Free Republic

For more on Cafasso's antics, check out the blog "Carteret Con Artist".

Robert Stormer (aka Cafasso) produced an article recently that was published at "Common Dreams" and at Larry Johnson's "No Quarter", which is alleged to have been plagiarized. Cafasso has one blogspot blog called "Stuporpatriots" where he goes after Jack Idema relentlessly, and another new blogspot blog under this new Robert Stormer name he has assumed, Robin Storm. Strangely enough, that one is being updated despite the fact that Cafasso is in jail in Indiana right now.

The bio of Stormer at the Common Dreams site goes like this:

Robert Stormer of Chicago is a retired lieutenant commander in the Navy Reserve, serving with the Navy's Supervisor of Salvage, and was a specialist in weapons retrieval. He is a marine engineer and marine salvage specialist. © 2007 Star-Telegram

The blogger at the North Country Gazette tried to verify Stormer's credentials with the Fort Worth Star Telegram, but to no avail - back in October of 2007.

He may have began his career with Pat Buchanan, but he was also featured in the far left expose on Fox News entitled "Outfoxed".

You can see a clip of his small appearance in that movie here at youtube.

But all of that is around the time he was exposed as a fraud in the New York Times in the article "At Fox News The Colonel Who Wasn't". Now and for at least the past year- he has assumed an entirely new persona; that of Robert Stormer, the storm chaser- and under that fictious identity-victimized a woman in Indiana who is now about to loose both of her homes because of him. This is just the tip of the iceberg where Joe Cafasso is concerned.

You ain’t kidding.

Actually, if Covington is pretending to be a Freeper for Obama, there is no telling who else is a pretender here...

The main purpose of putting this up was to invite people to the meeting on August 2nd.

If you are within weekend traveling distance, please consider joining Tom Burnett Sr. in Somerset PA on August 2nd. If you get there early enough for the Memorial Project’s public meeting (10AM-1PM) you can sign up to speak. We will rally in the afternoon on Saturday, and visit the crash-site Sunday.

Mean Machine, SEEMS TO BE is wrong.

What makes it distasteful is that it violates the public law for the memorial which excludes the terrorists from the definition of passengers and crew; and are not to be memorialized.

There are repeated terrorist memorializing features in this thing.

It not only points to Mecca, it points to their designated target; Washington, D.C.

There are two references to the number 19; the 19 hijackers of 9/11, in numerous crescents throughout the design - and a crescent is an Islamic symbol; not an American one. All you need to do is research Islamic countries’ flags - and the flags of terrorist groups which feature the crescent as their symbol.

There is an Islamic Sundial called ‘the tower of voices’ which designates the times for prayer throughout the year. There are specific calculations necessary for an Islamic Sundial.

Repeatedly throughout the design, wherever our heroes are referenced, they are thrown out of the Islamic heavens - they are banished to hell. Wherever the terrorists are referenced, they are in the Islamic heavens.

For example, in the “tower of voices”, our heroes are strung up in the center of it - in the form of wind chimes - like dead fish.

The “tower of voices” is a minaret that literally calls the umma to prayer - and the chimes inside represent our heroes, twisting in the wind and rain, clanging for all eternity.

It’s rather sickening if you think about it.

None of these things happened by accident.

And neither did the at least 13 mosque characteristics just ‘happen’ to pop in there by accident.

1. A qibla wall
2. A mihrab
3. A prayer area
4. A pulpit or dais called the mimbar or the minbar
5. A courtyard, called the sahan.
6. Arcaded or colonnaded porticos called riwaqs, surrounding the courtyard.
7. If the courtyard is roofed, the riwaqs will be roofed. If the courtyard is open air, like in the memorial mosque, at least a portion of the riwaqs will be roofed.
8. Full-service mosques provide waters for conducting ablutions before prayer. Ablution waters are placed within the courtyard or out through the colonnaded porticos that gain access to the courtyard.
9. Full-service mosques allowing women will have a separate women’s prayer area.
10. An imposing facade.
11. A crescent-shaped or arch-shaped entry portal.
12. A minaret, or minarets from which they call to prayer.
13. A tomb or other memorial.

Yes, yo-yo-, the Flight 93 Memorial design still has 44 glass blocks in it - 40 for the heroes, and 4 for the terrorists.

1 dedicates the site at the entrance of the memorial to the terrorists, and 3 more dedicate the date to the terrorists.

There are 14 characteristics in the design that make it a memorial mosque to the hijackers; the biggest mosque in North America by a factor of 100.

I didn't write it. If I had, I wouldn't have put that disclaimer in there.

Read Jihad by the Numbers - for a stunning analysis of how Islam first encroaches then terrorizes and consumes a society.

If you are within weekend traveling distance, please consider joining Tom Burnett Sr. in Somerset PA on August 2nd. If you get there early enough for the Memorial Project’s public meeting (10AM-1PM) you can sign up to speak. We will rally in the afternoon on Saturday, and visit the crash-site Sunday.

This is an incredible accomplishment for these troops...please pass the word

See the clip here.

Picking it up from where we left off, let's keep ripping up Mariah Blake's garbage hit piece from the Smear Jack Cabal on Idema called "Tin Soldier".

See the rest WITH PICTURES at my blog right here.

The reason I didn't post it here is because there are copyrighted images there that I have permission only to use at my site.

The entire piece by Mariah Blake was meant for the sole purpose of discrediting this man, and he's been doing this work for over 27 years and is no "mercenary" or "hired gun" or "bounty hunter", as they portray him to be. This guy is a highly trained special forces operator.

Shame on the lefties who portray him as a criminal, and shame on the people on the right who haven't picked up the torch for him. He is an American citizen, was declared innoncent over a year ago by the Afghans, but the State Department has insisted he be held anyway, so he's been defined as a 'political prisoner'.

Why aren't more people asking questions of our government as to why they were tortured with members of the FBI standing in the hallway laughing about it? Why aren't more people holding our government accountable for treating American citizens in this despicable manner?

I thought the military was supposed to 'leave no man behind'. In this case, both sides have abandoned not only Jack Idema, but Brent Caraballo (the journalist) and Captain Brent Bennett. There's something wrong here, and it's time people started asking some hard questions and demanding a congressional investigation.

From my Blog: If you're looking for pieces on Jack Idema and his team, please click on this link. I have read this over numerous times and I just have to laugh at what passes for "journalism" these days. I thought I'd start picking apart the inflammatory lies of "Tin Soldier" by Mariah Blake from Columbia Journalism Review--you know, just for kicks. Again, her piece is going to be in bold type because I'll be quoting from other articles and sources to punctuate certain points. It's odd, isn't it, how simply easy (and fun) it is to pick apart the flagrant misinformation that's spread by the media on just about any issue. They are becoming completely irrelevant. What's more is--they seem to be living in an Alice and Wonderland kind of dreamworld because they justify what they do to the 'nth' degree, when they have no facts to back them up. It's quite entertaining what's being taught as far as Journalism Standards and "ethics" in Journalism school. So the next time you read a piece about the high and mighty ethics and standards of one--oh--Columbia Journalism Review--you might try to remember how "reliable" and "factual" the crap really is. Let's begin by acknowledging up front that Zalmay Khalilzad an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Columbia University from 1979-1986, which might explain quite a bit about this piece to begin with. Ok, now for some fun.

In April, 2004, a former US Special Forces Soldier named Jonathan Keith Idema started shopping a sizzling story to the media.

Is that so? So in those few sentences you have set the stage and have pinned him as some sort of of a con man "shopping a sizzling story"...

He claimed terrorists in Afghanistan planned to use bomb-laden taxicabs to kill key US and Afghan officials, and that he himself intended to thwart the attack.

So he if I'm to swallow what you're saying here, I'm to follow the assumption that Jack had a crystal ball and planned all this out head of time? Where is your proof that he was saying this before the fact or are we to accept what you're saying merely at face value? That's the problem with so much of this, the statements are made but no verfiable facts are offered so we're just supposed to blindly believe and go along with it.

