Free Republic

Did you take a look at MSNBC and watch their election coverage team melt down into puddles of grease with the fact Newt won tonight! Chris 'Tingle' Matthews is losing his mind, the thought his beloved Socialist is going to face Newt 'William Wallace' Gingrich on the battlefield of debate is making Matthews become more irrational than he normally is.

SenateReports.com calculates how conservative or progressive a Senator’s ideology is based on their roll call votes with their party’s majority votes greater than one while the other party’s majority of votes is less than one. In other words the roll call vote had no majority support from the other Party. For example if 21 Republican Senators voted ‘YEA’ and 15 voted ‘NAY’ on a roll call vote the party majority would be 6, if all 40 Republican Senators voted ‘YEA’ then the party majority would be 40. On the same roll call vote if 40 Democratic Senators voted ‘NAY’ and 15 voted ‘YEA’ then the party majority would -25 or 25. The Democratic majority did not support that roll call vote. The number of Republican Majority roll call votes greater than 1 ‘AND’ the number of Democratic Majority roll call vote less than 1 was ‘EQUAL’ to 84 of 299 roll call votes in 2010.
The number of Democratic Majority roll call votes greater than 1 ‘AND’ the number of Republican Majority roll call votes less than 1 was ‘EQUAL’ to 150 of 299 roll call votes in 2010. The number of votes a Senator voted with their party’s majority based on how their own party majority voted against the other party’s majority determined how progressive or conservative that Senator may be.

Unlike the National Journal there is nothing subjective about the SenateReports.com ranking process, the Senators by their votes with or against their Party Majority determine how ‘partisan’ they really are.
The results of the Senators voting with or against their Party’s Majority on key votes determined by the Party Majorities themselves have determined that Al Franken from Minnesota is the most Progressive Senator and John Thune from South Dakota is the most Conservative Senator during the 2010 Congressional year. Senators John Thune and Al Franken voted alike 57 times or 19.1%, they voted not alike 242 or 80.9% out of 299 votes during the 111 2nd Session (2010) of Congress.

Most Conservative

Rank LastName FirstName State Party Percent
1 Thune John South Dakota Republican 100%
2 Cornyn John Texas Republican 99%
2 Hatch Orrin Utah Republican 99%
2 McCain John Arizona Republican 99%
2 Burr Richard North Carolina Republican 99%
3 McConnell Mitch Kentucky Republican 98%
3 Risch Jim Idaho Republican 98%
3 Crapo Mike Idaho Republican 98%
3 Graham Lindsey South Carolina Republican 98%
3 Enzi Micheal Wyoming Republican 98%

Most Progressive

Rank LastName FirstName State Party Percent
1 Franken Al Minnesota Democratic 100%
2 Cardin Benjamin Maryland Democratic 99%
2 Levin Carl Michigan Democratic 99%
2 Stabenow Debbie Michigan Democratic 99%
2 Schumer Charles New York Democratic 99%
2 Brown Sherrod Ohio Democratic 99%
2 Feinstein Dianne California Democratic 99%
2 Durbin Richard Illinois Democratic 99%
2 Casey Robert Pennsylvania Democratic 99%
2 Whitehouse Sheldon Rhode Island Democratic 99%

The GOP must support candidates that will fight for the basic principles I have already stated and reject Globalist principles such as Free Trade, Free Markets because they do not exist my friends.

Globalist Republicans do not believe in the US Consitution because if they did we would not be in this mess.

The longer the GOP Globalist control the Republican Party the swifter the loss of our beloved Republic.

Conservatism 101

1. Is IT a conservative principle to put moratoriums on immigration and foreign worker levels during a recession or depression?

a. What is wrong with a “Hire a US Citizen First” policy? Taking care of your own people first should be a conservative principle don’t you think?

b. How can we justify as a NATION any legal immigration or foreign workers when Black unemployment is nearly double the white rate and Hispanic unemployment levels are 8.9% to 5.4% for whites:

i. http://blackpoliticsontheweb.com/2008/11/08/black-unemployment-nearly-double-white-rate/
ii. http://www.bepress.com/jbvela/vol3/iss1/art11/

c. Shouldn’t Black and Hispanic unemployment levels be less than or equal to white unemployment levels before the United States of America allows any new immigrant OR foreign worker IN?

2. United States Citizenship is Nonpartisan!

3. Is IT a conservative principle to demand that States within our Republic perform their US Constitutional duty and validate US Citizenship when people register to vote and vote?

a. Article IV – The States:
Section 4 - Republican government. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

b. Republic:

i. A government having a chief of state who is not a monarch and is usually a president; also: a nation or other political unit having such a government.
ii. A government in which supreme power is held by the citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives governing according to law.

How can we as Conservatives come together and stop the advancement of Liberalism and Socialism if we can not agree on these three BASIC points before we CAN move on to the other issues that befalls our beloved Republic.

I got my Senate voting data at http://www.SenateReports.com.

We have a Republic with democratic principals; democracies have elected Adolf Hitler, Hugo Chavez, Saddam Hussein, Hamas and now the greatest democracy the world has ever known where 43 - 45% of it’s people do not make enough money to pay taxes has elected the Democratic-Socialist Barrack Obama.

The Electoral College system we have to elect our President should have thrown out the popular vote because voter/election fraud.

Do not be shocked when Obama takes the OATH of OFFICE with his fingers crossed behind his back.

In my opinion Barrack Obama is an Enemy of the US Constitution.

We have a Republic with democratic principals; democracies have elected Adolf Hitler, Hugo Chavez, Saddam Hussein, Hamas and now the greatest democracy the world has ever known where 43 - 45% of it’s people do not make enough money to pay taxes has elected the Democratic-Socialist Barrack Obama.

The Electoral College system we have to elect our President should have thrown out the popular vote because voter/election fraud.

Do not be shocked when Obama takes the OATH of OFFICE with his fingers crossed behind his back.

In my opinion Barrack Obama is an Enemy of the US Constitution.

Senator Barrack Obama Socialist?

How do we know if Barrack Obama is a Socialist? One way to determine this and if he has Socialist tendencies is to review his voting record in the United States Senate with Bernard “Bernie” Sanders the so-called Independent Senator from Vermont but self-described “democrat-socialist”.

Please go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders or http://sanders.senate.gov/ and review Senator Sanders’s bio.

Let’s review the 110th Congress Session 1 of 2007 Senate Voting Records.
• Party Percent is defined as the percentage voting with one’s Party Majority either Yea or Nay.

Senator Party Percent Vote with Sanders Percent
John McCain 88% 34%
Jeff Sessions 89% 36%
Jon Kyl 86% 30%
Mitch McConnell (Party Leader) 92% 35%

Bernard Sanders (Independent) 95% 100%

Barrack Obama 96% 92%
Barbara Boxer 96% 89%
Dianne Feinstein 94% 85%
Harry Reid (Party Leader) 96% 92%

If Barrack Obama votes 92% of the time with a “Socialist” does that fact make him and his Democratic Party lending towards “Socialism”, just a question?

Remember the immortal words of John Adams “Facts are stubborn things”.

I got my United States Senate voting data at http://SenateReports.com you can too!