Free Republic

“Where’s Rush and O’Reilly and Hannity et al?”

Drudge only broke the story tonight. They’ll be on it tomorrow on their shows. This is going to be great!

Talk to anyone in law enforcement. Lesbians have some of the most violent domestic disputes you can imagine. I don’t know why, but uncontrollable rage is frequently a part of their lifestyle. Again, I get this straight from cop friends and also firefighters who have done arson investigation. Some of the stuff would raise the hair on your back.

LOL, I wonder if she’s already pegged Rosie Odonnell as her chief of staff. Not a pretty picture.

Kudos to Drudge. The guy has no fear when attacking the Dims and their nutty base of alternative lifestylers. The Left Coast wackos are going to freak on this one, LOL!

Here’s a key statement from the Log Cabin site itself which perfectly reveals why I don’t trust them ( http://online.logcabin.org/about/ ):

“Over the last three decades, many gay and lesbian activists worked hard to make the Democratic Party more inclusive on gay and lesbian issues. Log Cabin Republicans are doing the same important work to transform the GOP.”

What specifically could they possibly be alluding to other than special rights legislation and other key elements of the homosexual agenda? Wherever a homosexual activist operates, they seem to be trying to achieve the same agenda of social engineering.

What about a person who embraces evil as a lifestyle and calls it normal (e.g. a homosexual)?

If a Republican office holder was secretly a Satanist, yet was otherwise a good conservative - anti-abortion, fiscal conservative, small government supporter, pro-military, etc. - but who did support civil unions and opposed discrimination based on sexual orientation would you be willing to support him?

“What about habitual adulterers like Giuliani and Gingrich?”

I’m not sure your point. These men have openly admitted making mistakes in their lives. They still strongly believe in the family and children needing a mother and a father and embrace Christian values. That is worlds away from a man who penetrates another man through a body canal for waste excretion and then claims that as a lifestyle. These are not people who had some momentary lapse, they actually claim that the bizarre and disgusting stuff they do is normal. Sorry, but a person like that is just plain nuts (IMHO).

When I was a kid my parents warned me about homosexuals at the movie theater. Nothing ever happened to me, but I guess it was common for homosexuals to try and molest kids in dark movie theaters. There is a certain amount of predatory behavior in that lifestyle community. Dr. Laura spoke about it several years ago when she pointed out that the homosexuals are obsessed with young boys. After she pointed that out, the homosexual militants went nuts.

“If you ban all sinners from the GOP you’ll depopulate the party.”

Isn’t there a difference? The homosexuals don’t see it as sin, but claim they are normal. That is different than a person who makes a mistake and regrets it. It would be comparable to a group of hard core alcoholics who claim that being drunk gives them nutritional advantage and want to marry another alcoholic and teach their kids that it’s normal. Most people recognize that as psychopathic logic.

Someone who gets angry and accidentally swears or something like that is totally different. They are not claiming that sin itself is a gift from God as the homosexuals claim.

“I would not support bringing alcohol to school dances, or books that say being an alcoholic is natural and normal.”

That’s exactly my point. How can you trust someone who blatantly portrays evil as good? The homosexual who isn’t trying to get out of that lifestyle is claiming that they are normal. That is insane. Someone like that is in so much denial that it affects everything they do.

“We’re not associating with him and he’s certainly not a role model. He’s a politician (ick!).”

I strongly disagree. Ronald Reagan was a great role model and I wouldn’t be afraid to have my kids around him.

“I’d have to lend some support to an effective politician who looked after the country’s welfare, even if he was queer.”

An important part of looking after the country’s welfare is securing its culture and values. Where exactly does two men sodomizing each other in a toilet or some other homosexual haunt fit into that picture? I vote for the whole person, not just some fake facade. If Barney Frank suddenly started voted the right way on Republican issues, do you think I would embrace him into the Party? - no way in Hell! Values are more than just a simple voting record.

“If he’s good on guns, taxes, and property rights, the War on Terror, and Illegal Immigration, I’ll definitely forgive him for being queer... even of he DOES get involved in homosexual issues.”

My question then would be: do you really want a person like this influencing our kids? If a someone realizes that lifestyle choice is unhealthy and gets out of it - that’s one thing. But if they actually embrace the behavior, what kind of message does that send to our kids? In order for a person like that to justify their behavior, they would have to be willing to completely lie to our kids about their lifestyle. That to me is such a major character flaw that I can’t support them.

Even smokers know their choice in unhealthy. But homosexuals go much farther in actually embracing their behavior and claiming it is normal and healthy. That is an indication of how delusional they are (not to mention all the toilet stuff in the news). I don’t want my kids associating with someone who lacks values like that and I certainly wouldn’t consider them as holding Republican values (since family is the core). Sorry, just my opinion.

It boggles the mind how homosexuals literally link human poop as some kind of erotic stimulant. These people are whacked.

“It wasn’t that long ago that almost all American held this to be truth”

They still do. Whenever reporting poll results, the MSM spin the wording and only give partial results. If you go to the actual numbers and the precise wording of the questions, in every case Americans always overwhelmingly respond that they disagree with the homosexual lifestyle and find it unhealthy (especially for their own kids).

“isn’t the point of any specialized group to support candidates in line with the group’s pet view?”

You consider the support of sodomy to be a substantial enough and legitimate enough issue to form a whole group around? It would be like forming a group that celebrates cross-dressing or S&M. To me that is just too fringe. To focus on such a tiny niche lifestyle issue seems very strange. Gun ownership rights on the other hand are a foundational issue of great importance since the day our country was founded (and involves millions of people not just a few hundred).

“That is, 99% of what he does has nothing to do with homosexuality. If he were to recuse himself from voting on issues surrounding homosexuality, would Republicans, even those very steadfastly opposed to the homosexual agenda, be willing to support him?”

That is precisely the dilemma I see. The article just confirms like I said ... that when it comes down to crunch time, every one of these homosexual groups votes on protecting their bedroom shenanigans. Yes, that is only 0.0001% of all issues, but when it eventually comes up, these gays seem to suddenly vote in lockstep. It controls their life to an extreme degree. Just look at all the scandals they become involved in. They don’t appear to be completely stable mentally and that characteristic eventually undermines them in everything else.

“Those ‘hit ads’ were Romney is his own words. Informed Republican voters need to know about his unshrinking supporting for abortion and other liberal causes in the past.”

We’re not talking about the same ad then. The one I’m talking about was discussed extensively on FoxNews. The Log Cabin guest even said it was to highlight Romney’s past support of their lifestyle. They weren’t saying it was a bad thing. They were angry because he no longer supports the homosexual lifestyle.

I just feel if they are truly a Republican group, they should be using all that money (over $60,000!) to highlight the socialized medicine debacle of Hitlery or the cut-and-run plan of Obama. To attack a Republican, just because he doesn’t embrace sodomy is rediculous.

“the only reason the ‘Religious Right’ is even doing anything is because of the way the liberals/liberaltarians have FORCED bedroom issues into everyone’s faces and made an issue out of them”

No doubt. As Christians, we have always valued the religous freedom of America as one of its key founding elements. Every Christian I know has practiced their faith quietly and respectfully. It was the homosexual activists and liberal militants who stormed our cathedrals and churches with their protests and threats. That is the only reason we now have to protect what few religous freedoms are left. It seems the ultimate liberal goal is to literally outlaw our values and make Christianity a crime.

Great story. Proves once again that personal responsibility and embracing Christian values can overcome any kind of problem no matter how insurmountable it seems.