Shortly thereafter, he's headed to Afghanistan, where he spent the next two months conducting a series of raids with his team, which he called Task Force Saber 7. By late June, he claimed to have captured the plotters, and started trying to clinch a deal with television networks by offering them "direct access" to one of the terrorists who, he said, had agreed to tell all.

hmmm. My recollection of these early events are that Idema was in Afghanistan in 2001, before these events and it was reported by your buddies in the AP. You know, Nahrin Earthquake (where he was depicted as a hero), Anaconda (where he was depicted as a hero), etc. But all that aside, here's the true story in a nutshell: Gulumsaki was nabbed getting off a bus, and was caught red-handed with a letter from his brother at Gitmo in his pocket. The real news is what all of that intelligence led to. And contrary to news reports and blogging frauds, CBS had a representative present who was recording everything in addition to Caraballo. You see, CBS originally had an interest in this story. They were interested in reporting on how Idema's methods were different than those demonstrated by the idiots at Abu Grhaib. In essence, their intention was to report that Abu Ghraib was the exception and not the rule.

In exchange for footage and access, Idema wanted a minimum of $250,000 and prominent play. He asked that ABC send Peter Jennings or Cristopher Cuomo to cover the story. Ultimately ABC turned the story down, as did CNN, a CBS spokesperson, Kelli Edwards, says the network "never seriously considered" it, although Idema was regularly e-mailing Dan Rather's office and in June, the network sent two employees to Idema's Kabul headquarters to pick up the sample tape.

That's interesting, because Idema didn't talk to anyone but CBS about this. It was Caraballo who had a relationship with ABC and nobody talked with CNN. And to be sure, there is so much more to CBS's involvement in this story! CBS wanted to confirm reports that Idema and his team had captured the brother-in-law of bin Laden's chief of security and the terrorists responsible for the murder of Canadian ISAF Corporal Jamie Brendan Murphy. Corporal Murphy had been murdered in a bombing on Darlaman Road in Kabul on January 27, 2004. Once CBS confirmed this, they saw it as an important story against the war on terror. Idema told CBS that approval for the story would have to be obtained by the Department of Defense before he could discuss his relationship with Bagram or Task Force 180. Idema told CBS that any story should focus on the United Front Military Forces' continued efforts to combat Al Qaeda and why Massoud's UFMF needed continued American supported in their counter terrorist operations. CBS's bureau chief, with the approval of Andrew Hayward and others, were inside Sabre 7's compound during the period when several terrorists were in custody an awaiting transfer to Bagram. CBS's Michael Brandenberg was at the compound on numerous occasions, and even spoke directly with Osama Bin Laden's chief of security's brother in law. CBS said they wanted to show how co-opting a terrorist accomplished more than humiliation by untrained interrogators. Idema allowed CBS to transmit interrogation video back to the US from the CBS Kabul office.

Idema, who was paying an Emmy Award-winning cameraman to document his activities, even distributed a sample tape of himself arresting people and interrogating hooded suspects. In one scene he is shown blocking a road and emptying passing vehicles. "Put your fucking hands up or I'll blow your fucking brains out," he screams at a group of men who have shuffled bewilderedly off a bus and are standing with their flimsy tunics whipping in the wind.

Jack did not pay Caraballo to be a cameraman in Afghanistan. My sources tell me that Jack did not even want to bring Caraballo, or any journalist, and the Army asked him to bring three different journalists, all of which Jack turned down. Wow, Mariah, pretty dramatic screenplay you're writing there. I wonder why you completely turned around on this. You didn't mention how impressed you were with Idema and how you were talking about how great Idema was after viewing those tapes. Jack dictated a legal contract and within a day or so, there was a response from Columbia Journalism review that it didn't meet with their "objective" hoity-toity "truth telling" standards. HA! And that they would not comply. AND, they contacted Polaris images to get the same photographs licensed for use that Stacy Sullivan had used in HER hit piece. So someone is trying to cover for Stacy Sullivan's putting her neck out there on this one. The clip where their robes were 'whipping in the wind" (if I'm not mistaken) was the one where Ghulamsaki was caught red-handed with the Red Cross letter from his brother at Gitmo in his pocket as he got off a bus. The only reason that Idema and his men got the guy was because they had excellent intelligence on where he would be and when. Some guys claim they just drive around and see what happens. Idema isn't one of those. These captured terrorists were working with and/or for; Osama bin Laden, al-Qaida, Gulbideen Hekmatyar, Hezb-i-Islami, and the Taliban. Specifically, these terrorists had participated in, supported, and/or personally conducted terrorist bomb attacks against foreign and domestic persons in Afghanistan. A prime target of these terrorists was U.S. military forces at Bagram Airbase north of Kabul in Afghanistan. In fact, the American FBI later confirmed Task Force Saber/7’s intelligence reports that several of the terrorists were going to drive fuel trucks into Bagram and explode them into U.S. military barracks in a terrorist bomb attack similar to the bombing of the U.S. Marine Barracks in Beirut in 1983 in which 244 U.S. Marines were killed. Using a rare incendiary explosive to detonate fuel tanks on the gas trucks entering Bagram daily, and taxis, the terrorists expected to kill more than 500 American soldiers, two ministers, and two ambassadors in at least five separate coordinated attacks. These same terrorists had already made at least one attempt on the Defence Minister, and two failed attempts on the 3rd Corps commander, General Attiquallah Lodeen, a close friend and trusted ally of the United States and a candidate for Parliament. Several of the captured terrorists were directly involved in the killing of Canadian Lance Corporal Jamie Murphy on January 27, 2004 in Kabul, the killing and wounding of election and aid workers in Nangahar and other provinces in Afghanistan, the attack of NATO ISAF forces in Kabul, and were currently planning and coordinating the assassinations of several of Karzai’s key political opponents in the Jamiat Party, including his Minister of Defense, Minister of Education, several Corps Commanders (former Northern Alliance Generals), and at least two Afghan Ambassadors (in Delhi and London) who supported the U.S. War on Terror. The Minister of Education, Yunis Qanooni, was the lead opponent to Karzai in Afghanistan’s new election under the Bonn Agreement, and was a prime target of the terrorists, along with Marshall Fahim, the Minister of Defence, and General Rashid Dostum. All of the terrorists had been arrested by Task Force Saber/7 with either actual explosives, detonators, bomb parts, and/or bomb plans in their possession, as well as documents and correspondence proving their links and association with the Taliban, Hezb-i-Islami, and al-Qaida, including handwritten maps and diagrams of a past bomb attack on General Lodeen, a Shabnama “night letter” calling for a jihad against Americans authored by none other than Mullah Omar himself, and in the case of a terrorist named Ghulamsaki a coded Red Cross letter from his brother (Mohammed Asef), an al-Qaida detainee in Cuba. Additionally, one of the terrorist’s taxis tested positive for explosives by German ISAF bomb teams. The physical evidence against the terrorists was irrefutable, conclusive, and backed-up by incriminating videotaped statements, undercover surveillance, informants, and extraordinary physical evidence. I'm sure you reported the lies [instead of the real story (which I find more interesting and compelling about Jack's character than the lies)] -that other journalists and probably your editor had decided upon. But contrary to the picture you're trying to paint, THAT is what REALLY happened.

It appears that Idema still hadn't sold the taxicab story by July 5, when his situation took a turn for the worse. The Afghan police raided his headquarters and discovered eight prisoners, some of them tethered to chairs in a back room, which was littered with bloody cloth. The men told reporters that they had been starved, beaten, doused with scalding water, and forced to languish for days in their own feces.

Give me a break. The red cross reports showed absolutely no evidence of torture except for one guy--some abrasions on his ankle because the flexicuffs were on too tight, and he was struggling to get out of them. No pictures emerged of the "bloody cloth", either. And do you think if there were pictures of actual torture that the media wouldn't have had a field day broadcasting them? As far as I recall, the actual complaint was that he wasn't allowed to take a PISS for 12 hours, and that violated Islamic law. That's a little bit different than languishing "for days in their own feces". All of the other things were later done to Jack and his men at Saderat after they were taken into custody on July 6. Of course, there was one picture that was put up at ABC Australia that showed Jack stitching up the terrorist Sherajan. Someone wrote that what he was doing in that picture was some weird kind of Nazi torture technique of removing brain tissue or some garbage. Actually, people at Bagram said he had fixed up that wound rather well and it was healing nicely. So those reports of Jack "torturing innocent Afghans" is so far off the mark it's breathtaking. Sharajan was also captured in May, long before the events that led up to their arrest on July 6. CBS' Michael Brandenburg was at the compound on numerous occasions, and witnessed the interrogation of Al Qaeda terrorists at the compound. Idema allowed CBS' representative to watch the interrogation of Corporal Murphy's killers, and view each of the terrorists in custody. Brandenburg was also allowed to speak directly with the brother-in-law of Bin Laden's Chief of Security, who was cooperating fully and willingly. CBS employees saw the methods of interrogation, the physical condition of the terrorist, and the conditions of the terrorists' detention, and knew that no torture was occuring. They didn't, of course, admit this after Idema's arrest because that would have indicated they were present and knew how Idema was conducting the questioning of the terrorists. So instead of telling the truth, they withheld information and proof that these men were innocent of the charges, and instead, put out the same lies the others were reporting.

