezillion to Mr. M.J.B.

    What is “IC”?

    I was wondering about the integrity of the group. From what people here are saying it sounds like anybody credible would not even claim to be able to track a hack done by those who can frame somebody else. Makes me wonder if IT people all over the country are rolling their eyes at these claims.

  • VANITY: IT Experts Please Help Sort Out Intel Claims of Russian Hack

    10/19/2016 9:20:28 PM PDT · 20 of 69
    butterdezillion to old curmudgeon

    The exposure of the absolute corruption is encouraging.

    But then, it is discouraging that even in the face of all this evidence, the American public by and large doesn’t care. Nor do the politicians. It’s all a shake-down. Everybody in it for him/herself.

    I vacillate between hope/fight and disgust/hopelessness over the fate of America. This election is a judgment of America’s people. Either we will care about the truth, or we will die at our own hands. Nerve-wracking.

  • Hillary: All 17 of our security agencies say that Russia hacked our national computer systems

    10/19/2016 9:15:37 PM PDT · 73 of 124
    butterdezillion to Talisker

    That fits what I’ve suspected for a while. My suspicion is that Iran will be Russia’s proxy, and it may be an EMP they use. And that may be what Obama/Hillary’s owners (the Islamists) have intended all along - the reason they illegally put Obama into our White HOuse in the 2008 coup.

    For their part, I think Russia would hold off if Trump won. I think the Russians are NOT on the side of the Islamists and realize the whole world would be aflame if the Islamists CONTINUE to control the US. The US is a primary creator, enabler, funder, arm-er, and exporter (and importer) of ISIS. Trump made that point well tonight, and people are idiots if they ignore that fact. Russia is not ignoring that fact.

  • Hillary: All 17 of our security agencies say that Russia hacked our national computer systems

    10/19/2016 9:07:42 PM PDT · 62 of 124
    butterdezillion to MikeNJ

    And some of the same agencies that deleted information on “known terrorists”?

  • Hillary: All 17 of our security agencies say that Russia hacked our national computer systems

    10/19/2016 9:06:10 PM PDT · 59 of 124
    butterdezillion to HapaxLegamenon

    But so does Trump, right?

    But Trump isn’t buying it.

  • Hillary: All 17 of our security agencies say that Russia hacked our national computer systems

    10/19/2016 9:04:45 PM PDT · 51 of 124
    butterdezillion to Talisker

    So do you think the info used in this analysis is fake, or do you think the leaker attempted to frame the Russians, or what?

  • VANITY: IT Experts Please Help Sort Out Intel Claims of Russian Hack

    10/19/2016 9:02:28 PM PDT · 11 of 69
    butterdezillion to ConservativeMind

    Amtrak - so that was done in the US? Somebody inside the US helped get the leaks to Wikileaks? I’m so stupid on this stuff. How would they have a France IP address using an open WiFi connection on Amtrak?

  • VANITY: IT Experts Please Help Sort Out Intel Claims of Russian Hack

    10/19/2016 9:00:18 PM PDT · 10 of 69
    butterdezillion to ConservativeMind

    So pretty much any hacker could have gotten Podesta’s emails, given the open WiFi connection? Or what is the significance of the open Wifi connection on Amtrak?

  • VANITY: IT Experts Please Help Sort Out Intel Claims of Russian Hack

    10/19/2016 8:58:26 PM PDT · 9 of 69
    butterdezillion to old curmudgeon

    I agree. It’s all a distraction. But they keep coming back to it. And I keep thinking it’s not like sophisticated hackers would leave fingerprints all over. But this analysis seems to claim just that. So what’s the deal with that? Are they just making stuff up, and IT people all know they’re making it up, or what?

  • VANITY: IT Experts Please Help Sort Out Intel Claims of Russian Hack

    10/19/2016 8:56:07 PM PDT · 8 of 69
    butterdezillion to Mariner

    So this company that did this analysis - would they have a way to check if the emails really came from the France IP that is associated with the Russians?

    Then again, who knows whether the analysis that they’re posting has genuine data either. They could change stuff.

    But if what they have is genuine, would their analysis and conclusions be possible and/or correct?

  • Hillary: All 17 of our security agencies say that Russia hacked our national computer systems

    10/19/2016 8:52:10 PM PDT · 24 of 124
    butterdezillion to Talisker

    This is a link that talks about an analysis connecting the DCLeaks hack with the Russians:

    I don’t understand this stuff; just started a vanity thread asking knowledgeable Freeper IT people to explain whether this analysis is valid or not.

  • VANITY: IT Experts Please Help Sort Out Intel Claims of Russian Hack

    10/19/2016 8:48:19 PM PDT · 3 of 69
    butterdezillion to butterdezillion

    Specifically I’m wondering if there’s a way they can know the IP address a message originated from, without there being any proxies, gates, etc.