Same. During the summers, I was outside all day and came home as the sun was setting. Magical times with all the freedoms we had. Not a care in the world. Kids should be allowed to be kids.
Exactly. Whether she puts down a dangerous dog is one thing (sometimes it has to be done), but being VP or Potus is quite another thing. That said, this article was written primarily to distort people’s thinking and just air dirt. Folks end up arguing in circles. It’s a custom that goes far back. Take a look at some of the articles in the papers dating back to the 1800s. LMAO.
My father shot and killed a dog after it killed several of his chickens. It was also the neighbor’s dog and it wasn’t thought of as anything but a logical necessity, because, I mean what else was it? People these days don’t make any sense and I say that as a Gen-Xer.
I glanced at other papers this author wrote and yikes! He’s not exactly a brainiac. Lots of nonsensical jargon, trendy “woke” words, delusional thinking... and apparently he is at Deakin U in Australia which describes itself as a “progressive, innovative and open-minded university.”
Why is “tolerance” and “inclusivity” always assumed to equal “good”? This is not accurate. There are plenty of things to be intolerant of and plenty of reasons to exclude things. Things like pedophlilia and perversions. Things like people preying on kids. Jeezus.
A 50+ y.o. guy bothers a bunch of teens, they ask him to leave them alone, but he refuses. One girl in particular again tells him to leave and then he punches her in the face. As a response, everyone piles on him. He falls into the water, comes back up with a knife hidden in his fist, and stabs 5 teens using prison-style shanking (disemboweling one and injuring 4 others). One teen dies. So, the conclusion is “eff the jury” for convicting him of reckless homicide and it was the fault of the teens for getting stabbed/killed? I don’t see the logic here.