Afghan authorities determined that none of the detainees had links to terrorism and set them free. Idema, on the other hand, was arrested, along with two other Americans (the cameraman and a former soldier) and four Afghans, and charged with running an unauthorized prison and torturing inmates. After a cursory trial, he was sentence to serve ten years. (This case is on appeal.)

Yes, the taliban kangaroo court allowed the terrorists to go free, and in August, there was a bombing at Bagram. Immediately after the "guilty" verdict, they filed and appeal and in the second trial they were declared completely innocent. The taliban judge (in the first trial), the former soviet communist interpreter and all the rest--didn't follow any of the rules of law...and later, the two main guys who were touting the story of abuse (Jalili and Mashal) resigned their posts (to save face) and ran off because they were exposed as the Taliban. Judge Sidiq was exposed as the taliban, linked to Hekmatyar (a buddy of Bin Laden's). There was a vast difference in the terrorist interrogations done by Idema and the experienced intelligence agents working with him as compared to the young interrogators at Abu Ghraib and other locations. CBS' Bureau Chief said Heyward wanted to compare Idema's effective interrogation techniques with the poor techniques used at Abu Ghraib. CBS said they wanted to show how co-opting a terrorist accomplished more than humiliation by untrained interrogators. Idema allowed CBS to transmit interrogation video back to the US from the CBS Kabul office. Just a few hours after Michael Brandenburg left for the last time, Idema was arrested by anti-UFMF forces, at the request of Interior Minister Ahmad Ali Jalali (exposed later as Taliban or officially "former" Taliban) of "running a torture chamber", "torturing innocent Afghans", and other illegal conduct. Three other false claims by Jalali were that Idema had "innocent Afghans hung from the ceiling in his basement", that the terrorists were being "abused, tortured and starved" and that Idema and his men were "rounding up innocent Muslims with long beards" (only 3 of 11 had long beards). CBS and other news networks piled on and reported Jalali's false claims and similar false allegations by Jalali's spokesman Lutfullah Mashal. Ahmad Ali Jalali was a former Voice of America radio news translator in Washington, DC. Jalali, a vehemently anti-UFMF (Northern Alliance) Pashtun from the south, is alleged to have had a prior relationship with CBS News and Fox News. CBS News had also worked with Lutfullah Mashal in the past. Mashal was a former translator for journalists during the 2001/2002 war and had close connections with the Taliban. Idema had warned both CBS and FOX about Mashal's Taliban connections in 2001 and 2002, yet they still employed Mashal and worked with him during that time. Interestingly enough, since these events have taken place, Mashal and Jalali "resigned". Don't these so-called journalists realize how transparent their attempts are at this fakery and fraudulent news reporting? Note how several of these pieces have come out where they use the same terms, and the same so-called "sources" and "experts" who have turned out to be complete lying frauds. It's like a handful of journalists are using a handful of lying sources, and writing the same lies to cover for each other while destroying the reputation of someone who's a legend in SF Ops and deserves much better than this. After what he did--I think he deserves at least a medal! And instead, he got imprisonment and torture with FBI agents laughing in the hallway. Something is terribly wrong with this picture.

For all its outlandish twists, the saga of the taxicab plot was not extraordinary for Idema, who over the years had fed the press a variety of sensational material that seemed to shed light on the shadowy world of secret soldiers, spies and assassins. This time the story never ran, but Idema had been a key source for numerous questionable stories that did. A self-proclaimed terror-fighter who has served time for fraud, Idema took a willing media by storm, glorifying his own exploits, padding his bank account, and providing dubious information to the American public.

Oh that one is rich. Painting Idema with the same brush as assassins and spies really indicates to me that you don't understand the job of a Green Beret, or the work of special forces. Or who we're fighting, or war in general. It didn't seem to me that the AP had any problem with his record before this, when he single-handedly rescued 300 women and children after the earthquake in Nahrin. Take a look at the archived articles here. What this seems to boil down to, Ms. Blake, is media whores talk the line that sells papers. Even if it's a lie. What happened to journalists doing RESEARCH for a piece --and providing factual information? Idema may have made some money over the years, but he has also spent much of his own money--to the point where he's virtually homeless--to fight terrorism and help the people in Afghanistan. But of course telling the truth about the man isn't as juicy as telling lies that portray him as a 'rogue bounty hunter'. I'm not sure about that, really...I'd rather see the real story told...and unfortunately I'm only seeing it because of my own research. What a sad commentary about the media!

In January 2002, Idema sold CBS sensational footage, which he called the "VideoX" tapes, that purported to show an Al Qaeda training camp in action. The tapes became the centerpiece of the bombshell 60 Minutes II piece, "Heart of Darkness", reported by Dan Rather and touted as "the most intimate look yet at how the world's deadliest terrorist organizaton trains its recruits." Idema also sold video stills to a number of press outlets, including the Boston Globe. MSNBC, ABC, NBC, the BBC, and others later replayed the tapes. Questions are now emerging about their authenticity, some of which were detailed in a piece by Stacy Sullivan in New York magazine in October.

Boy you apologists are really quick to stroke each other off, aren't you? Gotta love that one. There are no "questions about their authenticity" except those in the media, like you, who are trying to perpetrate this fraud on the public. And it would also seem that Stacy Sullivan, up until this point, was hanging out there all alone with that ridiculous piece "Operation Desert Fraud" --so someone at the Columbia Journalism Review had to come in and "rescue" her by printing the identical false accusations, using the same questionable lying fraudulent sources! Here's Peter Bergen's response to those lies. Last October, New York magazine raised the possibility that the Al Qaeda videotapes Idema supplied to 60 Minutes II were faked, a seemingly plausible scenario given Idema's previous fraud conviction. But when I visited the town of Mir Bacha Kot, about a half-hour north of Kabul, Deputy Police Chief Mohammed Araf told me that Arabs had indeed used the town as a military base under the Taliban, and the buildings in Mir Bacha Kot match those on the Idema-supplied tapes. A journalist from a leading U.S. media organization who evaluated the tapes told me he had no doubt they were authentic but passed on them only because Idema was demanding tens of thousands of dollars for them. Now consider that what Bergen is saying about Idema asking tens of thousands of dollars for those tapes is true (I don't believe it for a second.). What do you suppose is the dollar value of the lengths to which he had to go to get that footage? Or the personal sacrifice that he and his family have made in order for him to do this difficult work? Is money any compensation? Probably not. Do you realize that Idema doesn't have very much at all at present, and do you know the reasons why? Idema hasn't asked for a dime from any journalist for those tapes. But even if he had--he's virtually homeless because he's been using his own money to fight this war on terror, and to help the Afghan people. To me, the claim that he's in this for a buck is disingenuous at best. As a matter of fact, it also seems to me as though it's the people on the other side who are trying to make a buck off him while he's in prison and can't defend himself.

Idema also served as an expert military commentator on Fox News and was a lead character in Robin Moore's best-selling book "The Hunt for Bin Laden", which was supposed to chronicle the exploits of U.S. Special Forces in Afghanistan. And he fielded hundreds of interviews with major newspapers, television networks, and radio stations, which seem to take his swaggering claims--that he was an active-duty Green Beret in Afghanistan, an undercover spy, an explosives expert, and a key player in the hunt for Osama bin Laden--at face value.

