“I wouldn’t either if she were an American and represented that same level of Statecraft that Margaret Thatcher accomplished in England.”
I was just teasing. :/
Besides, what makes someone “good enough” to be on money anyways? It’s purely objective. Many countries put people on their money simply because of their bloodlines. It really means nothing anyways. I care more about what the money’s worth than who’s on it. As a woman, having men on my money has never negatively impacted my life anymore than having a woman on my money will positively impact my life. It just ends up being thrown at strippers or else rolled up and used to do lines.
“...that honor should rightly belong to Harriet Beecher Stowe, author of Uncle Toms Cabin, the most important of all American novels.”
Seriously? I have nothing against Stowe, but writing a book is nothing like risking your life to save others. Also, I can think of many other American women who are, arguably, more influential than Stowe. Besides, Tubman was a “gun-touting Republican” as I saw someone say. It works for me. At least it’s not Eleanor Roosevelt, Margret Sanger, or, heaven forfend, Hillary Clinton.
I dunno why. They should’ve been joyful that she supported a “woman’s right to choose” and embryonic stem cell research. She was far more progressive than her husband was.
May she RIP. She wasn’t very Conservative, from what I’ve heard, but she brought dignity to the position of FLOTUS. And if she was good enough for Reagan to love, she must have been a very special person.
The reason I can’t is because A) I’m not bold when it comes to relationships B) I’ve never been in one. I’ve never even been asked out. I wouldn’t know what to do. I’m still pretty young though, so who knows.
I actually heard about the Klan when I was living in CA. Democrats like nice weather too. That’s why the state is fraught with degenerates, serial killers, corrupt politicians, etc.