He IS all of those things. And for your all of your elitist bluster, you've missed one key point about being a Green Beret. Being a Green Beret is something you earn through your training and courses you've taken. It's an honorary award that President Kennedy began to bestow on SF operatives. IT NEVER GOES AWAY. From Wikipedia: Their official motto is De opresso liber ("To liberate the oppressed"). The Green Beret was originally unauthorized for wear by the U.S. Army. It was legitimized by President John F. Kennedy who encouraged the wearing of the beret by the Special Forces. Preparing for an October 12, 1961 visit to the Special Warfare Center at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, the President sent word to the center's commander, Brigadier General William P. Yarborough, for all Special Forces soldiers to wear the beret as part of the event. The President felt that since they had a special mission, Special Forces should have something to set them apart from the rest. In 1962, he called the Green Beret "a symbol of excellence, a badge of courage, a mark of distinction in the fight for freedom." The Green Beret is an AWARD. All other headgear and uniforms are issued when you are assigned to a unit. Dr.'s are not called former doctors, Rangers are not called former Rangers, nor are SEALs called former SEALs, because these are awards which have specific requirements, such as graduating specific schools. I've never seen any article declaring that Idema is active military--to the contrary; he's a Green Beret, and a specialist in several areas as was described in this post. C'mon, Miss Blake, do your homework. Well actually if you'd done your homework, this piece would have turned out very differently, that is obvious.

Idema used the platform the media provided to spread dubious information, much of it with curcial implications for national security and foreign policy. For example, he claimed to have uncovered a plot to assassinate Bill Clinton; that Bin Laden was dead, and that the Taliban was poisoning the food that the United States was air dropping to feed hungry Afghans. (In fact, people were getting sick from eating the dessicant packed with the food.)

Oh that's interesting, Miss Blake. The Guardian reported on this in 1998 and is it a coincidence that Jack Idema isn't mentioned in the article??? I don't ever quote the Guardian because it's a socialist rag, but listen to this:

Counter-terrorism and intelligence sources say Ramzi Yousef, who was convicted of the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Centre in New York, was due to carry out the killing in Manila. He allegedly told FBI agents escorting him to New York for his bombing trial that he planned to kill Mr Clinton by blowing up his motorcade with a missile or explosives, but gave up because the security was so tight. Yousef, it is reported, did not say Mr Bin Laden was behind the plot. But one of his co-defendants, Walk Khan Amin Shah, once a senior aide to Mr Bin Laden, allegedly said the order had come from the Saudi millionaire, who now lives in Afghanistan.

Would those counter terrorism sources be Jack Idema? They don't name their source of that information in the article by name. BTW, the only place I can find the information about Jack claiming the Taliban was poisoning the people is on the websites which are stupid enough to have spread around your bullshit article. Ted Kavanau tells me that the dessicant story is actually quite different than you describe. Actually, if you'd bothered to check, it was document in several places. In Jon Lee Anderson's "The Lion's Grave":

His first mission was to provide ground assistance to the air drops of U.S. humanitarian aid rations. He had also conducted an investigation into the rumors circulating among Afghans that the rations were poisoned. “I found out who did it,” Jack said, “and it was not Al Qaeda or the Taliban. And there wasn’t any poison. The people were eating the desiccant” –the preservative drying agent—“that comes in little packets in each ration pack. It says “Do Not Eat” in English, French, Spanish and Chinese. But not in Farsi or Pashto. They thought it was spices! So there were some severe injuries and several presumed deaths. One guy who died ate the Handi Wipes, the desiccant—everything. These people, I mean they don’t even have napkins, how do they know what a Handi Wipe is? I gather he thought it smelled good, so he ate it.” Other people had become ill, Jack found, because many of the ration packs had exploded on impact, and the food inside had been exposed and become contaminated. Jack said that he wrote a report that was sent to DOD, and about a week later the problems were sorted out.

And in Hunt for Bin Laden.

Even though they had six DZs (drop zones) mapped and ready to receive food drops, the Air Force continued to drop the food packs blind, suing what was referred to as "flutter method," an untested procedure where the HDRs were simply dumped out of the back of cargo planes. Idema was not happy with the way food drops were being conducted and started firing off messages to his friends at Fort Benning, Fort Bragg, and the Pentagon. While he waited for a response he started collecting airdropped food packs. Recovering some from the mountains and the desert floor, he paid the Afghans $5 each out of his own pocket so they could purchase rice instead. The Afghans had claims the HDRs were making them ill. Once Idema had a selection of HDR samples from across northeastern Afghanistan, the investigation quickly took an unexpected turn. The packs had desiccant in them, a drying agent and moisture retardant that was packaged in small paper pouches and looked just like Afghan medicine or the spice packets in Russian noodles. Afghans started eating the desiccant. Sick Afghans started eating even more, thinking the U.S. was kindly dropping medicine. Idema's civilian team fired off a report that Afghans were getting sick from desiccant. One village even claimed a man had died. (HDRs were printed in English, French, German and Spanish, nonexistent languages in remote Afghan villages. Eventually the Air Force started dropping cartoon leaflets that explained how to eat the food.) Colin Powell received a copy of the team's email and wanted answers. Natick Labs in Massachusetts initiatially denied the report and told the Pentagon and Powell that there was no desiccant in the HDRs. Washington believed them. The message returned to Idema's team from "higher up" said the team was wrong, their intel was bad, and they were basically out in left field and unreliable. Pissed off, Idema went back to the drawing board. Twenty-four hours later he was emailing digital pictures of desiccant packs via INMARSAT. In the process he discovered something far worse. The HDRs had been packed in Texas, Indiana, and South Carolina at low altitudes. They had been dropped at altitudes far exceeding ten thousand feet. The sealed packs expanded in the air, and then hit the ground at terminal velocity, exploding the sealed food inside and causing slight tears in the other protective plastic wrapper. Exposed to the rugge Aghan terrain and harsh elements, the food inside rapidly spoiled and became contaminated. Digital pictures were transmitted through INMARSAT to Fort Benning's Battle Lab. Idema got word that Donald Rumsfeld had demanded answers from Natick. The following day the team was excstatic, a Natick official admitted the presence of desiccant and the more important contamination problem, stating that government contrators had violated DoD (Department of Defense) product specifications.

Yeah, here's a "rogue" warrior criminal guy who a) doesn't care about the Afghan people and b) has no contacts in Washington. Give me a break. Idema never told anyone that the Taliban was poisoning the food that the Americans were dropping into Afghanistan as humanitarian aid to starving people. You could easily speculate that the American government itself started to talk that way--in the beginning when they were denying that desiccants were in the food. Here's an SF Operator from comments [thanks, Dan]:

I would like to add that ANYONE that doubts your facts can contact ANY member of TIGER 03 (JSOTF Codename for ODA 595- 5th Special Forces Group (ABN), Fort Campbell, KY). If you check the early October 2001 Reports from the DOD, I think you will find that it was the DOD PAO and an ASD who stated at a PRESS CONFERENCE that THEY believed the Taliban was poisoning the airdrops in Northern Afghanistan (I was already in the ISOFAC preparing to deploy when we were briefed on it). During the press conference the DOD was defending dropping food and not bombs on Northern Afghanistan, which was of course the RIGHT thing to do because these people were, and are still, our allies, even if the American State Department has now deserted them and has us working with the new ANA (a joke of a Keystone Cop army). Jack Idema went into Northern Afghanistan with a primary mission to find out who WAS poisoning the food drops and to get more food drops to the Northern Alliance and get the right kind of food landing on actual drop zones instead of USAF "blind drops." This was secretly coordinated by the DAT at both the American and Afghan Embassies in Dushanbe, Tajikistan. Jack Idema found out the real cause of the poisoning and HDR problems. Idema FIXED the problem single handily, through initiative, ingenuity, and pure guts. Make no mistake about it, four of the men on my team currently here in Afghanistan know for absolute fact that Jack Idema’s version of the HDR story is true.

Kavanau called the Pentagon and they denied these packets were packed in that food. PLUS, there were several reporters who claimed they broke the dessicant story FIRST and were pissed that Idema picked it up as though it were his. That's the only problem here--Idema never said the Taliban was poisoning the food. That's utter BS, but it goes along with the rest of the BS flavor of this piece. I can pick holes in every single paragraph of this thing... I'm going to stop at the piece de resistance...just a few more to go...This next one is priceless...

Idema's career as a media personality reached its peak during the final breathless weeks of the run-up to the war in Iraq. Much of the information he provided during that period echoed the Bush administration's hotly contested rationale for the war. He told MSNBC that the link between Iraq and Al Qaeda was "common knowledge" on the ground in Afghanistan, and claimed in an interview with WNYC radio's Leonard Lopate that "Iraq has been involved in supporting Al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations with money, with equipment, with technology, with weapons of mass destruction." He told other wide-eyed journalists that there was ample evidence linking "Iraq, Iran, and Saudi Arabia to Al Qaeda and to the attacks on September 11," and professed to have firsthand knowledge of nuclear weapons being smuggled from Russia to all three members of the "axis of evil"--Iraq, Iran and North Korea. Few in the media questioned Idema's claims, much to the alarm of some who knew him.

This is too much, :lol:. The "rationale for the war" is not, nor has it ever been "hotly contested". An neither is the Saddam/Iraq/Al Qaeda/Bin Laden Connection. Only where the myth plays dramatically--in the no-account clueless world of the media. What familiar about all of this is how FDR was demonized in the press for the war with the nazis. At the time, Joe Kennedy tried to talk him out of it; saying that Hitler had it "in the bag". Clare Boothe Luce was the wife of Time Magazine Founder Harry Luce, and she was also a playright. Clare Boothe Luce said that FDR "lied us into war" with the nazis. So this is all eerily familiar. And as usual, the leftists are on the wrong side of history. Because as it's been pointed out before, they've been wrong about every single conflict we've ever been engaged in. But I digress. A couple of words on the Saddam Hussein/Al Qaeda Connection, one of which is husseinandterror.com

*Photographs taken by Malaysian intelligence in January 2000 place Ahmed Himat Shakir, an Iraqi intelligence operative, at key planning meetings with Al Qaeda members for the bombing of the USS Cole and the September 11 attacks. * In 1992, according to Iraqi intelligence documents obtained after the war, bin Laden met with Iraqi intelligence officials in Syria. * Sudanese intelligence officials told me that their agents had observed meetings between Iraqi intelligence agents and bin Lade3n starting in 1994, when bin Laden lived in Khartoum. * Michael Scheuer, the former head of the bin Laden unit at the CIA and a sharp critic of the Bush administration, writes in his 2002 "Through our Enemies' Eyes" that bin Laden "made a connection with Iraqi's intelligenc service through its Khatroum station. * Examining the bin Laden-Iraq-Sudan nexus in the early 1990s, Weekly Standard writer Stephen Hayes reports: "In Sudan, bin Laden decided to acquire and, when possible, use chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) weapons against Islam's enemies. Bin Laden's first moves in this direction were made in cooperation with NIF (Sudan's National Islamic Front), Iraq's intelligence service, and Iraqi CBRN scientists and technicians. He made contact with Baghdad with its intelligence officers in Sudan and by a [Hass al-] Turabi-brokered June 1994 visit by Iraq's then intelligence chief Faruq al-Hijazi; according to Milan's Corriere della Sera, Saddam, in 1994, made al-Hijazi responbielf ro "nurting Iraq's ties to [Islamic] fundamentalist warriors. Turabi had plans to formulate a "common strategy" with bin Laden and Iraq for subverting pro-U.S. Arab regimes, but the meeting was a get-acquainted session where al-Hijazi and bin Laden developed a good rapport that would flourish in the late 1990's. * Bin Laden met at least eight times with officers of Iraq's Special Security Organization, a secret police agency run by Saddam's son Qusay, according to intelligence made public by Secretary of State Colin Powell, speaking before the UN Security Council on February 6, 2003. *Bin Laden met the director of the Iraqi Mukhabarat, Iraqi's external intelligence service, in Khartoum in 1996, according to Powell. * An al Qaeda oeprative now held by the US confessed that in the mid-1990's, bin Laden had forged an agreement with Saddam's men to cease all terrorist activities against the Iraqi dictator, Powell said. * Saddam's relationship to bin Laden was documented while the arch terrorist was based in Sudan from 1991 to 1996, Patrick Fitzgerald, an US attorney in the Clinton US Justice Department, prepared an indictment of bin Laden. "Al Qaeda reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that Al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the government of Iraq." This is substantially what Powell would tell the UN years later, on the eve of the war.

From Disinformation, by Richard Miniter, Page 110, 2005 Regnery Publishing. And this is only a small part of the list. You've got Meetings, Money, Training Personnel...the list of connections is extensive. And on and on and on. Look, if I can come up with this stuff, why can't a journalist who's supposed to be "connected" with tell-all sources? Oh yeah. I forgot. Journalism isn't about reporting facts, it's about spinning the news according to the party line. IN this case, it's about furthering "no wmd", "Bush lied, men died", etc.. So the party line on Idema was to paint him as a "rogue warrior", a backyard "paintball" enthusiast who had fantasies of 007, but who was really a criminal. I think that about sums it up. Needless to say--outside of the blind lying elitist journalist circles, there is no doubt a clear connection between Bin Laden, Al Qaeda and 9/11. And there is also no doubt that Idema has an extensive background in counter terrorist operations, is a former Special Forces soldier, and a Green Beret. At any rate, we all know the suitcase nukes story is true; this ABC News Clip from 1999 describes the fact that Bin Laden was actively pursuing obtaining nuclear weapons, declaring it is the duty of muslims to possess these weapons. Weaving in the baseless statement that the rationale for the war was hotly contested is merely the continued perpetration of the big lie on the American public. Blake's piece demonizes one of the greatest patriots of our time; Jack Idema. I'm pretty sick of this, and I'd like to see just one large pundit--just one big blogger to pick up this story--because right now, all "news outlets" are pretty sad in my estimation--as perveyors of truth, as far as reporting anything at home or abroad accurately, fairly, or taking the best interests of our national security at heart.

"The media saw this outfitted, gregarious, apparently knowing guy, and they didn't check him out," says Ed Artis, chairman and founder of the humanitarian organization Knightsbridge International, who met Idema in Afghanistan in late 2001 and later tried to warn the government and media organizations that Idema was misrepresenting himself. "They ran story after story that furthered the cachet of a self-serving, self-aggrandizing criminal."

Whew. Put your boots on, and pull up your pantlegs. Let's take a look at this last paragraph. Who exactly is Ed Artis? Since I've taken up this story, people are coming out of the woodwork who are surprised he hasn't gotten people killed, surprised he hasn't gotten himself killed, and more importantly, are anxious to see the truth be told. Knightsbridge International is a supposed "humanitarian" organization that is supposedly doing good deeds. You can read about Artis' and Laws' exploits at several websites online. They talk about how Knightsbridge is a cross between Mother Teresa and Indiana Jones. If that doesn't make you roll your eyes back into their sockets, Artis' talks about being a Knight of Malta, that sounds impressive, doesn't it? But the fact is- Americans don't have Knights of anything. There are no American knights --except for the Knights of Malta, which you can join if you pay them $5,000. There are some definite similarities that I can see between Knightsbridge and George Galloway's Miriam Appeal. Artis has reportedly taken money people thought they were paying for humanitarian work to hire photojournalists to record his exploits on film. Artis, according to my sources, has a $400,000 or so home in California, which he had quick-claimed deeded to his wife in order to avoid problems with litigation. Miriam Appeal, which was originally put together to supposedly cure a little Iraqi child of leukemia, is still collecting funds, long after the little girl was cured, paying for, in part, Galloway's lavish lifestyle. The Global Coalition to End Human Trafficking NOW has some interesting things going on, not the least of which is an investigation for charity fraud. Curiously, Christine Dolan started up another organization in order to continue defrauding people out of their money, called The International Humanitarian Campaign Against the Exploitation of Children. Dolan's group claims connection with Knightsbridge. In addition to that, Ed Artis has claimed -under oath--that the medals he has worn to formal events (like at an event at West Point, for example)--are fake. During 1994, Artis scammed his way into a war zone and hitched a ride on a C-130, claimed he was "Airborne" so he could get to the capital, broke in and stole documents. He certainly isn't all that he claims to be, and you'd wonder why he'd want to steal documents and what he'd possibly be using them for? Another member of the smear Jack cabal said Artis "has helped more people than you can imagine'. Yeah, I wonder what the definition of "helped" is. Refusing to give the food you've stashed for your flabby self to starving people because all you're really looking for is pictures and movies taken of yourself "rescuing them"? Endangering a man by telling the media about his dangerous (and secret) mission, the times of the flights, etc., in order to brag that "mercs" would meet him at the airport? Supposed "Knights of Malta" who had "vowed" to "help" and would join him at New Orelans, New York, Brusssels, Kanshasa, Goma--who never showed up? But were hungry to get their hands on bloody machetes off the battlefield and sell them at a high price? Reminds me of the stories of him in Afghanistan--buying black turbans and smearing them with chicken blood and dirt, in order to claim he'd taken them off dead Taliban or Al Qaeda and turn around and sell them. What kind of sick minds come up with this stuff? Sure, it's sounds heroic to go to third world countries and provide any manner of relief--set yourself up as a "knight" which appeals to the elitists and opens their pocketbooks. Buy yourself a PHD from a papermill and claim you're a "doctor"--But it's also disgusting when the entire reputation--all the medals, the fake vatican passport, etc., are entirely fraudulent. When he went to Africa, he was taken into a combat zone and promising everyone he ran across, apparently not aware how dangerous things were, that he could get them a vatican passport. And from what I gather they didn't look real--they looked childish. He has (over the years) somehow managed to avoid getting people killed--which is something the people he's dealt with in places like Afghanistan still wonder at. Someone that clueless-that determined to pay for photojournalists to film him handing out blankets--and willing to re-shoot it--much like John Kerry--so he could get the best footage--is who the real man is. A man who gets almost a sexual pleasure out of self-promotion, and has a laundry list of fake exploits he's willing to wave in your face. He is Walter Mitty in the flesh. In just the first little more than a page--there are lies in every single paragraph of this piece! There is something wrong with this picture.

Idema's U.S. office is tucked inside a hulking brick warehouse in Fayetteville, North Carolina--home to Fort Bragg, America's largest military base and command center for the U.S. Army Special Operations. There's little to distinguish the building from its industrial surroundings except the dark-tinted windows, and the red "Restricted Access" plaque that clings to the front door. Inside, the cavernous space is cluttered with evidence of Idema's Afghan mission: crumpled boxes of medical supplies, a lime-green presentation board bearing an organizational chart for Al Qaeda, a massive topographical map of Afghanistan. Movie posters of scowling, leather-clad action heroes plaster the surrounding walls, including a particular large one from Men in Black over Idema's desk. It shows two movie stars clutching super-sized guns and reads, "Protecting the Earth from the Scum of the Universe". The decore reflects Idema's decades-long quest to fashion himself an action hero. He joined the army in 1975 and qualified for the Special Forces, but his performance was often lacking. In an evaluation report dated July 7, 1977, Captain John D. Carlson described him as "without a doubt the most unmotivated, unprofessional, immature enlisted man that I have ever known."

In reality, John D. Carlson was a 26-year old captain who was an ROTC guy who spent a year or so in the army and got out...where is he now? And where did that "evaluation report" come from? And who really wrote it? There is no such "evluation report". John D. Carlson doesn't exist anymore and what's a certifiable fact is--John D. Carlson was a guy who might have SAID that, but he didn't write it in any report. If he did, I'd sure like to see it, because I'm certain that it was one of those fakeries made up by a certain "Colonel" who's been very good at contacting the media and feeding them fake military documents to discredit Idema. Carlson wasn't even in a position to "evaluate" Idema.

In 1978 he transferred to a reserve unit where he served until 1981, when he was relieved of his duties, in part for his irrationality and tendency toward violence. His military records indicate that he never saw combat.

Too bad you haven't seen his DD214A. The DD214 shows the first time you get out. After that, it's the DD214A. Sure, he'll punch someone in the nose--somebody who deserves it, and I can't blame him. I've even heard that he allegedly pulled off a shot with a firearm at someone. So what if he did? Can't say I haven't seen that happen, either. I work with a guy whose hip was shot off by an elephant gun at a shooting range. He had a hip replacement when he was something like 25. And he was shot by his own relative, and there's still some question as to whether or not the incident was "accidental". So...stuff happens. Maybe not to pansies, but this guy is no pansy. Was the whiner hurt by the shots Jack allegedly pulled off, or was he just freaked out? And do you suppose with Jack's training he could have hit the mark, had he the inclination? Just think about that for a second. It's also an interesting observation that you took such detailed notes of your surroundings when you were stealing documents from his office. You certainly haven't noted any of the "facts" where he's concerned. Here again, we have a case where just about every line is manufactured by the Smear Jack Cabal or just complete garbage, so I'm going to wrap it up right here.

Prof's genealogy is sketchy; he offers little clarification

Should we show up expecting to blend into the crowd, or should we bring signs to protest him? I really can't stand this guy, particularly when he said the 9/11 victims were "little Eichmanns"...and that other comment he made about conscientious objectors in the military should be encouraged to frag (read KILL or injure) their officers.

I don't understand the question.

That's terrific! I just got a new flag and a "club gitmo" flag from Rush Limbaugh. Cracks me up because I'm in a "blue state". When I went to the Cindy Sheehan event in Batavia there was an SUV that had two Iraqi flags flying from the windows...alongside other cars that said "IMPEACH BUSH".

On the news coverage of the last Cindy Sheehan event--they showed her...but they didn't show the people who were demonstrating against her --and she was only there about 2 minutes.

Well...I'm sure you're being facetious and know the answer to that already but I'll go ahead and answer it anyway.

The media is not covering anything about 9/11 memorials --because they're in support of the other side. They're in support of the Cindy Sheehans and the Code Pinks and the George Galloways and hollywood...that's why people are generally happy when they get their news from the internet and avoid the MSM. The MSM plainly is partisan and doesn't tell the truth. They still don't get it...but there are forces out there who are trying to shut down the internet as a news source...Google has all kinds of bias...indymedia is considered a news source...they don't allow certain ads but they allow ads for 'the other side' with the same exact verbiage. Someone did a test and found Google was plainly partisan.

That's why pictures like the chemical attacks on the kurds are so hard to find.

bwahahaha! That's pretty good. Only it sounds so close to what they say it's kinda scarey, too.

This message came to me from Move America Forward through email. I thought it was appropriate --because you can see--the Socialist Worker is promoting the tour for Jane Fonda and George Galloway. If you're reading this before the end of the day on Sunday, September 11, 2005 I hope you made the effort to fly the American Flag in front of your house or on display somewhere else prominently.

The flying of Old Glory on this day of infamy is the symbolism of our nation united in the face of a terrorist threat.

Our troops stand in harm's way in Afghanistan and Iraq, and some voices in this country are sounding a cry for retreat and seemingly attempting to play revisionist games with recent events.

It would be great if people all around this nation were reminded of some of the key points below. And perhaps they will be with your help - by sending a link to this post to friends, family members, co-workers and colleagues. And finally, I hope when you read this, you'll realize why we need your participation in the rallies we will hold across the nation the week after next, culminating in the giant "Support The Troops And Their Mission" Weekend in Washington, D.C. Keep watching the Move America Forward Website for more information.

President Bush Thanks Our Troops Serving in Iraq

The War in Iraq is Central

to the War on Terrorism

Some people in this nation have come to the incorrect conclusion that Operation Iraqi Freedom has nothing to do with the attacks against the United States on 9/11.

These people either are ill informed, or they deliberately are trying to mislead the American people in the hopes of turning them against our military, our commander in chief and the mission our men and women of the U.S. Armed Forces are serving in Iraq. In many cases they represent a radical, far-left agenda that most Americans would promptly denounce. One of the strongest advocates for the anti-war effort is the Socialist Worker which is now promoting the anti-war tours of Cindy Sheehan and British socialist politico, George Galloway.

This anti-military constituency ignores the fact that what made Afghanistan such a threat to this nation was that it served as a state-sponsored breeding ground and training ground for terrorism. Al Qaeda operatives were free to gain access to weapons, bomb-making materials and train terrorists in Afghanistan because the government of that nation was sympathetic to the extremist Islamic agenda that was very much anti-American and anti-Israel.

The same situation has existed in Iraq. Saddam Hussein provided a safe-harbor for terrorists to base their operations, gain access to forged papers to travel around the world, and to acquire the materials and weapons to slaughter Americans and other innocents of the West.

As Andrew McCarthy explains in National Review:

"Saddam Hussein's regime was a crucial part of that response because it was a safety net for al Qaeda. A place where terror attacks against the United States and the West were planned. A place where Saddam's intelligence service aided and abetted al Qaeda terrorists planning operations. A place where terrorists could hide safely between attacks. A place where terrorists could lick their wounds. A place where committed terrorists could receive vital training in weapons construction and paramilitary tactics. In short, a platform of precisely the type without which an international terror network cannot succeed."

If you don't want to believe us, maybe you'll believe the Iraqi General who served under Saddam Hussein and witnessed the training of more than 4,000 terrorists at Saddam's orders.

If you're still confused that the terrorist elements under Saddam Hussein's regime were part of the Islamic terrorist coalition (that includes Al Qaeda) maybe we can make it even more straightforward for you.

The individual who leads the terrorists in Iraq right now (who have injured or killed U.S. Troops, Coalition Forces, and Iraqi civilians) is a man named Abu Musab al Zarqawi. He is the head of Al Qaeda in Iraq.

Abu Musab al Zarqawi - Al Qaeda in Iraq

You would think given the fact that the organization shooting at the men and women of our Armed Forces in Iraq was named Al Qaeda in Iraq that it would occur to the anti-war/anti-military/anti-troop crowd that perhaps these were Osama Bin Laden's allies in Iraq.

But, again, they turn a deaf ear towards these facts because the facts undermine their anti-war/anti-military and anti-Bush jihad.

When you read in the newspapers or see on TV someone who says 'maybe we should pull out of Iraq' realize this very important fact: These individuals are saying we should surrender to Al Qaeda... that we should cut and run and admit defeat to the people who have savagely attacked our nation for more than the past decade (including the horrific attacks of 9/11, the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole, the bombings of U.S. Embassies around the world, the original bombing of the World Trade Centers in 1993, etc...).

Lest you think that the idea that the terrorists in Iraq are led by Al Qaeda is a right-wing falsehood, then perhaps you'll accept it when CNN (the most pro-Saddam television network during the two Gulf Wars) says it.

And if you or someone you know still doesn't get the role Iraq plays in the fight against terrorism and the ties to Al Qaeda, maybe hearing from one of the journalists who has been on the scene - in the thick of the battle with these terrorists - will provide a clearer understanding.

Michael Yon recently lamented about the fact that the mainstream news media had failed to realize that they were sitting on one of the most important stories from the fight in Iraq: that the Al Qaeda backed terrorist network in the Mosul area had been badly beaten back by Coalition Forces led by the United States. This would serve as a major victory for the war effort in Iraq, yet most journalists are so out-of-touch with the events in Iraq (and so biased against the military's mission there) that they didn't even realize the scoop beneath their noses:

"...the top Al-Qaeda leader in Mosul writes to the second most wanted man in the world, and describes in amazing detail the weaknesses and impending collapse of the terrorist network in Mosul and surrounds."

Secretary of State Condi Rice Greets U.S. Troops in Afghanistan

The "Bring Them Home Now" Crowd

Want to Surrender in Afghanistan Too

Those who have been taking to the streets (and to the ditches of Crawford, Texas) to argue for U.S. Troops to withdraw from Iraq, have insisted that they support the broader fight against terrorism.

However, these are false words made in a defensive posture, said out of necessity. Many of the same voices who advocate surrendering to the terrorists in Iraq were vocal opponents to a military response against Al Qaeda following the 9/11 attacks on the United States.

Let's take the example of one of the better known anti-Iraq war voices in this country right now, Cindy Sheehan.

Ms. Sheehan told MSNBC's Chris Matthews that she is opposed to the war against the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan as well, because she believes, "that Afghanistan is almost the same thing," as Iraq.

The World Socialist Web Site explained in October 9, 2001, that their reasons for opposing the war in Afghanistan as follows:

"We reject the dishonest claims of the Bush administration that this is a war for justice and the security of the American people against terrorism."

These are now the same phony excuses used by the likes of Jane Fonda, Michael Moore and other leading anti-war critics when they speak out about the fight against terrorism in Iraq.

One of the most common refrains from those opposed to military action in Afghanistan was that we should instead "bomb them with bread" - as if bread and butter were what Osama bin Laden and his compatriots were interested in. They ignore the fact that the agenda of the radical Islamic extremists is to crush the Judeo-Christian world. Their number one targets are Israel and the United States because of who we are, what our values our, and the freedoms we grant to individuals.

But the "bomb them with bread" crowd refuses to accept this reality. And thus, their storyline hasn't changed from Afghanistan to Iraq... they continue on with their "Blame America First" mentality.

• They see America at fault in Iraq - and want to bring home U.S. Troops NOW!

• They saw America at fault in Afghanistan - and felt the U.S. should not take military action against Osama bin Laden.

• And these same misguided voices didn't advocate a U.S. response to any of the dozens of terrorist attacks against the United States in the two decades before 9/11/2001.

So why on earth should we listen to these people now when it comes to how best deal with the terrorist forces in Iraq?

The director of MoveOn.org, Eli Pariser, was one of those in the 'Blame America First' crowd that felt that the blame for the 9/11 attacks rested with the United States, and not the actual terrorists who attacked us.

In fact, Pariser started a 9/11 Peace petition that urged the White House not to take military action against the terrorists.

The petition was housed at the website http://www.911peace.org - but Pariser has had the petition removed to provide cover for MoveOn.org - as it is not a particularly popular position to advocate surrender to the forces of Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan following 9/11.

Here are the links to where the petition used to be found - before Pariser had it taken down:

http://www.911peace.org/petition.php3

http://www.9-11peace.org.cijavahosting.com/action.php3

Eli Pariser, MoveOn, and others are peddling the same 'surrender to terrorism' approach that they advocated after 9/11 in Afghanistan. They were wrong then and they are wrong again today about Iraq.

We Can't Cut & Run Now...

We Can't Allow the Anti-Military Crowd to Undermine the Mission Our Troops Are Serving in Iraq & Afghanistan

I encourage you to accept Move America's invitation you to join them as I have, as we rally together Americans to show our support for our troops and their brave fight against terrorism in Iraq & Afghanistan.

The men and women of the U.S. Armed Forces risk not only life and limb each day, but they must contend with seeing news reports of radical, anti-military extremists taking to the streets denouncing the work our troops do each day. This is demoralizing!

The anti-military crowd is mobilizing for one of the largest anti-war rallies to date - including a cross-country bus caravan and rally.

They're organizing under the "Bring Them Home Now Tour" as you can see here:

http://www.bringthemhomenowtour.org/

But we at Move America Forward believe in giving voice to those Americans who are sick of seeing news media coverage dedicated largely to the dark voices who work to undermine our troops and their mission.

And every time one of these anti-military groups takes to the streets to rally for surrender, we believe patriotic Americans must stand up and prevent another "Vietnamization" from taking place in this nation.

Our country cannot lose the resolve and the will to prevail in the struggle with the terrorists about what kind of world our children inherit.

Please go to the website to find out how you can join in the "We Support The Troops And Their Mission" national bus tour and rally.

http://www.MoveAmericaForward.org

You can also provide financial support for the tour and the rallies here:

http://www.MoveAmericaForward.org/Contribution

If you're reading this before the end of the day on Sunday, September 11, 2005 I hope you made the effort to fly the American Flag in front of your house or on display somewhere else prominently.

The flying of Old Glory on this day of infamy is the symbolism of our nation united in the face of a terrorist threat.

Our troops stand in harm's way in Afghanistan and Iraq, and some voices in this country are sounding a cry for retreat and seemingly attempting to play revisionist games with recent events.

It would be great if people all around this nation were reminded of some of the key points below. And perhaps they will be with your help - by sending a link to this post to friends, family members, co-workers and colleagues. And finally, I hope when you read this, you'll realize why we need your participation in the rallies we will hold across the nation the week after next, culminating in the giant "Support The Troops And Their Mission" Weekend in Washington, D.C. Keep watching the Move America Forward Website for more information.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

President Bush Thanks Our Troops Serving in Iraq

The War in Iraq is Central

to the War on Terrorism

Some people in this nation have come to the incorrect conclusion that Operation Iraqi Freedom has nothing to do with the attacks against the United States on 9/11.

These people either are ill informed, or they deliberately are trying to mislead the American people in the hopes of turning them against our military, our commander in chief and the mission our men and women of the U.S. Armed Forces are serving in Iraq. In many cases they represent a radical, far-left agenda that most Americans would promptly denounce. One of the strongest advocates for the anti-war effort is the Socialist Worker which is now promoting the anti-war tours of Cindy Sheehan and British socialist politico, George Galloway.

This anti-military constituency ignores the fact that what made Afghanistan such a threat to this nation was that it served as a state-sponsored breeding ground and training ground for terrorism. Al Qaeda operatives were free to gain access to weapons, bomb-making materials and train terrorists in Afghanistan because the government of that nation was sympathetic to the extremist Islamic agenda that was very much anti-American and anti-Israel.

The same situation has existed in Iraq. Saddam Hussein provided a safe-harbor for terrorists to base their operations, gain access to forged papers to travel around the world, and to acquire the materials and weapons to slaughter Americans and other innocents of the West.

As Andrew McCarthy explains in National Review:

"Saddam Hussein's regime was a crucial part of that response because it was a safety net for al Qaeda. A place where terror attacks against the United States and the West were planned. A place where Saddam's intelligence service aided and abetted al Qaeda terrorists planning operations. A place where terrorists could hide safely between attacks. A place where terrorists could lick their wounds. A place where committed terrorists could receive vital training in weapons construction and paramilitary tactics. In short, a platform of precisely the type without which an international terror network cannot succeed."

If you don't want to believe us, maybe you'll believe the Iraqi General who served under Saddam Hussein and witnessed the training of more than 4,000 terrorists at Saddam's orders.

If you're still confused that the terrorist elements under Saddam Hussein's regime were part of the Islamic terrorist coalition (that includes Al Qaeda) maybe we can make it even more straightforward for you.

The individual who leads the terrorists in Iraq right now (who have injured or killed U.S. Troops, Coalition Forces, and Iraqi civilians) is a man named Abu Musab al Zarqawi. He is the head of Al Qaeda in Iraq.

Abu Musab al Zarqawi - Al Qaeda in Iraq

You would think given the fact that the organization shooting at the men and women of our Armed Forces in Iraq was named Al Qaeda in Iraq that it would occur to the anti-war/anti-military/anti-troop crowd that perhaps these were Osama Bin Laden's allies in Iraq.

But, again, they turn a deaf ear towards these facts because the facts undermine their anti-war/anti-military and anti-Bush jihad.

When you read in the newspapers or see on TV someone who says 'maybe we should pull out of Iraq' realize this very important fact: These individuals are saying we should surrender to Al Qaeda... that we should cut and run and admit defeat to the people who have savagely attacked our nation for more than the past decade (including the horrific attacks of 9/11, the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole, the bombings of U.S. Embassies around the world, the original bombing of the World Trade Centers in 1993, etc...).

Lest you think that the idea that the terrorists in Iraq are led by Al Qaeda is a right-wing falsehood, then perhaps you'll accept it when CNN (the most pro-Saddam television network during the two Gulf Wars) says it.

And if you or someone you know still doesn't get the role Iraq plays in the fight against terrorism and the ties to Al Qaeda, maybe hearing from one of the journalists who has been on the scene - in the thick of the battle with these terrorists - will provide a clearer understanding.

Michael Yon recently lamented about the fact that the mainstream news media had failed to realize that they were sitting on one of the most important stories from the fight in Iraq: that the Al Qaeda backed terrorist network in the Mosul area had been badly beaten back by Coalition Forces led by the United States. This would serve as a major victory for the war effort in Iraq, yet most journalists are so out-of-touch with the events in Iraq (and so biased against the military's mission there) that they didn't even realize the scoop beneath their noses:

"...the top Al-Qaeda leader in Mosul writes to the second most wanted man in the world, and describes in amazing detail the weaknesses and impending collapse of the terrorist network in Mosul and surrounds."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Secretary of State Condi Rice Greets U.S. Troops in Afghanistan

The "Bring Them Home Now" Crowd

Want to Surrender in Afghanistan Too

Those who have been taking to the streets (and to the ditches of Crawford, Texas) to argue for U.S. Troops to withdraw from Iraq, have insisted that they support the broader fight against terrorism.

However, these are false words made in a defensive posture, said out of necessity. Many of the same voices who advocate surrendering to the terrorists in Iraq were vocal opponents to a military response against Al Qaeda following the 9/11 attacks on the United States.

Let's take the example of one of the better known anti-Iraq war voices in this country right now, Cindy Sheehan.

Ms. Sheehan told MSNBC's Chris Matthews that she is opposed to the war against the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan as well, because she believes, "that Afghanistan is almost the same thing," as Iraq.

The World Socialist Web Site explained in October 9, 2001, that their reasons for opposing the war in Afghanistan as follows:

"We reject the dishonest claims of the Bush administration that this is a war for justice and the security of the American people against terrorism."

These are now the same phony excuses used by the likes of Jane Fonda, Michael Moore and other leading anti-war critics when they speak out about the fight against terrorism in Iraq.

One of the most common refrains from those opposed to military action in Afghanistan was that we should instead "bomb them with bread" - as if bread and butter were what Osama bin Laden and his compatriots were interested in. They ignore the fact that the agenda of the radical Islamic extremists is to crush the Judeo-Christian world. Their number one targets are Israel and the United States because of who we are, what our values our, and the freedoms we grant to individuals.

But the "bomb them with bread" crowd refuses to accept this reality. And thus, their storyline hasn't changed from Afghanistan to Iraq... they continue on with their "Blame America First" mentality.

• They see America at fault in Iraq - and want to bring home U.S. Troops NOW!

• They saw America at fault in Afghanistan - and felt the U.S. should not take military action against Osama bin Laden.

• And these same misguided voices didn't advocate a U.S. response to any of the dozens of terrorist attacks against the United States in the two decades before 9/11/2001.

So why on earth should we listen to these people now when it comes to how best deal with the terrorist forces in Iraq?

The director of MoveOn.org, Eli Pariser, was one of those in the 'Blame America First' crowd that felt that the blame for the 9/11 attacks rested with the United States, and not the actual terrorists who attacked us.

In fact, Pariser started a 9/11 Peace petition that urged the White House not to take military action against the terrorists.

The petition was housed at the website http://www.911peace.org - but Pariser has had the petition removed to provide cover for MoveOn.org - as it is not a particularly popular position to advocate surrender to the forces of Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan following 9/11.

Here are the links to where the petition used to be found - before Pariser had it taken down:

http://www.911peace.org/petition.php3

http://www.9-11peace.org.cijavahosting.com/action.php3

Eli Pariser, MoveOn, and others are peddling the same 'surrender to terrorism' approach that they advocated after 9/11 in Afghanistan. They were wrong then and they are wrong again today about Iraq.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We Can't Cut & Run Now...

We Can't Allow the Anti-Military Crowd to Undermine the Mission Our Troops Are Serving in Iraq & Afghanistan

I encourage you to accept Move America's invitation you to join them as I have, as we rally together Americans to show our support for our troops and their brave fight against terrorism in Iraq & Afghanistan.

The men and women of the U.S. Armed Forces risk not only life and limb each day, but they must contend with seeing news reports of radical, anti-military extremists taking to the streets denouncing the work our troops do each day. This is demoralizing!

The anti-military crowd is mobilizing for one of the largest anti-war rallies to date - including a cross-country bus caravan and rally.

They're organizing under the "Bring Them Home Now Tour" as you can see here:

http://www.bringthemhomenowtour.org/

But we at Move America Forward believe in giving voice to those Americans who are sick of seeing news media coverage dedicated largely to the dark voices who work to undermine our troops and their mission.

And every time one of these anti-military groups takes to the streets to rally for surrender, we believe patriotic Americans must stand up and prevent another "Vietnamization" from taking place in this nation.

Our country cannot lose the resolve and the will to prevail in the struggle with the terrorists about what kind of world our children inherit.

Please go to the website to find out how you can join in the "We Support The Troops And Their Mission" national bus tour and rally.

http://www.MoveAmericaForward.org

You can also provide financial support for the tour and the rallies here:

http://www.MoveAmericaForward.org/Contribution

I wish I could say it was a joke. They make it sound like something it's not; but that should be no surprise.

I think it's far more serious than that, this ideology isn't going away, they're trying to make sure it takes root. They're all about getting through to our young people--that's why there are so many of them TEACHING. Take a look at Evan Coyne Maloney's site--Academic Bias. Watch the movie. It's absolutely chilling.

They may be aging, but as David Horowitz is completely aware, they're grooming University students to be extreme in their politics, and to shut down conservative voices. That's why Horowitz has the Individual Rights Foundation and Students for Academic Freedom. It's also why he's trying to introduce legislation into each of the states--the Academic Bill of Rights in order to provide some coverage for both sides of the issues rather than the commie American-hating side they tell right now.

If the likes of Ward Churchill, old members of SDS and Weathermen are any indication--our kids are being influenced by the people who call conservatives racist--and our society immoral--and Christianity foolish.

Example: Ward Churchill promotes terrorists, calls them "freedom fighters" and suggests that our boys in uniform "frag their officers". That means KILL THEM.